Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Participants

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Userbox

[edit]
Code:Results in:
{{User WikiProject Spam}}
This user is a participant in WikiProject Spam.

If you prefer not to use userboxes, you can add yourself to Category:WikiProject Spam participants. Code: [[Category:WikiProject Spam participants]]

List

[edit]

This is the list of participants of WikiProject Spam. You are more than welcome to add yourself to this list and become a member of our "voluntary link spam fighting brigade". Help us to keep Wikipedia Spam free.

  1. User:TruxtVerified Fight against Spam/Vandalism.
  1. A diehard editor *** WIKIPEDIA SPAMMERS, BANNED for vandalizing and attempting to destroy Wikipedia. ***
  2. Joel.Miles925 Longtime vandalfighter, first-time spamfighter!
  3. HackedBotato Spam goes BOOM when HackedBotato joins in on the fun!
  4. Abhiraam.chyren (talk · contribs) 13:01:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
  5. Imadeausername! (talk·contribs) 20:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. SriramPGDLitt (talk·contribs) 11:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. GalenaMcGregor (talk) 11:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sephiroth878 Killing SPAM- WITH MAH LAZEH!
  9. YoSoyUnHamster You have my bow. Nock…Draw…FIRE!!!1!
  10. User:Wackywace - Like wasp killer, but spam killer. I kill spam. And, when they annoy me, wasps.
  11. User:Rocksteady888 Straight Up Spam Killah
  12. Hintss (talk) 01:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Vinh1000 - Spam is bad. People Steal Our Information From It.
  14. Urthogie 03:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jdavidb
  16. Maxim Stoyalov
  17. JFW | T@lk
  18. PhilipO - count me in. Linkspam is a serious issue. Wiki is not a link farm. --PhilipO 23:37, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
  19. Tangentidea - Sure, I'll watch for it in my travels.
  20. JesseW, the juggling janitor 18:18, 29 September 2005 (UTC) I've fought over IP address for a while, and I'd like to help, also.
  21. GraemeL (talk) 15:27, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. fvw* 20:58, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. A bit iffy Excellent idea, Jdavidb. I very willing to help with this.
  24. Yus indeed - Include me in CanOfWorms (talk) 15:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Idont Havaname 04:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC) I've been finding and reverting linkspam - probably several hundred instances of it now - during the last several months. It seems to be the kind of vandalism that really goes unnoticed for the most part, and it's time we start enforcing policies against it.[reply]
  26.  Perfecto 03:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC): Amateur linkspam fighter here. I began Template:Cleanup-spam and people have begun using it. I even see anon ips removing linkspam because of it <wink>. I like GraemeL's Watchlist idea.[reply]
  27. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-06 05:15:02Z Great! I've been fighting spam ever since I registered; pages like Automobile are particularly susceptible. Nice template, Perfecto; I'll have to remember that!
  28. ∴ here…♠ Just cut 23 links from Electronic music, plenty more to go.
  29. Aude 01:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC) - I'm in, though have also started a similar effort at WikiProject External links (perhaps join these two efforts? see this talk page and comment).[reply]
  30. Cheesejoff 19:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC) I volunteer to help fight the spam![reply]
  31. User:JiFish - Why did I not know about this project?
  32. Just zis Guy - an excellent idea, count me in.
  33. Matthew Brown (T:C) 05:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Dominick (TALK) I have been doing this anyway, might as well have some folk to commiserate with...
  35. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:38, 27 December 2005 (UTC) glad to able to help.[reply]
  36. Tεxτurε
  37. Shanel - The perfect compliment to the CVU. :p
  38. ike9898 22:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Paleorthid 17:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC) - Using Perfecto's template (thank you!) on Crime prevention through environmental design[reply]
  40. Kevin 20:42, 31 December 2005 (UTC) - Fighting wikispammers turns me on.[reply]
  41. D-Day 21:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC) I'm not a huge deletionist, but I'll try to help.[reply]
  42. Aapo Laitinen 13:36, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Cool, already doing it anyway. Tufflaw 07:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mrtea (talk) - I hate linkspam, count me in.
