Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alan Enileev
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) —Alalch E. 10:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Three AFC revierwers declined by for notability and other junk issue, I am just nominating the draft as not proved notability per WP:GNG. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Drafts do not need to meet notability. The reason they are a draft is so that somebody can work on it to establish it as a viable topic for a mainspace article. None of the AFC reviewers have rejected the draft, and indeed ther eis one comment stating that the topic may be notable. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: As above, drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. I am also concerned that this is a retaliatory nomination, as the nominator's poor decline of this draft is a contributing reason as to why they were removed from the AfC reviewer list. Curbon7 (talk) 21:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Lack of notability is a reason to decline a draft. This is MFD, not AFC. A dead fish to the nominator. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:15, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Lack of notability is a reason to decline a draft but not a reason to delete a draft. Qwv (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.