Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 September 9

September 9

File:Archibald Joyce (British Composer) obituary portrait.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since uploading this file, I have purchased a much better image of the subject that I'm pretty much certain is in the public domain: c:File:Archibald Joyce.jpg Assuming this is true, and I've not seriously misunderstood British copyright law, hosting this image is no longer necessary. Physeters^✉ 05:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. You are absolutely right, the new image is both better and free! Felix QW (talk) 12:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as replaceable with a free image. (It's definitely free for our purposes, regardless of British copyright law; Wikipedia goes by the US definition of public domain, which includes anything published before 1929. If it weren't public domain in Britain, we'd just remove it from Commons and host it here as {{PD-US-expired-abroad}}.) jlwoodwa (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sigil title screen.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2024 September 16. ✗plicit 23:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sigil title screen.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lucozade logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and replaced by vector version. Cloudbound (talk) 20:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2012 Packers Seahawks Final Play.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 19:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCCP #8, which states that an image's presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. The screenshot in question is just a snapshot of a controversial play, one that cannot be grasped by one still image. The crux of the play was who had possession of the ball and when did they have possession. This still image, at best, provides a difficult agglomeration of players, hands and a barely noticeable football. It does not provide clarity on the topic of the article and its omission would not be a detriment to the article. An example of an American football image that would be encyclopedic would be a player with both feet in bounds when the call was that he was out-of-bounds, or something similar that is clarified by a snapshot in time. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:10, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Kept at previous FFD. Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Similar concerns at two files I listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 September 3 that were just deleted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:NFCC#8 as currently used. Upon reviewing the text of the article, I found no substantial sourced critical commentary/coverage. -Fastily 01:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.