Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 October 24

< October 23	October 25 >

October 24

Template:RWDM Brussels FC squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RWDM Brussels FC squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Contains a list of footballers playing for RWDM Brussels FC, however that team was dissolved in the summer of 2014 after going bankrupt. Pelotas^talk^|^contribs 21:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - defunct club, therefore does not need a 'current' squad navigation template. 14:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Delete - Serves no useful purpose... JMHamo (talk) 13:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox closed London station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Paris Network main content

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merged (nac) Frietjes (talk) 18:29, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Paris Network main content (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Effectively single-use. Sub-template of {{Infobox Paris Network}} (and formerly another template, since deleted) into which it should be Subst:. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yet {{Infobox Paris Network}} is being used in other articles. Any info on how to Subst: would be welcome, though. Then, effectively, this template can be deleted. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓ 07:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That the parent template is being used does not mean that we need to keep this sub-template; the content can be written directly into the main template. To demonstrate this, and test for any issues, I've now Subst: the nominated template into {{Infobox Paris Network}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:38, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! I wasn't familiar with the term 'Subst:' so thought it involved something more complicated. Thanks. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓ 15:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, delete away. THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓ 15:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

move/redirect to preserve attribution. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Might be good to move/redirect this 4kb thing per Frietjes —PC -XT + 04:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Paris Metro line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Taiwan station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox T&W Metro station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 17 November 2014.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete and replace with {{Infobox rail line}} Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox rail line}}. Only 18 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'm going to move the articles which are all about public transit in Frankfurt to the new template. --Melkom (talk) 20:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant - and so is this opinion. Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
replace/redirect Frietjes (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Replace and redirect per above —PC -XT + 05:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox London Tram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Congressional caucus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, with no objection to userfication on request Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Congressional caucus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused (could userfy). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Election Campaign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Electoral reform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Massachusetts SJC case

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete with no objections to deletion. No quorum.

Template:Infobox Massachusetts SJC case (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused wrapper, after I Subst: the only four instances in articles. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:43, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Virginia Supreme Court case

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused. No quorum, no objections to deletion Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Virginia Supreme Court case (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused wrapper, after I Subst: the only three uses in articles. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Australian university ranking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, or any strong opinions in either direction. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Australian university ranking (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Do we need this? It's only used on two articles. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:32, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep for now, but I would potentially support the merger of Category:University and college rankings templates. Frietjes (talk) 21:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:USL Fan Derbies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:35, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USL Fan Derbies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only three links. Fenix down (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete after adding any necessary see also links. Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Convert/words

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete template.Jimp 10:18, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Convert/words (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template proposes to do unit conversions based on expressions in words. It deals with both written-out numbers and rough expressions like "a few" and "several". The written-out number functionality is redundant since {{convert}} now has the capacity to spell numbers out. The conversions based on rough expressions are more problematic and often give quite strange results.

A major problem with this template is that the conversion often comes out sounding not so rough. That is, it is giving use false precision (see the {{convert}} talk page for more information).

There seems to be no clear and simple way of avoiding this problem. Rough expressions are not really the kind of thing you convert with a template.Jimp 04:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The editor can always spell out the desired wordings, while checking for being sensible. -DePiep (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "{{convert/words |a few|kPa}} → a few kilopascals (0.44–0.73 psi)" is one of the examples this page gives, presumably as an example of correct usage. I am not convinced that this sort of conversion is at all likely to be helpful; it's more misleading than anything else. --ais523 16:50, 24 October 2014 (U T C)
delete, problematic. Frietjes (talk) 23:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ais523's example. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.