Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unlimited Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlimited Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability . It is on the LSE, but not the main section: being on its "Fledgling Index" corresponds to what we call not yet notable DGG ( talk ) 21:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being listed is no measure of notability. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 02:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Sparse content, sparse references. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.