Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Bryan (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Oxford University Cricket Club players. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tom Bryan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page is sourced entirely from a hobby cricket website. Subject is not notable and has not been covered in reliable sources. No new reliable sources have been added Muchasz (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 February 7. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Noting for the record that this Tom Bryan appears to be an entirely different person from the Tom Bryan whose article was deleted in 2006 per the earlier AfD. --Finngall talk 00:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and England. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Oxford University Cricket Club players as a valid WP:ATD. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect per Joseph2302. OliveYouBean (talk) 09:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Oxford University Cricket Club players A suitable WP:ATD, which I originally redirected to when the page was PRODed, but was removed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Clearly a redirect - a shame that the mess of reverts threw RF's redirect out with the bath water Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Can we use common sense and redirect where a list exists? Saves everyone time all-round. StickyWicket (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.