  45. Ohnoitsjamie I'm in.
  46. nixie 16:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Links that are less informative than the page they appear on should be removed on site![reply]
  47. Benoy Just hate spam!
  48. Dalbury(Talk) 03:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Why not? I've already go articles on my watchlist solely because I back-tracked link-spamers to them.[reply]
  49. Deathphoenix 03:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC) I love SPAM, but I hate spam.[reply]
  50. WAvegetarian (talk) (email) (contribs) just reverted corvette article
  51. Randal L. Schwartz 20:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC) saying thanks for the cleanup-spam template... I've got a few things on my watchlist to which this is getting added![reply]
  52. Quarl (talk)
  53. Sleepyhead (|talk)
  54. Khalid hassani 14:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Trying to keep WP the interesting place it is, trying to help so that it won't be transformed into a commercial playground.[reply]
  55. Locke Cole • t • c 17:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC) As often as I revert this stuff, you'd think I'd have heard of this project before now. =)[reply]
  56. No Guru - Great idea. Will keep my eyes open for spammers.
  57. tregoweth - I've been cleaning spam out for a while now; might as well be slightly official... :) 23:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Sean (talk || contribs)
  59. DrCash - I hate spam.
  60. Heah talk - I too hate spam.
  61. Peter McGinley. An important project on Wikipedia which I simply must be a part of.
  62. --NaconKantari 03:38, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Winter 21:56, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Robin Patterson 02:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC) - I have a spam patrol list on some of my userpages: the "Recent changes" pages of a wiktionary, a wikibooks, and nine wikicities. Most days I find something. I give linkspammers "1 year" in the cooler, though I see the official blocking guideline maximum is one month.[reply]
  65. Alan Au 08:19, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Archer7 17:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC) Nothing against web advertising, but Wikipedia is not the place for it.[reply]
  67. Pattersonc 21:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Liamcb 09:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC) i just hate spam![reply]
  69. Mostlyharmless 01:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC) advertising is bad; on wikipedia it's terrible![reply]
  70. Dracion 16:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC) i hate spam, especially on something as easily hacked as wikipedia! I will destroy it by, er...eating it![reply]
  71. Avi 01:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC) -- Spam is not kosher ;-)[reply]
  72. Caravaca 07:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. FungusFromYuggoth 20:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. *drew 10:21, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. ccwaters 18:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Monkeyman 04:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Spamtastic![reply]
  77. Pjacobi 13:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC) -- IMHO en: is weak in anti-SPAM policy (compared to de:)[reply]
  78. By all means, please share any proposals from de which have worked! Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 03:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Trysha 05:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC) - I have been looking for this.[reply]
  80. Archstanton 20:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC) - Count me in, and please keep an eye out for a couple of persistent link spammers at Selby. Thanks.[reply]
  81. 65.110.157.216 02:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Bugwit grunt / scribbles 03:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Barrylb 04:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Jehochman 04:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Not that I join Wikiprojects much, but I already revert quite a lot of spam - Solipsist 20:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Anca 19:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ambuj Saxena (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Jinxed I'm strongly against it - they should spam elsewhere.
  89. TheJabberwock 02:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC) - The fact that this much discussion happened about one user's possible linkspam is a strong indication that the process is flawed.[reply]
  90. FeldBum Trying to do my best to help.
  91. Straif I found myself cleaning up vandalism, and then some linkspam caught my eye...
  92. Epl18 I'm reading the stuff anyway, and I need some practice.
  93. theKeith - SPAM, you've got to love it... on toast.
  94. Seriocomic 12:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Nelson50 - I've removed some spam, guess I'd better learn to do it properly.
  96. Orangutan - I'll play too! Warned off a driving school that was spamming. They stopped, so warnings do work on occasion.
