Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yan Hai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yan Hai

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With only 3 appearances and no activity since 2010, this BLP may not pass WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTY. – robertsky (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. – robertsky (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. – robertsky (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does pass NFOOTBALL, but barely, and there is longstanding consensus that players who scrape by on NFOOTBALL but fail comprehensively on GNG (like here) are not notable. Giant Snowman 11:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails GNG. NFOOTBALL presumes significant coverage as a result of its criteria, but there are barely any sources about the subject. Only sources I could find other than the one in the article are not significant coverage. [1] [2] — Eliyr [ talk ] 01:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet the criteria set out by NFOOTBALL Devoke water 18:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.