Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Villere

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zack Villere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a musician, who has no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no strong reliable source coverage to carry it. The only notability claim being made here at all is his number of followers on social media, which as always is not a notability freebie that exempts a person from having to have quality references -- but the only reference present here at all is a single dead link. One reference is not enough, all by itself, to get a person over the "notable because media coverage exists" bar, but nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have more coverage than this. Bearcat (talk) 21:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I BLProded this same article, by the same editor, back in 2017 and it was removed after the 2 week period because nothing was added to source it. In the intervening 2 years there's been essentially no movement or reliable sourcing. Clearly nothing has changed to bring notability or sourcing. JamesG5 (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.