  97. ThomasTechnologies - I'm always game to stop a few spammers when I can.
  98. Loren 01:42, 5 April 2006 (UTC) Excellent, I look forward to pitching in.[reply]
  99. General Eisenhower I joined this project for my community service.
  100. Feezo (Talk) Don't forget to use the talk page to ask for second opinions and backup when dealing with spammers.
  101. AbsolutDan (talk) SPAM is good food. Spam is poison. I am... home.
  102. Divs001 (talk) I am a Spam-Buster and My Mission Starts now.
  103. Nnp 09:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. graham87
  105. Spamlart - I've helped anonymously for a while to clean up link spam, I love seeing commercial companys listing their own products. Have already came across other peoples hard work for e.g GraemeL (talk) and thought I'd chip in
  106. Deli nk 21:08, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Ray-Ray
  108. Pollinator - Been fighting linkspam for quite awhile
  109. Xinit 19:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Paleorthid 00:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Dcflyer 10:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Lewispb 21:10, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  113. BJK 14:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Been doing this for awhile now but it's nice to have something formal like.[reply]
  114. Alias Flood - Been fighting vandalism and spam for some time now.
  115. Gregorof - New at all this. Hate spam, want to help. 02:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Pascal.Tesson 21:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC) -- Count me in.[reply]
  117. Nandesuka 15:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC) I'm here. And I'm going to be creating a Wikiproject for a similar-but-different need soon.[reply]
  118. Zagsa 02:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Great idea, I'm in.[reply]
  119. SaNdY 03:30, 2 July 2006 (UTC) I'll be glad to join![reply]
  120. Kevin_b_er 00:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Great project. Need to cut down on the spam.[reply]
  121. Sean Whitton 16:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Brian 00:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]
  123. KrakatoaKatie 21:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC) I'm sick of finding link farms and spammers on RC patrol - it has to stop.[reply]
  124. Oldelpaso 08:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Andeh 09:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC). Just removed the same spam link from 50+ articles, sigh..[reply]
  126. Cleanupman 20:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC) What the name implies cleaning up spam[reply]
  127. Hyerim8807 21:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Spammers need to be stopped! go wikipedia spam zappers![reply]
  128. Picaroon. Just noticed this project. Having had to do this [1] a couple of hours ago, I'm in.
  129. A. B. 23:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC) count me in.[reply]
  130. GrandTeton Bye Bye Spam.
  131. Sergio Ballestrero 14:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Howard the Duck
  133. Chuchunezumi 04:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC) I look forward to learning more about keeping Wikipedia spam-free. Cheers![reply]
  134. Bcnviajero 16:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC). Count me in. This is a real menace. I have been paying special attention to articles on places in the world which receive a lot of tourism. These seem particularly prone to both commercial spammers and "vanity publishing", such as links to people's musings on their trip and holiday snaps.[reply]
  135. Bcnviajero 16:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  136. Eleschinski2000 00:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  137. SB_Johnny | talk - been here a while... apparently putting the userbox on your page doesn't really sign you up here?
  138. Ngard039 12:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC) - Ok. I'll look for it.[reply]
  139. Tomlouie | talk 17:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  140. ST47 14:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Han-Kwang 00:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Az1568 15:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Wikipediarules2221 19:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC) Link spam is one of my pet peeves![reply]
  144. lucasbfr Nice idea! Luk 16:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  145. JHunterJ 19:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Casper2k3 Casper2k3 20:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Nigel (Talk) 09:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC) - been removing it for some time so might as well be here![reply]
  148. Valfontis 20:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  149. ~Inkington 19:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Haakon 16:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Forastero 12:15 Pacific Time, 1 September 2006. I've seen some nasty spamming that can't and shouldn't be allowed to exist. I'm in!
  152. Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  153. I'm in! Scienceman123 talk 02:35, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  154. globaledits I'm in, too...
