Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zafar Mahmood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. We can't redirect to a redirect. Should the status of List of... change, this redirect can be created as part of the editorial process. Star Mississippi 00:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zafar Mahmood

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zafar Mahmood

Cricketer whose only reference is a database entry (no longer permitted as the only reference) and for whom no claim is made that would satisfy general notability because nothing is said about what third parties have written. Also does not satisfy the current version of cricket notability because there is no indication that he played test cricket or otherwise played internationally. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and Pakistan. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails WP:NCRICKET. Elbatli (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A reasonable career of 16 FC matches, but in a basic internet search, I'm not seeing anything to suggest a GNG pass. There may be coverage offline or in non-English language sources though. Not seeing a suitable redirect here as there's no main team he's played for. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Khairpur cricketers - which is itself a redirect for now until someone puts the graft in to develop it. 13 of his 16 matches were for Khairpur and he played for the side over an 8 year period. That's a decent enough compromise for me to suggest that that's the best redirect target in a case such as this. Ideally we'd merge a note to that list per WP:ATD-M, but that might have to wait. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.