Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/March 2016
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was kept by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
- Notified: Jpeeling, WikiProject Cricket
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it no longer meets FL criteria. Being a 2005 nominee, it certainly fails to meet criteria needed to be a FL. Major updating and more reliable sources would be needed for this to meet FL criteria.Will211 (talk) 21:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you clarify? Apparently the World XI haven't played since 2005 so what needs updating? What more reliable sources do you need above ESPNcricinfo? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I've done some tidying on this list now; mostly making the table accessible and fixing the sorting a bit. Harrias talk 19:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - nomination is nonsense, the article is up to date and the sourcing is impeccably reliable. I see no issues with this list at all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I agree with Chris, I am struggling to understand why this list has been nominated for removal. No reason to delist. NapHit (talk) 14:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – The reasoning is very vague. I don't see why the article has to be updated. Thanks Harrias for polishing the article. —Vensatry (Talk) 12:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – there's no need of updating here. There are enough refs. Satisfies FL criteria. --Skr15081997 (talk) 11:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article isn't outdated since this team hasn't played since 2005. Passes FL criteria. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - SchroCat – ''Hapus Dydd Gŵyl Dewi'' (talk) 08:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was kept by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC) [2].[reply]
- Notified: Jpeeling, WikiProject Cricket
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it no longer meets FL criteria. Being a 2005 nominee, it certainly fails to meet criteria needed to be a FL. Major updating and more reliable sources would be needed for this to meet FL criteria.Will211 (talk) 21:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you clarify? Apparently the World XI haven't played since 2005 so what needs updating? What more reliable sources do you need above ESPNcricinfo? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I've done some tidying on this list now; mostly making the table accessible and fixing the sorting a bit. Harrias talk 19:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - nomination is nonsense, the article is up to date and the sourcing is impeccably reliable. I see no issues with this list at all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I agree with Chris, I am struggling to understand why this list has been nominated for removal. No reason to delist. NapHit (talk) 14:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – The reasoning is very vague. I don't see why the article has to be updated. Thanks Harrias for polishing the article. —Vensatry (Talk) 12:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – there's no need of updating here. There are enough refs. Satisfies FL criteria. --Skr15081997 (talk) 11:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article isn't outdated since this team hasn't played since 2005. Passes FL criteria. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - SchroCat – ''Hapus Dydd Gŵyl Dewi'' (talk) 08:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC) [3].[reply]
- Notified: Gary, Milk's Favorite Cookie and WikiProject Rock music
Promoted to FL status way back in 2008, this list doesn't meet the current standards of sourcing. Several awards sections have no sources at all. The "Billboard Decade-End" section has been unsourced since 2010. Skr15081997 (talk) 10:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist too much unreferenced content, and some of the awards are missing descriptions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Many of the awards are missing references, particularly in the latter half of the list but elsewhere as well. It has not been well-maintained, as there are several dead links. When it was originally promoted to FL many years ago, it was a much shorter list: [4] They've either been nominated for a lot more awards since its promotion or the original expanders did not include a lot of awards. Either way, this is far from being a featured list anymore. In addition, the referencing formats are incorrect. Johanna(talk to me!) 17:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - – SchroCat (talk) 08:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.