Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giornorosso/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Giornorosso

Giornorosso (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
27 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

continuing an edit war at Model minority, started by previous sock user:Lootsucker WuhWuzDat 03:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I'm no sockpuppet, I just reverted edit because they deleted it without reason.--Beholdernig (talk) 03:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
  •  Possible:

Tiptoety talk 04:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


05 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

The two socks listed edit the share the same article (weather, Islam, and race) interests as the previous socks. Note, I already duck blocked Me ne frego. I'd really appreciate a sleeper check here. Based on the logs, log 1, and log 2, it seems evident that multiple accounts were created during the same time period. Need CU to find out any others missing. Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 19:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

04 July 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


See this discussion. 81M (talk) 15:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked by User:WilliamH, nothing else to do here. 81M (talk) 00:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

28 July 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

I'm not familiar with this user's background. I noticed a couple edits to Race and intelligence by this IP and when I checked the user talk page I noticed they had been blocked previously as a sock of indef blocked Thonos (per WP:DUCK), who had edited similar articles on race. What I think is going on is that the IP is static and so it is the same user avoiding a block and thus a longer block is likely necessary. Sædontalk 08:07, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 IP blocked for one month for block evasion and long term edit warring/tendentious editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]