  155. Espresso Addict 13:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC) -- I've been removing spam for months, but will attempt to do it more professionally in future.[reply]
  156. Kribbeh 17:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC) - I've been looking for something constructive to do and to find a nice place to start on Wikipedia. Count me in.[reply]
  157. Marty Goldberg 13:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC) I'm in, to many spam links in the article subjects I'm interested in.[reply]
  158. User:Philosopher06 10:14 PM EST, 4 October 2006
  159. Wyatt Riot. I'm game.
  160. AussieWiki2006 06:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC) Might as well do something useful.[reply]
  161. Chocolatepizza
  162. Cpuwhiz11 Sounds like a good idea
  163. Lttlkiwi 03:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Like the site, like to help.[reply]
  164. Mushroom (Talk) 00:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  165. JFreeman 17:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  166. PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  167. agp16 - Absolutely. I'm tired of just wiping spam links without any organized way of preventing them from coming back!
  168. Martinp23 - Great initiative - WP:NOT and indiscriminate collection of links!
  169. Fishywoon 07:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Dylan Lake 00:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Khoikhoi 02:52, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Eagle (ask me for help) 00:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ...err... I probably better join as I built the bot for #wikipedia-spam[reply]
  173. Nick 00:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC) (normally in #wikipedia-spam channel too)[reply]
  174.  Satori Son 01:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC) - This problem gets bigger every day. More than happy to do my part.[reply]
  175. Serenaacw03:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Shadow1 (talk)--Built the OTHER bot for #wikipedia-spam.
  177. B33R Talk • Contribs Seeing how I spend half my WikiTime removing link spam, I might as well join up!
  178. jdboi661 YEP ILL HELP
  179. SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 03:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Gerry Ashton
  181. Squadcar56 I'll help
  182.  drybittermelon (talk．contribs) 09:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC) - glad to be of service[reply]
  183. Kafziel Talk I'm in.
  184. hu12 --forgot to add, went straight to work. Been "in" since April 21, 2006. oh well for being #86. The list has grown, this is good!
  185. J.S (T/C) Been working mostly to fight YouTube linkspam. I might branch out further after current project is wrapped up. (22:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC))
  186. Sarah Ewart 15:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  187. MER-C - mainly corporate vanity, spambots and advertisements masquerading as articles.
  188. Soms 04:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  189. 67.117.130.181 13:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  190. See 01, 02 and 03 for details about my current efforts --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 06:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  191. FisherQueen Down with spam!
  192. Sinned 17:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Alucard 20:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Will do my little bit to try to help fight it. Great idea for a project![reply]
  194. Masky 02:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC) The end of spam is near and approaching.[reply]
  195. 76.170.239.56 Pleased to help.
  196. Veinor Joined a while ago, been meaning to add my name to this list, but never got around to it. Glad to help in any case!
  197. FirefoxMan
  198. CiaranG
  199. Dayn believes he should join in at the recommendation of others.
  200. I hate spam. --James, La gloria è a dio 02:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  201. JoeSmack Talk 17:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  202. MKS-Ultimate Spam killer
  203. Raystlyn 04:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Spamreporter1 12:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Just glad to be here[reply]
  205. Dirk Beetstra T C 19:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC) - Time to sign up.[reply]
  206. Slowreactor- Spam absolutely drives me nuts!
  207. Marcusmax
  208. PMJ
  209. Vynbos 22:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Personally I would like no external links outside of the "External Links" header. I'll flag any suspect external links.[reply]
  210. Of course. Thomas Larsen 02:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Requestion 21:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Give a hoot don't pollute.[reply]
  212. Steve355 14:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  213. Belovedfreak
  214. Exarion
  215. Shanlung 11:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Spartaz
  217. ionamanley
  218. UnitedStatesian 18:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Focus on linkspam particularly[reply]
  219. ISubmit78614:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Patrick Berry 19:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Jtg920 17:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  222. Cocoma 07:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Wiley 03:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  224. pIrish 20:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Versageek 02:44, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  226. Leuko 08:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  227. Nol888 02:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  228. Rehnn83 10:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Count me in - most of my edits seem to be removing links of this sort.[reply]
