Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish Airlines Flight 1754

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Airlines Flight 1754

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hijacking attempt. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. No evidence that this event will have any lasting effects. Since the hijacker's claim of having a bomb proved false, it is not likely that any long term changes in security policy will derive from this event. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Divert this one to Turkish Airlines#Incidents and accidents, where it can be mentioned. No redirect, since its unlikely that anyone would ever look for this by flight number anyway, and articles with the airline and flight number in the title-- such as Turkish Airlines Flight 981-- shouldn't be hidden in a plethora of other THY Flight # articles. Mandsford 22:07, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Also a redirect is not necessary. The incident is already listed on the Turkish Airlines page.William 23:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and don't redirect per nominator and Mandsford. No evidence that there is enough information to sustain a standalone article. Thryduulf (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of aircraft hijackings. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 15:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it should be redirected, but I'm glad you pointed out that list-- I've gone ahead an added this one to it, yay, I got to create a new section for the 2010s. [1]. Mandsford 16:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Admrboltz (talk) 18:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.