Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 31

< May 30	June 1 >

May 31

File:Nazi propaganda - Give me four years’ time - 1937.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear if this is free in the US. May be restored if someone is able to provide a source/citation proving the file is free -FASTILY 06:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed alien property custodian but I cannot verify that. It would need a reliable source or point to NARA or Library of Congress information indicating it was seized. b uidhe 01:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC

I think the proper license is {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} Per this 2015 discussion [1] at "War History Online," copyright expired in Germany 70 years after publication, or in 2007 for this poster. Since Germany is now in the EU, this would seem to be the proper license. --Pete Tillman (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} is an EU-only template. Note the text at the bottom: "Furthermore, as Wikipedia is hosted in the USA, this tag alone is not sufficient copyright tagging. A second tag must be supplied to indicate why the image is in the public domain in the USA as well." Wikiacc (¶) 15:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tillman: May you convert the tag into {{tl}} please? Seems that the transclusion has affected indentation of other nominations below. George Ho (talk) 20:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In Germany copyright runs at least 70 years, longer if the work is not genuinely anonymous. Therefore it was copyrighted on the URAA date and not free in US until publication + 95 years, unless alien property custodian applies. b uidhe 09:19, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arrowverse key players.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to a similar piece of non-free media in the infobox. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Antonio Scopelliti.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Italian photo, unknown date. No evidence the the photo is from before 1976, as required to be in the public domain in the US. See {{PD-Italy}}. Wikiacc (¶) 15:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arco di Augusto Rimini (2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Italian image from 1981. Since it was made after 1976, it can't be public domain in the United States. See {{PD-Italy}}. Wikiacc (¶) 15:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Askjamie are you hot?.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not too simple for copyright, because it contains a low-res profile photo. Wikiacc (¶) 15:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it is now fully orphaned Ollieinc (talk) 12:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baheer arye.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence this photo was created prior to 1946, as required to be public domain in the United States (see {{PD-Israel}}). Delete or convert to non-free with {{Non-free biog-pic}}. Wikiacc (¶) 15:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Benmeir shlomo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence this photo was created prior to 1946, as required to be public domain in the United States (see {{PD-Israel}}). Delete or convert to non-free with {{Non-free biog-pic}}. Wikiacc (¶) 15:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CandlePark.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader simultaneously states "Copyright: St. Anne Parish & Diocesan Shrine Parish Youth Committee" and {{PD-Philippines}}. Not clear what license was intended. Wikiacc (¶) 16:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carmelo Barbaro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo from the government of Italy. No evidence this work is in the public domain, as claimed. Wikiacc (¶) 16:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CutlerNasser.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australian image from 1955. According to {{PD-Australia}}, it entered the public domain in Australia after the URAA date, and so it's still copyrighted in the US. Wikiacc (¶) 16:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daniel Go (Architect).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence the uploader is truly the copyright holder, as claimed. Wikiacc (¶) 16:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Francesco Madonia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Italian photo from 1980. Not in the public domain in the United States, per {{PD-Italy}}. Wikiacc (¶) 16:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Francescomannoia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Italian photo from 1986, currently copyrighted in the United States. See File:Francescomannoia.jpg. Wikiacc (¶) 16:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hendrik Verwoerd official photo 1958.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1958 photo from South Africa, entered the public domain in South Africa in 2009 (see {{PD-South-Africa}}). Still copyrighted in the United States. Delete or convert to non-free using {{Non-free biog-pic}}. Wikiacc (¶) 17:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hitler-car.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by El C (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