  229. Junglecat 02:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Kimon (talk · contribs)
  231. Deletion Quality-Sure, why not?
  232. Thebestkiano 09:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Panfakes 02:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Cream147 Shout at me for doing wrong 06:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC) I just started taking it out spam, it's good fun (although it would be better if it weren't there...)[reply]
  235. With great Pleasure Alessandro57 Alex2006 09:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  236. Zantaggerung 14:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC) I want to help with this problem,but I doubt I will be very capable of it.[reply]
  237. Zidel333 14:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC) With pleasure[reply]
  238. Cla68 00:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Happy to join the team.[reply]
  239. DaniDarling 16:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC) I registered with Wikipedia just so that I could try and help fight SPAM. Wiki is what the internet is all about. Let's keep it all good![reply]
  240. Ronz 16:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Nice to join a group who can teach me the finer points of battling spam.[reply]
  241. Schanker21 14:57, 13 April 2007 Hi
  242. YKgm 16:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC) I'll definitely keep a few eyes out for it...[reply]
  243. Jet123 (Talk) 21:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  244. User: Kid Evil 1
  245. Obology 16:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC) "Their Nemesis"[reply]
  246. Anna512 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  247. Mewslee37 (talk • contribs) 7:58, 30 April 2007 (Hates spam like Zoolander hated Hansel)
  248. The Hippie 22:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  249. Bearian
  250. Jrod2 Good nose for smelling spam. Became a spam buster by accident. It chose me, I didn't choose it.
  251. Evan I used to be an anon spam-deleter. Now I've signed up because I want to contribute.
  252. Leon Sword – I've been an unofficial member for a long time, might as well make it official. Death to spam links!
  253. PhishRCool 23:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  254. Skittlesrgood4u 00:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Larkdragon98 I just started my account. I want to specialize in spam!
  256. Spamslayer2000 May 17, 2007 (UTC)I've joined since I am sick and tired of pages becoming link repositories!
  257. Anas talk? Longtime spam fighter. Just found out about this, though. 13:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  258. katieh5584
  259. UBeR 01:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  260. nadav (talk) 15:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  261. 76.185.197.228 08:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  262. Bradybd 01:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Spam spam go away...[reply]
  263. Raymondlu84
  264. SilkTork It can be an awkward and unpleasant struggle removing spam. Good to come upon a team that will provide support and advise.
  265. Coren 23:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC) I mostly do new page patrol; but I oftentimes assist in reverting spammers back throughout their history.[reply]
  266. DGG 14:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC) My particular concern is that potentially good articles not get deleted using the excuse of spam, but get cleaned instead.[reply]
  267. Vreemdst 09:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC) Proud to help. At my own pace ...[reply]
  268. Saber12 I shall watch. And I shall clean! <3
  269. Snowfreak91287 I'll fix it if I come across it.
  270. Vincent Lextrait
  271. Ancientcoinsofindia1
  272. Baroques
  273. 71.154.1.186 22:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  274. Michael estelle 05:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  275. ThirdEchelon 07:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC) I'm in. Unfortunately I'm in high school, so I won't be able to constantly contribute - but I will help however I can.[reply]
  276. AngelOfSadness talk Count me in aswell. I'm sick of the amount of spam on wikipedia and I'm glad I can be apart of a group that helps with this problem.
  277. Pacula (talk)(contribs) There is no sweeter song than the refrain of a spammer running off for greener pastures...
  278. CyberGhostface I'll be glad to help when I can.
  279. Jw21/PenaltyKillah(discuss•edits): That's strange, I thought I already signed up. Anyway, I have been removing spam links and such, and I would like to contribute to the removal of spam, and how it can be controlled. I will also promote this project and ask others to join it. We have enough spam in e-mails and YouTube, so let's roast them to extreme deliciousness!
