Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktoriya Sasonkina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. RebeccaGreen's additional sources were not challenged by anyone once presented. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viktoriya Sasonkina

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Really dreadfully written article. No substantiation that this person is notable. Mccapra (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find articles about her in Vogue Ukraine [1], Cosmopolitan Ukraine [2], a Polish website [3], a Vogue Italia gallery that confirms cover photos, designers, etc [4]. I believe that she meets WP:NMODEL, and AfD is not about the quality of the article, which can easily be edited. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per RebeccaGreen. Britishfinance (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.