Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wailing Wall (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no other deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 23:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wailing Wall (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage except for the Allmusic album review that is in the article already. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 02:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 03:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 03:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have added some further material referenced to Patrick Lundborg's encyclopedia of underground music, The Acid Archives: A Guide to Underground Sounds 1965–1982, which dedicates an article to the band and its album. Together with the AllMusic source, this should satisfy the notability requirement. (Even if not, there are very likely to be further sources. In the preface of the meticulously researched A Gathering of Promises: The Battle for Texas's Psychedelic Music from the 13th Floor Elevators to the Black Angels and Beyond, author Ben Graham refers to them as "an important group" and laments that there was no room in the book to cover them. This points to the existence of further published background material, probably offline.) —Psychonaut (talk) 07:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw: I'm going to AGF that the print source provided by Psychonaut has significant coverage and withdraw this. SL93 (talk) 22:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.