  280. Phgao 06:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  281. Shokwaav 12:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC): SPAM MUST BE DELETED! I'm sick of spam on wikipedia, I need to take hours and hours just to get rid of the onflow of SPAM! Get rid of SPAM NOW! SPAM SPAM SPAM[reply]
  282. Sander Säde 18:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC) More and more spam every day. Perhaps it is time to take some drastic MediaWiki-level measures against it?[reply]
  283. bigdawgs9 00:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  284. d4rkljcv73 13:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC) Let's make Wikipedia fun and spam free.[reply]
  285. Life 09:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  286. spareus151Die spam , die!
  287. MarkMarek 15:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC) My contribution check will reveal that I've been countering spam for a while on wiki. It was only a question of time before I'd join an Anti-Spam project.[reply]
  288. MorrisRob 07:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  289. 842U
  290. wooerfara3661
  291. Pumpmeup
  292. AVSB 11:25, 19 November 2007 - I can help fight spam because I use Wikipedia everyday.
  293. skopp   Skopp   08:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  294. {}~Ellie~{} (talk) 03:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  295. Anshuk (talk) 03:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  296. 12 Noon 15:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC) I check newbies and IPs whose edit summaries are for "External links"; I remove new spam postings, but if there might be other spam I will tag the article for review, but I hate looking through old spam :)[reply]
  297. PookeyMaster PookeyMaster (talk) 23:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  298. Dbdb (talk) 01:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC) I am concerned that blacklisting is being abused to censor sites. At the least there should be clear reasons shown when a site is blacklisted.[reply]
  299. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 21:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC) I delete many spam articles through performing WP:NPP.[reply]
  300. Glandmaster (talk)
  301. Pinkadelica (talk) 20:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC) Count me in! I'm tired of people adding links that promote their fansite only to find they put it back a few days later.[reply]
  302. TheBilly (talk) 20:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC) - I already fight spam regularly, so I might as well join the formal effort[reply]
  303. RichardΩ612 11:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC) - Egg sausage egg and Wikipedia spam? Well no more![reply]
  304. Alloranleon
  305. Wjhonson (talk) 23:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC) for removal of inappropriate linking, and refining the meaning of Spam.[reply]
  306. Igor Berger (talk) 00:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Doing my best![reply]
  307. Mifter (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  308. Randomtime (talk) 15:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC) /join[reply]
  309. Stealthound (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  310. Wizardman 16:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  311. Staffwaterboy Talk♂ 17:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  312. KaylaraOwl (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  313. Mr Accountable and zh:User:Mr Accountable 20 Apr 2008
  314. Caomhin 19:30 23 April 2008 (UTC)
  315. Eoag (talk) 14:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  316. User:BigBrother1997 (talk) 8:00, 7 May 2008 (EST) Spam really p****** me off!
  317. Anon126
  318. What can I say? I love clearing out CAT:SPAM. --jonny-mt 01:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  319. Jolenine
  320. Crashwalker
  321. Nebrot
  322. ukexpat, Out, out damned spam... My spam comes out of a tin, preferably with chips, egg and spam. – ukexpat (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  323. SpencerT♦C I'll add myself. I clean out external links sections frequently.
  324. ShootinPutin109 (talk) 09:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  325. Themfromspace (talk) 10:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Death to the ads![reply]
  326. Ekologkonsult (talk) 19:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  327. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  328. Alexf42 13:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  329. Terra 20:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  330. Itfc+canes=me (talk) 16:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC) I have got my shotgun ready for shooting spammers XD.[reply]
  331. Jeff.j -cannot stand spam let me know if their is anything you want me to clean up
  332. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) - Been fighting spam for a while, but just decided to join here.
  333. This is a good idea. I'll be on the lookout --Cmputer 18:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
  334. Let me at 'em. Paxse (talk)
  335. Creez34 (talk) 03:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC) I got banned for vandalism, but earned an unblock, I have learned my lesson, and wish to fight people who have abused wikipedia policies.[reply]
  336. I'm mad as hell, and I can't take spam anymore! Rubensni (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  337. Excellent idea. I'll help out as much as possible. --Citrus Lemonade (talk) 01:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  338. Can't believe I didn't join until now... ColdmachineTalk 14:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  339. --Kanonkas :  Talk  16:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  340. --Sleepyhead (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  341. Ks64q2 (talk) I'm on the case. Ks64q2 (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  342. videl8 00:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC) Proud to be in the fighting brigade!.[reply]
