Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TopSpeed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- TopSpeed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This game has not been released yet. Since when do we have articles on a game in beta that doesn't even have that many Ghits outside of its company's advertising? Also seems pretty spamalicious to me. NellieBly (talk) 02:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question You say it hasn't been released, but the page says July 5, and the download link works. So what's up? Ctjf83Talk 02:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer That's the beta release. I suspect they're using the article deliberately to attract free beta testers. --NellieBly (talk) 03:38, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm still slightly confused, the article is for the first version, and the download link is for the second? Actually, I'm just gonna go with delete anyway Ctjf83Talk 03:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer That's the beta release. I suspect they're using the article deliberately to attract free beta testers. --NellieBly (talk) 03:38, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spam page, used to promote the game. Ctjf83Talk 03:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Clearly advertising for the beta test MattieTK 12:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- G11 — yet another MMORPG engaging in blatant advertising MuZemike (talk) 15:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:SPAM. No sources for this game that aren't just press releases or unreliable fan pages. Randomran (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete spam, and not even remotely good spam. (I removed some of the more heinous infractions) -Verdatum (talk) 16:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Spam. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.