Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/June 2022

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MainCriteriaInstructionsNominationsFAQBacklog drivesMentorshipReview circlesDiscussionReassessmentReport

The June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive is a one-month-long effort to reduce the backlog of Good Article nominations. Please review articles according to the GA criteria and the Manual of Style; we also recommend the essays What the Good article criteria are not and Reviewing good articles. The co-ordinators for this drive are Buidhe, Hog Farm, Trainsandotherthings, Harrias, Kavyansh.Singh, and Shushugah. The drive began on 1 June 2022 at 00:00:00 (UTC) and ended on 30 June 2022 at 23:59:59 (UTC).

The ultimate goal of this backlog elimination drive is to promote high-quality reviewing and cut the number of outstanding GANs and in particular those which have been in the queue 90 days or more. Awards will be given out to those individuals who do the most work in helping reduce the size of the backlog.

Basic guidelines

[edit]
  1. Give preference to older nominations. While any review counts for the drive, nominations which have been in the queue the longest, identified below, should be given extra consideration, and are eligible for extra points.
  2. Log completed GANs here. If you complete a GAN for an article, don't forget to list it here so that you can get credit for the review.
  3. Review thoroughly. To be counted in the drive, if the article passes GAN, the review must (1) address all of the GA criteria (2) provide constructive suggestions for improvement (3) verify at least some citations in the article. If the article fails GAN, the review must (1) explain why the article does not meet the GA criteria and (2) provide concrete recommendations for improving the article to GA quality. The coordinators welcome help from experienced reviewers in checking reviews during the drive; please apply this checklist.
  4. Stick with it. An article isn't improved if it remains on hold for months. Instead, make the smaller corrections, make sure the primary writer is actively editing, and make the pass/fail judgement if concerns are/are not addressed in a timely matter. Generally, it is standard for a GA review to be on hold for seven days, although the reviewer may close their review when they see fit.
  5. Have fun. We're here to help bring these articles up to their fullest potential and hence improve the overall quality of the encyclopedia. If you do not enjoy doing that, then there is no motivation to improve these articles and the encyclopedia as a whole.

Progress

[edit]

Numbers are reported as described here.

Date Outstanding
nominations
Unreviewed
nominations
Change since
previous day[N 1]
Change since
beginning[N 1]
1 June 2022 602 520
2 June 2022 602 487 Positive decrease 33 (6.3%) Positive decrease 33 (6.3%)
3 June 2022 588 456 Positive decrease 31 (6.4%) Positive decrease 64 (12.3%)
4 June 2022 583 446 Positive decrease 10 (2.2%) Positive decrease 74 (14.2%)
5 June 2022 584 433 Positive decrease 13 (2.9%) Positive decrease 87 (16.7%)
6 June 2022 563 412 Positive decrease 21 (4.8%) Positive decrease 108 (20.8%)
7 June 2022 547 398 Positive decrease 14 (3.4%) Positive decrease 122 (23.5%)
8 June 2022 536 388 Positive decrease 10 (2.5%) Positive decrease 132 (25.4%)
9 June 2022 533 384 Positive decrease  4 (1%) Positive decrease 136 (26.2%)
10 June 2022 533 385 Negative increase  1 (0.3%) Positive decrease 135 (26%)
11 June 2022 529 381 Positive decrease  4 (1%) Positive decrease 139 (26.7%)
12 June 2022 528 379 Positive decrease  2 (0.5%) Positive decrease 141 (27.1%)
13 June 2022 527 382 Negative increase  3 (0.8%) Positive decrease 138 (26.5%)
14 June 2022 523 379 Positive decrease  3 (0.8%) Positive decrease 141 (27.1%)
15 June 2022 519 378 Positive decrease  1 (0.3%) Positive decrease 142 (27.3%)
16 June 2022 519 374 Positive decrease  4 (1.1%) Positive decrease 146 (28.1%)
17 June 2022 513 371 Positive decrease  3 (0.8%) Positive decrease 149 (28.7%)
18 June 2022 508 372 Negative increase  1 (0.3%) Positive decrease 148 (28.5%)
19 June 2022 505 368 Positive decrease  4 (1.1%) Positive decrease 152 (29.2%)
20 June 2022 506 373 Negative increase  5 (1.4%) Positive decrease 147 (28.3%)
21 June 2022 504 374 Negative increase  1 (0.3%) Positive decrease 146 (28.1%)
22 June 2022 504 376 Negative increase  2 (0.5%) Positive decrease 144 (27.7%)
23 June 2022 501 373 Positive decrease  3 (0.8%) Positive decrease 147 (28.3%)
24 June 2022 493 364 Positive decrease  9 (2.4%) Positive decrease 156 (30%)
25 June 2022 494 366 Negative increase  2 (0.5%) Positive decrease 154 (29.6%)
26 June 2022 490 361 Positive decrease  5 (1.4%) Positive decrease 159 (30.6%)
27 June 2022 485 357 Positive decrease  4 (1.1%) Positive decrease 163 (31.3%)
28 June 2022 485 363 Negative increase  6 (1.7%) Positive decrease 157 (30.2%)
29 June 2022 481 365 Negative increase  2 (0.6%) Positive decrease 155 (29.8%)
30 June 2022 477 364 Positive decrease  1 (0.3%) Positive decrease 156 (30%)
1 July 2022 473 366 Negative increase  2 (0.5%) Positive decrease 154 (29.6%)
  1. ^ a b Change refers only to unreviewed nominations.