  343. Glenn L (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Thanks for letting me join.[reply]
  344. Unionhawk Talk E-mail 12:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Spam=Bad. Must kill![reply]
  345. Alxeedo TALK So what if I can only undo. Look at my contribs!
  346. Triplestop x3 22:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  347. Iohannes Animosus (talk) 18:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  348. Wackogamer123 (talk) 14:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC) I eat spam for breakfast![reply]
  349. Estrelly 05:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  350. 4wajzkd02 (talk) 20:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  351. Hello! Goodbye! Gnowxilef (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  352. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  353. J. M. (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  354. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 09:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  355. sillybillypiggy
  356. Guven
  357. Vtsuperboi
  358. Marquis de Montcalm (Talk) 16:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  359. Enti342 MEMO 04:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  360. 132 00:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  361. The Interior
  362. Elizium23
  363. Jacob12190 19:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC) i eat spam all day
  364. Osarius. Spam, the online equivalent to junk mail.
  365. ƻβ
  366. User:Wingdude88 Count me in! How did I not hear about this before?--The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  367. Marek69
  368. SenatorSteve (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC) Spam sucks! Get rid of it![reply]
  369. 4Jmaster 15:33, 24 May 2011 (EST) Spam is unforgivable! Help stop it.
  370. Kilmer-san (talk) 03:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  371. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  372. OmnipotentArchetype0309 - Spam is nonsense. Spam is meat. We eat spam for breakfast.
  373. MuhdNurHidayat - Please don't spam, I'm very angry with spammers!--MuhdNurHidayat (talk) 13:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  374. Vrenator 15 December 2011 (UTC)
  375. User:Samsujata - Iregularly check the pages on my watchlist to identify SPAM(mers), and revert their edits.
  376. Bonsoir33
  377. Manueloguarcia - Stop Spam now
  378. Scopecreep
  379. Trijnsteltalk 12:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  380. User:Thegreatgrabber A good idea. I'll try to help when I can.
  381. gtajaxoxo - Stop spam and other unwanted advertising!
  382. User:Jay Starz
  383. Torreslfchero (talk) 20:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  384. User:Aktabo - Whenever I see improper advertising or SPAM I will revert their edits. I browse mainly in English, Chinese, Japanese and Korean version.
  385. User:xtraelv
  386. User:CHCSPrefect "Yuck, I hate spam". Spam and Vandalism are my pet hates and anyone doing either is straight on my hate list. If you need a motivator against this from of disreputable vermin i'm your man for the job!
  387. Jakebarrington Let's win this battle!
  388. Sue Rangell
  389. Om.Tem I'd like to give articles anti-spam medications!!!
  390. User:Deb - it's getting worse!
  391. User:JustBerry I am committed to preventing spam. Let's do this! --JustBerry (talk) 01:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  392. Glaisher
  393. --Time for a nice cuppa brew (talk) 17:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC) SPAM IS NOT COOL[reply]
  394. Doc_Sheldon I hate spam, in all its forms!
  395. DeviantSerpent
  396. Jaydubya93 (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC) In hoc signo vinces Spammus[reply]
  397. Frenzie23(talk)
  398. Mr. Yondris Ferguson (Leave a Comment)
  399. ///EuroCarGT
  400. --Allen talk 23:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC) I prefer to take out spam![reply]
  401. Septinlas (talk) 09:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  402. I am a meta sysop, which means I can help blacklisting anyspamlink on any WMF wikis. (as long as they are xwiki) — Revi 14:10, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  403. --Gaff (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  404. Mysterious Gopher "Spam go bye-bye."
  405. Racy Rodriguez
  406. Miraclexix (talk · contribs · count)
  407. Federalist51
  408. Ashenai (talk)
  409. Alekstollasepp I eat pieces of spam for breakfast..
  410. user:Helmut von Moltke I am committed to maintaining the encyclopedic integrity of Wikipedia.