German World War II image. US Holocaust Memorial Museum claims to own US copyright. Even if that's not true, I can't find evidence it's in the public domain in the United States. See Wikipedia:Public domain#German World War II images. Wikiacc (¶) 17:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you're trying to say. "Even if that's not true" — what? And what do you mean "WWII" — the image is from 1938. And anyway, who cares? The image is orphaned. Here, I deleted it. El_C 18:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KTRK-TV.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph of a TV program, claimed own work. Copyright presumably remains with the copyright holder of the TV program. File is unused. Wikiacc (¶) 17:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manchester Art Gallery - Gallery 3 Etty wall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. The nominator has withdrawn the FFD. bibliomaniac 1 5 21:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo from an art gallery, where one of the artworks is copyrighted. Wikiacc (¶) 17:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in the file description, the Banksy image is at such low resolution that it has no commercial value. I'll go a step further and say that it's reproduced at such low resolution that it's not even identifiable. You can't tell that it's a protestor unless you're already familiar with the piece; it looks like a guy wearing a suit and a beard. While enwiki isn't Commons and so c:C:de minimis isn't policy here, this image plainly meets that standard IMO and we don't have any local guidance that I'm aware of. Keep. —Cryptic 18:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cryptic. Odd nom. IRL, no-one would even know that's a Banksy if we hadn't told 'em. ——Serial^# 19:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination. As far as I can tell, Cryptic is correct and c:COM:De minimis is the relevant guideline here. Wikiacc (¶) 20:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As per the file description the Banksy is of such low resolution that nobody could make use of it even if they wanted; if it weren't for the giant signature, it wouldn't even be identifiable. Since this is obviously a photograph of the wall of Etty paintings, the 1%-ish of the photo occupied by the out-of-focus Banksy is about as textbook an example of incidental inclusion as they come. ‑ Iridescent 20:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- per the very good arguments made by the keeps above. I had no idea this was a Banksy until the nominator said it. Cassianto^Talk 20:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joe-foss-1990s-photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence this photo is a US government work. Source website is not actually a US government site. Wikiacc (¶) 19:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ProFor2015.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image from Sandia National Laboratory, which claims copyright on materials on their website. See Template talk:PD-USGov-DOE. Wikiacc (¶) 20:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Schizaea pennula.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A diagram tagged as being a US federal government work, but it is from Flora of North America, which appears to be published by a private organization. Diagram is signed "K. Smith '90" which suggests it was drawn by a private author in 1990. Wikiacc (¶) 20:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Breath of Fire - Dragon Quarter Coverart.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Closing this as not actionable. There doesn't seem to be a content dispute, and the only named party has not commented. If you're thinking about changing the infobox image, I'd say be WP:BOLD and do it. -FASTILY 06:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to upload the North American (NTSC-U/C) box art just to have both images discussed at FFD. However, turns out that it was first uploaded in 2008. Then the image was replaced with the original Japanese (NTSC-J) one by Hippo99. WP:VGBOX encourages using English-language cover arts. The Japanese cover uses the English title with the "V" but also has Japanese-language text. The North American cover is in English language but omits "V" for some reason.

I initially thought about requesting an un-deletion of one of the image revisions at WP:REFUND, but this is one of Japanese games eventually localized for international releases. Now I'm torn, especially since Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturne (aka Shin Megami Tensei: Lucifer's Call) also omits its Roman numeral "III" for non-Japanese/overseas releases (more at Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturne#Localization). There's a difference between Nocturne and Dragon Quarter: Nocturne is the first entry of SMT to be released outside Japan, while previous Breath of Fire entries were released outside Japan long before Dragon Quarter. Here's the main question: shall the infobox image for Dragon Quarter be changed back to the North American box art (one of diffs before the change) for general consistency with other North American and European covers used at other VG articles or remain as-is, i.e. retain the Japanese cover? George Ho (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot: just in case, per WP:GUIDES, the VGBOX can be best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. George Ho (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Microman Zone Catalog 1975 Number 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1, 8, and 3a:

1) The toys are considered public domain in the source country (Japan), so the non-free catalog can be replaced with freely licensed images of the toys themselves (two such images are already in the article).

8) The catalog images are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) There are a large number of scans of non-free catalog covers, and should it be determined that a catalog cover is necessary, one (in the infobox) can suffice. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Microman Command Catalog 1977 Number 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1, 8, and 3a:

1) The toys are considered public domain in the source country (Japan), so the non-free catalog can be replaced with freely licensed images of the toys themselves (two such images are already in the article).

8) The catalog images are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) There are a large number of scans of non-free catalog covers, and should it be determined that a catalog cover is necessary, one (in the infobox) can suffice. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Microman Rescue Catalog 1979 Number 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1, 8, and 3a:

1) The toys are considered public domain in the source country (Japan), so the non-free catalog can be replaced with freely licensed images of the toys themselves (two such images are already in the article).

8) The catalog images are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) There are a large number of scans of non-free catalog covers, and should it be determined that a catalog cover is necessary, one (in the infobox) can suffice. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New Microman 1982 Catalog Number 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1, 8, and 3a:

1) The toys are considered public domain in the source country (Japan), so the non-free catalog can be replaced with freely licensed images of the toys themselves (two such images are already in the article).

