Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuridia Durán

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Based on sources, keep. If notability of the competition is not enough, a topic review is needed. Tone 15:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yuridia Durán

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

local beauty pageant winner. Fails GNG. No other claim to notability. Article contains a lot of unrelated citations to prop it up. I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable beauty queen.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These pages have already been reviewed and no problems were detected. Besides that she is not a local but a national queen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocio445 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC) — Rocio445 (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Angelmtz22 (talk • contribs). [reply]
I do not understand the reason why you want to delete it, if you actually insert references to articles from newspaper magazines and national media in the country. In addition to the fact that she is not a local but a national queen who will represent the country at an international level. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelmtz22 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC) — Angelmtz22 (talk • contribs) is blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate. [reply]
- John Pack Lambert, (T) We should consider that this user User:I Nyoman Gede Anila is going through all the pages of the beauty queens putting the removal tag. in addition to that he was already warned by the user Praxidicae in his lave od discussion to stop this type of abuse or that he was arrested for doing this sabotage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelmtz22 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable beauty queen. This user here >>> contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Angelmtz22, using and creating multiple accounts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk • contribs) 17:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:I Nyoman Gede Anila you cannot vote on your own AFD, as you have already said delete by sending the article to AFD. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 10:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She has won a major national beauty pageant (Mexicana Universal). The razón article has minimally adequate depth, and the minor coverage on other sources is cumulatively adequate. The article is well sourced and not promotional. Daask (talk) 13:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 03:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have not found anything on wikipedia policy on pageants. My opinion is that the winner of a national pageant officially recognized by the country who have been recognized in non trivial RS articles should be included. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 10:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:GNG. Sourcing is decent. Plenty of titles and a national major title.BabbaQ (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.