Awards

[edit]

To receive an award, please include your name and the number of reviews you have completed as part of this drive. Awards will be given by the co-ordinators after this drive ends.

This is the scheme for the awards:

At least 3 points: The Invisible Barnstar

At least 7 points: The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar

At least 15 points: The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

At least 20 points: The Reviewer Barnstar

At least 30 points: The Multiple Good Article Reviewer Barnstar

At least 40 points: The WikiProject Good Articles Medal of Merit

At least 60 points: The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia

In addition, the person who accumulates the most points during the backlog elimination drive will receive the Content Review Medal of Merit

Points

[edit]
  • One point is awarded for every article reviewed.
  • If a nomination is identified in the below "List of qualifying old articles", the review of that article is worth an extra half point (except for quick-fails).

List of qualifying old articles

[edit]

The following list contains all nominations that are currently 90+ days old. A review of these articles is thus worth an extra half point.

  • After starting a review of one of these articles, please remove it from the list
  • This list will be updated as additional nominations become 90+ days old
  • If nearly all nominations that are 90+ days old are placed on review, then nominations that are 75+ days old will become eligible for the extra half point. Subsequently, if nearly all nominations that are 75+ days old are placed on review, then nominations that are 60+ days old will become eligible, and so on.
Article Nomination Notes
Kendari 22 January 2022 150+ days old
Russell Ebert 28 January 2022 150+ days old
Kylian Mbappé 21 February 2022 120+ days old
Connor McDavid 22 February 2022 120+ days old
1963 San Diego Chargers season 27 February 2022 120+ days old
229 West 43rd Street 27 February 2022 120+ days old
Gunungsitoli 3 March 2022
Neil Simon Theatre 3 March 2022
Jeanine Áñez 5 March 2022
August Wilson Theatre 6 March 2022
Seanad Éireann career of Mary Robinson 11 March 2022
Legal career of Mary Robinson 11 March 2022
International Building (Rockefeller Center) 13 March 2022
X-bar theory 15 March 2022
Dangal (film) 18 March 2022
K-61 (Kansas highway) 19 March 2022
Lechmere station 19 March 2022
Brad Hand 20 March 2022
Christian Porter 20 March 2022
Zdravko Ponoš 21 March 2022
Verdi Square 22 March 2022
K-57 (Kansas highway) 24 March 2022
Williamsburgh Savings Bank Tower 25 March 2022
Silsila (1981 film) 26 March 2022
RKO Keith's Theater (Flushing, Queens) 29 March 2022
Spencer Knight 30 March 2022
Style of the Georgian sovereign 31 March 2022
Clayton Keller] 31 March 2022

List of abandoned reviews

[edit]

The below articles have had their nominations abandoned, or need a second opinion.

  • Reviews of these articles count towards points in the same way as other articles (1 point per review; 1.5 point if old).
Article Review page Notes
Ed Bradley Talk:Ed Bradley/GA1 Qualifies for extra .5 point
Hermann Hoth Talk:Hermann Hoth/GA1 Qualifies for extra .5 point
Dick Molpus Talk:Dick Molpus/GA1

Running total

[edit]

Keep a running total of your reviewing in the Participants section below by creating your own list. Only passes and fails will be recognised as completing a review. If necessary, you can put the article on hold if the article needs to be edited further to be passed. Each of your reviews should be included in your list. Article reviews started before 30 June but completed after 30 June can be included in the running total – however should be completed as quickly as possible to avoid being too late. Reviews started before 1 June do not count. Please state if the article is a pass, fail, or on hold. Make sure you follow up on reviews that you have started or placed on hold.