  411. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 03:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  412. User:Rlin8 Sure, why not?
  413. CopernicusAD (u) (t) :) Yes!!!!!!
  414. Barakokula31 19:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  415. justaZBguy Happy to get involved fighting spam! 12:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  416. StarlightStratosphere Killjoys, make some noise! 1258, January 16th, 2018
  417. User:TaxAct2018 10:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  418. REALMMB📮 15:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC) About time I participated in this fight against all the scam existing here.[reply]
  419. Vermont | reply here 11:09, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  420. Samee
  421. GermanJoe
  422. AfroThundr3007730
  423. Newslinger talk 12:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  424. funplussmart (talk) I do a lot of anti-spam work already.
  425. Shellwood (talk) 02:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  426. gbrading (ταlκ) 13:57, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  427. NirvanaTodayt@lk 02:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC) I'm like the spam eating gorilla. I do daily work on spam fighting.[reply]
  428. Meszzy2 (talk) 18:20, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  429. creffett (talk) 16:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  430. Mjs1991, Vandals for breakfast, spam for dinner. Nom Nom Nom
  431. SacredDragonX (talk) 23:09, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  432. Seanwong (talk) 23:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  433. SamHolt6 (talk) 22:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  434. Sagotreespirit (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  435. The Awesome Guy in the world (talk) 20:37, 3 November 2019 (BST)
  436. Magisch talk to me 14:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  437. Abdullah Al Manjur (talk · contribs) 16:35:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]
  438.  ArchonBoi—(Talk) 04:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  439. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 19:25, 21 April 2020 (UTC) I find myself dealing with spam a lot these days, so might as well.[reply]
  440. The4lines (talk · contribs) Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 02:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  441. User:prahlad balaji 1/4 of my time is spent fighting spammers.
  442. Netherzone (talk) 21:06, 1 July 2020 (UTC) - spam drives me bonkers.[reply]
  443. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 07:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  444. Infogapp1 (talk • contribs) — Infogapp1 (talk) 16:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  445. IRoyalYadav (talk) I do a lot of anti-spam work already. I'm in.
  446. 1292simon (talk) 04:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  447. SHISHIR DUA (talk) *** WIKIPEDIA SPAMMERS, BANNED for vandalizing and attempting to destroy Wikipedia. *** 08:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  448. Flori4nK (talk) 12:15, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  449. Celestina007 (talk) 18:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC) / I’m an active anti spam editor very much experienced in nabbing Spam/UPE pertaining to African articles. If you have come across an article on an African and aren’t sure if or not it is Spam/UPE you are very much welcome to leave a message on my talk page to ask for an opinion.[reply]
  450. ---Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 12:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  451. AMitzikarlA•Let's talk• 9:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
  452. User:ilikememes128 Ilikememes128 (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  453. Pahunkat (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  454. Skingo12 (talk) 12:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  455. Catcher (talk)
  456. Dheeraj Budhori(Researcher) (talk)
  457. Sennecaster (What now?) 02:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  458. Giannide1 (talk) I do mainly anti-spam work in the Italian Wiki, but ready to join and work on the English version as well! 10:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  459. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 05:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC) I deal with cross-wiki spam.[reply]
  460. echidnaLives - talk - edits
  461. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits)
  462. Knowpanther (talk) 15:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  463. The Corvette ZR1 (talk) - Always got the car keys to run over spammers.
  464. — Prodraxis {talk • contributions} (she/her) 01:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC) Mostly working with tagging G11 edits in main, user or draftspace for speedy deletion.[reply]
  465. Codename Noreste 🤔 𝙇𝙖 𝙎𝙪𝙢𝙖 19:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  466. Wikishovel (talk) 13:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  467. Flux55 (talk)
  468. Usimite (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  469. MetropolitanIC (💬|📝) 10:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Spam tastes pretty good, but I'd prefer it not to be on my Wikipedia articles.[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/Participants&oldid=1232828487"