Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 June 6

< June 5	June 7 >

June 6

File:G Furd.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, unencyclopedic. • ɔ ʃ → 20:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JPN2 Furd.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, unencyclopedic. • ɔ ʃ → 20:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Test Broadcast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 07:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — File:SMPTE Color Bars.svg is a much better resolution file that does not have an unnecessary border around it. PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stamp-autumn.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus; but it seems a solution has been offrered. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Delete: Non-free 1971 postage stamp being used to illustrate the fact the images by the subject of the article illustrated stamps is used in a non postage stamp article fails WP:NFC#Images #3. It also fails WP:NFCC#8 because the stamp's existence and its purpose are perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image and the lack of a non-free image is not detrimental to the reader's understanding of the facts. ww2censor (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This postage stamp image is being used to identify (not merely 'illustrate') the particular stamp. The image's presence, in my view, whilst not necessary, significantly increases readers' understanding of the topic of the section (Alma_Duncan#Canada_Post) and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. It is the only image in that section. According to the article the stamp has been awarded a stamp of the month ("Stamp of the Month." Scott Monthly Journal 52 (19 Sept. 1971): 3.) which would seem to meet the desired critical commentary . So it seems to me it passes WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 09:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have tidied up the licencing things and the article a bit. And asked the editor (ww2censor) who proposed the deletion (several days ago (7th June) to have another look at this one and for some help but I guess he has been too busy to get back in touch. I have also refered to that user's fair use stamps helpful page which has examples of correct use and this case seems to me to be better than one of the exemplar cases good uses: the use of Eileen Mayo's Platypus. There it is just one of her stamps - whereas here it is Alma Duncan's particular stamp of the month that our image allows readers more easily to identify. Anyway best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 09:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons - Judge Me Tender - Moe and Simon Cowell.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image fails WP:NFCC. There's already a non-free image of Cowell in the article (#3.a.), and this image doesn't significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic (#8). Theleftorium ^(talk) 15:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright violation. Should not be here. RIPGC (talk) 06:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tuning-e-ren.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Porcelain design sample.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Four umbrellas sample.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Post card sample.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Porcelain Klimt design.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stationary sample.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scarf sample design.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:File Box sample.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coaster design sample.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC00185.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no description, vague title, and I don't have any idea where this would go. Serves no encyclopedic purpose. –MuZemike 21:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC00205.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no description, vague title, and I have no idea where to place this image in the encyclopedia. –MuZemike 22:21, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
MuZemike might not know but someone must know what kind of plane this is. Maybe it's a rare type? "I have no idea" is not a reason to delete. RIPGC (talk) 06:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC00188.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MuZemike (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no description, vague title, and I have no idea where to place this in the encyclopedia. –MuZemike 22:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If it helps, I found a similar image here. The building in the photo might be in Finland.--Rockfang (talk) 01:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If someone (or myself) can find what that building is, then I can move that image to Commons easily. –MuZemike 18:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Helsinki Lutheran Cathedral (kind of an oxymoron to use an overtly Catholic term for a Lutheran building IMO). I'll move this to Commons and withdraw the deletion request. –MuZemike 18:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done moved to File:Helsinki Lutheran Cathedral.jpg on Commons. –MuZemike 18:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC00274.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and serves no encyclopedic purpose. –MuZemike 22:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - While not currently used in any articles, it is used at Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs/Dog photos task force/AlbumPage2.--Rockfang (talk) 01:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.