8) The catalog images are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) There are a large number of scans of non-free catalog covers, and should it be determined that a catalog cover is necessary, one (in the infobox) can suffice. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Micro Change Mini Catalog Number 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1, 8, and 3a:

1) The toys are considered public domain in the source country (Japan), so the non-free catalog can be replaced with freely licensed images of the toys themselves (two such images are already in the article).

8) The catalog images are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) There are a large number of scans of non-free catalog covers, and should it be determined that a catalog cover is necessary, one (in the infobox) can suffice. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1984 - New Microman - Micro Change Stickers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1, 8, and 3a:

1) The toys are considered public domain in the source country (Japan), so the non-free catalog can be replaced with freely licensed images of the toys themselves (two such images are already in the article).

8) The catalog images are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) There are a large number of scans of non-free catalog covers, and should it be determined that a catalog cover is necessary, one (in the infobox) can suffice. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Microman Rescue e-Hobby 2002 Re-Issue Box.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 1, 8, and 3a:

1) The toys are considered public domain in the source country (Japan), so the non-free catalog can be replaced with freely licensed images of the toys themselves (two such images are already in the article).

8) The catalog images are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) There are a large number of scans of non-free catalog covers, and should it be determined that a catalog cover is necessary, one (in the infobox) can suffice. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daniel Radcliffe 1860.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate {{PD-self}} tag on a photo from 1860. Several other of this user's uploads are suspect and should probably be evaluated/deleted as well. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If the photo is actually from 1860, it's almost certainly in the public domain, however without a source, we can't keep it. TinEye came up with nothing, so unless someone else comes up with a source, Delete. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Microman Secret File Volume 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a:

8) Images of the manga covers are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) Should it be determined that an image of the manga covers does meet NFCC 8, there is still no need for both, and one should be deleted. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Microman Kodansha TV Magazine Manga Compliation Cover 1978.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a:

8) Images of the manga covers are not critical to the understanding of the article (on the toy line).

3a) Should it be determined that an image of the manga covers does meet NFCC 8, there is still no need for both, and one should be deleted. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tax Disc (1985).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and likely also 8 - There are 13 non-free images of the 1961 series, and most are just color variations. At most, 4 images (one of each style) are needed per 3a. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tax Disc (1986).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and likely also 8 - There are 13 non-free images of the 1961 series, and most are just color variations. At most, 4 images (one of each style) are needed per 3a. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tax Disc (1987).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and likely also 8 - There are 13 non-free images of the 1961 series, and most are just color variations. At most, 4 images (one of each style) are needed per 3a. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tax Disc (1992).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and likely also 8 - There are 13 non-free images of the 1961 series, and most are just color variations. At most, 4 images (one of each style) are needed per 3a. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tax Disc (1993).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 3a and likely also 8 - There are 13 non-free images of the 1961 series, and most are just color variations. At most, 4 images (one of each style) are needed per 3a. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lois Lane (DC Animated Universe).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lois Lane. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DC Super Hero Girls Lois Lane.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lois Lane. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lois Lane Margot kidder.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lois Lane. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lois Lane. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lois Lane Teri Hatcher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lois Lane. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lois Lane Erica Durance.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lois Lane. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration.

For this specific file, there's also an article specifically on the Smallville character with a different non-free image of Lois. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lois Lane (Elizabeth Tulloch).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lois Lane. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lois Lane and the Friendship Challenge cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. Excessive use of non-free content to illustrate the character. In this case, it's being used to illustrate a work that will very likely get its own article once it actually releases.

There's no discussion of the character's depiction in cited prose, this is being used for a purely decorative purpose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lois Lane Fallout.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. Excessive use of non-free content. In this case, it's being used to illustrate another work that's not the subject of this article (the character is, not the book). There's no discussion of the character's depiction in cited prose, this is being used for a purely decorative purpose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lex Luthor (Gene Hackman).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lex Luthor. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luthor Superman Returns.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lex Luthor. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lex Luthor. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luthor Smallville.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lex Luthor. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lex Luthor (Jon Cryer).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lex Luthor. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lex Luthor (DC Animated Universe).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC 8 and 3a. The article Lois Lane in other media is filled with non-free depictions of the character, who is already depicted heavily in Lex Luthor. These depictions are not the subject of critical commentary using cited prose, they are just there as decoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adrian Jacobs 2007 med.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References OTRS ticket 2007050110009977, which Josve05a checked and found that it does not confirm permission. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 22:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.