Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scottydog77/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Scottydog77

Scottydog77 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date May 27 2009, 10:07 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Allstarecho
  • Scottydog77's contributions and 217.37.220.150's contributions to the same articles on Wikipedia, both started editing in August 2008:
    • 217.37.220.150's blanking of Scottydog77's talk page twice today. Second time here after I posted the sockpuppet thread notice.
    • Both users edit warring at David Ogden Stiers per (Scottydog77:[1]) (217.37.220.150: [2] [3] [4] [5])
    • Both users commenting at Talk:David Ogden Stiers, one right after the other, with 217.37.220.150 commenting in support of Scottydog7 by name. See [6] and [7].
    • It appears that anytime either of them reverted someone else's edits on any given article, they were restoring each other's edits that had been removed by another user. For example: Virgin Atlantic Airways: Introduction of content via undo by Scottydog77 here - removal of Scottydog7's edit by MilborneOne here - Undo of MilbourneOne by 217.37.220.150 here. Numerous examples of these 2, the master and the sock, doing this all over Wikipedia in the same articles.
  • Mancunianboy, an account created in February, editing some of the same articles as Scottydog77 and 217.37.220.150 per contribs history with the same arguments. Probably a meatpuppet but worth checking.
  • All 3 editors insisting on the insertion of BLP violating content at David Ogden Stiers, and socking/meating via the talk page of the article as well trying to gain a consensus to include the content regardless of the BLP violation. See Talk:David Ogden Stiers/Archives/2013#Gay?.
  • All 3 editors fail to sign their comments on talk pages (WP:DUCK). See SineBot attack all 3.
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Do what you want....I do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottydog77 (talkcontribs) 10:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by - ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 10:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]



Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk declined Plenty of evidence to block without CU. — Jake Wartenberg 14:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Accounts blocked indef. I think someone else got the IP. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]