Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 22

< August 21	August 23 >

August 22

File:Om hindu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and very low quality; better quality versions are available on Commons: e.g. File:Aum calligraphy Red.svg, File:Aum.svg and more. Codename Lisa (talk) 15:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seeing as it's still used on non-article pages
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kelly ^hi! 09:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Om .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and very low quality; better quality versions are available on Commons: e.g. File:Aum calligraphy Red.svg and File:Aum.svg Codename Lisa (talk) 15:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seeing as it's still used on non-article pages
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kelly ^hi! 09:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Khan Academy logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξ ^xplicit 06:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo might be PD-Logo, need someone else to look. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 00:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That leaf shape may be pushing it a little. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Us senate result 1986.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superior version available: File:1986 Senate election map.svg FASTILY 05:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notified uploader. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree it looks superseded. Willhsmit (talk) 01:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ed Koch Tombstone November 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free work (there is no FOP in the US) FASTILY 05:22, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASMITA MARWA.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. A professional portrait would still require WP:OTRS from the photographer. — ξ ^xplicit 06:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be professional portrait, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 08:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader's name and editing field indicate they may work in a context where they could create professional portraits. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Henry and Joan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, blurry. Clearer images available at Commons:Category:Henry the IV's tomb, Canterbury. Kelly ^hi! 09:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Astley hall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, blurry. Clearer images available at Commons:Category:Astley Hall. Kelly ^hi! 10:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aston Ingham.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 18:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low resolution. Clearer images available at Commons:Category:St John the Baptist's, Aston Ingham. Kelly ^hi! 10:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kate-bush-emi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails NFCC point 1 given that File:Kate Bush at 1986 Comic Relief (cropped).png serves equally well for identifying and illustrating Ms. Bush. The fact that some may think the promo image is more flatting is inapposite. Additionally, per WP:NFC#UUI point 1, non-free photographs of living people are usually forbidden even when a non-free alternative does not yet exist. Rebb ing 11:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Athena wiki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be professional, web resolution, no data. No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 12:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Atsme, self-portrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn - early close as unanimous Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete, unused userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 12:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Keep, deleting it would not improve the project;) and illustrates Atsme's wonderful ... um ... Brittanicas, very well -Roxy the dog™ bark 13:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^{That one gave me carpet burns.^{Atsme📞📧} 18:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)}[reply]

Snow Keep, per Wikipedia:Image_use_policy also fixed the unbracketed "keep local" code, image for user page re: historic encyclopedic reference. ^{Atsme📞📧} 14:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the image is now in use and is not otherwise problematic. There's also something very funny about a Wikipedia editor having on her user page a self-portrait taken in front of a print encyclopedia. :) Rebb ing 16:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as now in use (and quite clever!). Roxy: sit, stay. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, file now in use. Kelly ^hi! 06:46, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NURugby logo 2011.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Querying non-free status as this looks like it only has text? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NRK1 logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Querying this based on it being simple at Commons? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NSCAD Logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Querying the non-free status as this is a text-logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It'd PD in the US certainly. Probably in Canada as well seeing as they don't follow the "sweat of the brow" doctrine. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NTD Television.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Seems like the country of origin is the United States. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Querying non-free status, as this is treated as simple on Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Keiren Commission Picture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, apparent self-portrait. Originally used in Keiren Arakawa, which was CSD'ed (A7). Randykitty (talk) 14:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Israfil Mammadov.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Israfil Mammadov died in 1946, how can this be the editor's own work. A number of other uploads by this editor seem as dubious.[1] Doug Weller talk 15:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if the editor is 90 years old or more. Could be relicensed as non-free, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It looks a lot like a crop of the image at http://www.savash-az.com/hero/israfmam.htm. ★ Bigr Tex 18:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.