Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William H. Nelson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

William H. Nelson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced BLP. Subject does not appear to be notable enough for a standalone article. Fails WP:GNG. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Medicine. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California, New York, and Utah. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is most likely a promotional resume (ex: "Were he keeping score, he says, his career has had more high points than lows. He's received prestigious awards and Intermountain has been honored a number of times as an example of a well-run health-care system"). None of the 3 refs are notability-lending and even if they were the tone merits a WP:TNT-delete anyway. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.