Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yewande Sadiku

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yewande Sadiku

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I consider this an unmistakable copyvio of the first paragraphs of the subjectsprofile on their prootional website https://kibusinessforum.com/portfolio/hon-yewande-sadiku/

Another admin, whom I have notified, does not agree. Comparing the article the arrangement and wording is followed exactly, except of the omission of a few words or phrases. It's much more similar than what I would normally consider an excessively close paraphrase, and we delete even those.

It also fails to show notability: the references are either mere notices, or promotional interviews where the subject says whatever they care to , and are therefor not independent.enough to show notability DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:35, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:35, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:35, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Honestly I do not believe GNG is satisfied here. Celestina007 (talk) 08:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sustained coverage in WP:RS. The beginning of the article is rearranged from the first paragraph of the promotional page the nominator linked, odd capitalization and all. She's very accomplished and has much to be proud of, but this does not make her notable, and it's faintly possible that this is a vanity page. FalconK (talk) 06:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Alas, I tried to find significant coverage but most of it consists passing mentions or press release-y reading information about meetings she held. Missvain (talk) 23:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.