A sample review section is below; all sections start with a fourth-level header containing the editor's username and the {{Div col}} and {{Div col end}} templates. Between those templates, each article reviewed is given its own line. Use the "GA" icon line for an article that passes, the "FGAN" icon line for an article that fails, the "GAH" icon line for an article where the initial review is complete and has been placed on hold, and the "GAN" icon line for an article where the review has started but has not yet been placed on hold. (Change "GAN" and "GAH" to "GA" or "FGAN" when the article passes or fails.) If the nomination is identified above as old when you begin your review, add "(old)" after the link to the nomination page. Following the {{Div col end}} template are two lines to tabulate each participant's total number of articles reviewed and the total number of old nominations reviewed.

Participants

[edit]
====[[User:Username|Username]]====
{{Div col}}
#{{icon|GA}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (old)
#{{icon|FGAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]]
#{{icon|GAH}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (old)
#{{icon|GAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]]
{{Div col end}}
<small>'''Articles reviewed:'''
<br>'''Old nominations reviewed:'''</small>


Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4

  1. James Campbell (British Army officer, died 1745) Green tickY Nicely done ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 16:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. William Trench, 5th Earl of Clancarty Green tickY Hog Farm Talk 15:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Henry Lytton Green tickY ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Robert of Bridlington Green tickY Hog Farm Talk 20:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Evening Bells (painting) Green tickYKavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Observations Made During a Voyage Round the World Green tickY very nice and thorough review of the references! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Sayf ol-Dowleh Red XN unclear if any reference reviews were done. Feedback was mainly prose/grammar related. Pinging User:Amitchell125 ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Fluvidona anodonta Green tickY ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Wildlife of North Macedonia Green tickY ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Whitehead's spiderhunter Green tickY ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Crimson-headed partridge Green tickY ideally a more explicit review of references would be preferred, but the review does include feedback on missing ref in some cases. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Gaius Antius Restio Green tickY ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Henri Coutard Green tickY ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ian Donald Green tickY ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Articles reviewed: 13
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 14
Old nominations reviewed: 9

Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1

Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 2

Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:

  1. Dansby Swanson Red XN no suggestion for improvement, no source verification (see instructions) (t · c) buidhe 01:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Noah Syndergaard Red XN see above

Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1

  1. Power pop (old) Red XN, speedy pass seems reasonable but review is way too short to be eligible. With an 11 day old account, I’d recommend focusing on learning ropes of Wikipedia editing first. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 16:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 1

  1. Jacqueline Jackson (old) Red XN — not thorough enough to claim points — Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1

Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1

Articles reviewed: 6
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 3

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

  1. Grand Bargain (humanitarian reform) (old) Red XN Too brief, no evidence of source checks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Polish proverbs (old) Red XN Too brief, no evidence of source checks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Missundaztood (old) Red XN Too brief, no evidence of source checks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rhea Seddon (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Naushadnama (old) Green tickYKavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Khosrow Mirza (old) Green tickY - fair quick-fail (source-text issues) Hog Farm Talk 22:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Keterkaitan Keterikatan (old) Red XN Too brief, no evidence of source checks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Lambert Gas and Gasoline Engine Company (old) Red XN No spotchecks, and on a Coldwell nom that is unacceptable. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fingolfin (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Walking Home: Travels with a Troubadour on the Pennine Way (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Lamar Parks (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Union Automobile Company (old) Red XN Short review, no spotchecks done. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. He-Man as a gay icon (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Poems and Songs of Middle Earth (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  15. J. D. Hammer (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Eugene W. Caldwell (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 16

Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 8

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 3

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 9
Old nominations reviewed: 2

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 11
Old nominations reviewed: 8

Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:

Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 2

  1. Mirabel Madrigal ? Thorough review but unclear if source checks were done (see GAN drive instructions #3) (t · c) buidhe 05:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Buidhe: Checked citations but found no noticeable discrepancies, so I didn't bring them up in the review. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Jesse Lawson

Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

  1. All Along the Watchtower Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2020 Green tickY (t · c) buidhe 07:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Omkring tiggarn från Luossa Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021 Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Bad Girl (Madonna song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022 Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Selfish (Dimitri Vegas & Like Mike and Era Istrefi song) Red XN No evidence of source checks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Alpha (Selena album) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Karma (Anxhela Peristeri song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ciega, Sordomuda Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Champagne Problems (album) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  12. "Heroes" (David Bowie song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Fader Bergström Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Cyprus in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010 Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Nå skruva Fiolen Red XN No evidence of source checks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Moviestar (Harpo song) Green tickY Although actually a fail. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2009 Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  18. The Pussycat Dolls Tour Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  19. R2K: The Concert Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Mi Mayor Venganza Red XN No evidence of source checks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

  1. Google Me (Kim Zolciak song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. There's a Honey Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Amiga Mía Green tickY no source checks done, see instructions (t · c) buidhe 20:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mozzart (Mozzik album) (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Artificial Intelligence (EP) Green tickY (t · c) buidhe 16:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Supersize (album) (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Clavado en un Bar Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Lady Like (song) Green tickY (t · c) buidhe 07:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Butterfly (Kylie Minogue song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sidewalks (album) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  11. The Melodic Blue Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Colors Green tickYNo review done Looks fine now (per this edit) — Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Don't Blame Me (Taylor Swift song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Contra la Corriente (song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jokero Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mad at Disney Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Lots of Nothing Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Dejaría Todo Green tickY Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Kylie Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  20. This Is Me Trying Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  21. More Hearts Than Mine Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  22. You See Colours Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Sweet Insanity Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Mr. Songbird Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  25. American Girl (Bonnie McKee song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Gubben Noak Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Rosenkrieg (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  28. The Great Lost Kinks Album Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Mi PC Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  30. The Blue Bird (Stanford) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Anthology (Selena album) Green tickY Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  32. La Llave de Mi Corazón Red XN No evidence of source checks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Young (Tulisa song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  34. All My Hits: Todos Mis Exitos Vol. 2 Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Faded Seaside Glamour Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Brian Wilson (album) (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Momentos Intimos Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Tú (Shakira song) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

  1. One Astor Plaza (old) Green tickY Welcome to GAN reviewing! Overall the review looks great, however, I'm wondering whether this review meets #3 of the GAN drive instructions. Specifically you state, "No original research." but it's not clear how you came to that conclusion. To be confident the article has no original research, at least some of the sources need to be checked to see if they support the text. (t · c) buidhe 05:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    buidhe Good afternoon (or morning/evening depending on your time zone), I did ensure to do some source checking. I sought help from a mentor first before finalising my review. By source checking, I would go through the article and randomly check certain sentences that are cited and then ensure the reference supported the claim. I did not do this for all 250+ references, but I remember doing at least 10-12. Is that sufficient? Do you need me to note this in the actual notes next time to be more clear? Thanks for the welcome, I want to become involved in reviewing articles because seeing good work is helping me make my own better. I am intentionally choosing quality articles from an experienced editor (and seeking advice on my reviews) before I progress to anything which is more likely to fail and therefore be a more contentious decision. MaxnaCarta (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That's fine! I'd say best practice is to say something like "Checked refs #3, #7, #22, and #31 in this version of the article, but it's not strictly necessary. (t · c) buidhe 05:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Walter Kerr Theatre (old) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Booth Theatre (old) Red XN (Short) review done by a different user completely? Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: am a new GA reviewer. I would appreciate any comments on my reviews and confirmation if I am doing them properly. I want to help, not create more work so please let me know if I am achieving that aim. Also, I note when I started the reviews, the bot added notices to the nominators talk page and did everything properly. Both times when I finished the review though, (following instructions and using the templates), the bot never left notices on nom. Also, I notice the Good Article icon has not updated, it is on the right hand side however the class icon remains B. Thanks MaxnaCarta (talk) 03:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 3

Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 2

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

  1. Greece-Turkey relations (Quickfail) Green tickY (t · c) buidhe 17:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @User:MrLinkinPark333 If I resolve all the issues raised in the next week, would you be willing to review the article again and go deeper than just the quick fail? A lot of work went into this article this year and the issues are easily resolved by me.
    @Buidhe can you get this counted as a new point as incentive? Elias (talk) 20:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Left note at Talk:Greece–Turkey relations MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blue Hill Meteorological Observatory (Quickfail) Green tickY Hog Farm Talk 21:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 2022 Kentucky Derby Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008 (Quickfail) Green tickY Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1

I'm not going to finish my review in time, but just wanted to say thank you for running this drive and that it inspired me to start a review. :)

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 1

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 2

Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:

Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0

  1. North Carolina Highway 124 Red XN no source checks mentioned (see instructions) (t · c) buidhe 23:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. North Carolina Highway 67

Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0