Steward requests/Checkuser/2016-09

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in September 2016, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Latest comment: 8 years ago46 comments18 people in discussion

Valimali67@ro.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Valimali67 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 103.3.62.20 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example

Reason(s): Blocked user, apparently uses the anon IP to circumvent a block. Based on the duck test, was blocked, but challenges the block. I could use a checkuser confirmation. Andrei Stroe (talk) 15:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Not done We do not associate users with specific IP addresses. Ruslik (talk) 17:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Mpb eu@bg.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Mpb eu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Eu mpb (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Mpb Sf (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Simeon denkov (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Avantir (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Scalana (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Mpb eu is a known sockpuppet offender,[1][2][3] currently blocked for harassment. Eu mpb and Mpb Sf were obvious socks (blocked already), but Simeon denkov isn't. However, it feverishly tries to vote on a deletion discussion in favour of Mpb eu, using virtually the same arguments (including personal attacks) and even making spelling mistakes consistent with those typical of Mpb eu, which makes the account highly suspect of a yet another sock. Because of the autoblocks and the blocking of a network used by Mpb eu, I suppose the edits may come from anonymous proxies (a couple with anonymous edits have already been blocked). — Luchesar • T/C 14:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

+ Avantir: same as for Simeon denkov. — Luchesar • T/C 14:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Adding one more to this case as the above: Scalana.--The Wiki Boy (talk) 19:34, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Avantir is

Confirmed as a sock of Simeon denkov. Other accounts are also

Likely - the user edits through many proxies. Ruslik (talk) 12:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Ruslik. This is really helpful! — Luchesar • T/C 12:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Ruslik, sorry to bother you again, but another likely sock popped up today, with the same personal attacks, etc.:

Sieminehn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Could you check it as well, please? — Luchesar • T/C 16:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Here's one more, which is active only on the English Wikipedia. It was used to circumvent the protection here by recreating the deleted page under a different name. I already notified a sysop/CU there, but since this is already a case of cross-wiki abuse, I thought it's good to mention it here as well.

Mpb bg (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Cheers,
— Luchesar • T/C 22:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I am not sure about Sieminehn. Ruslik (talk) 18:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Ruslik, it might be a meatpuppet indeed. Could you please just tell whether the edits were from a (likely) open proxy or not? — Luchesar • T/C 18:28, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Another one which looks more like a sock than a meatpuppet. Apologies for constantly bugging you with these cases. I'll see to have the proposal for local CUs finalized in the next days (most of the work is already done), so hopefully this will be the last case from us.

LugerP08 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

— Luchesar • T/C 16:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

LugerP08 is

Unlikely. Mpb_bg does not seem to edit through proxies (the IP locates to Sofia). Ruslik (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks again, Ruslik. Really appreciate your help. — Luchesar • T/C 18:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

AzorAhai@fa.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: AzorAhai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); مهرنگار (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: this tools

Reason(s): User Mehrnegar "مهرنگار" made this page and nominated user:AzorAhai for Bureaucrat permission in fa@wiki and inserted her vote. But they have lots of semi edit in fa wiki and we think they are same

Mehrnegar(مهرنگار) registered on January 21, 2015. Today's 1 year 2 months 16 days of Wikipedia

Special access for Mehrnegar "مهرنگار" on December 2, 2015. The 9 months 4 days

On February 27, 2016. Azor Ahai and failed to request admin (for Mehrnegar 6 months, 10 days )

Mehrnegar "مهرنگار" personally admin on August 4, 2016 will be

Azor Ahai the admin has successfully مهرنگار (On August 18, 2016)

Mehrnegar "مهرنگار" administrator has 19 days

--Iranian Shah^{ـــ☫ـــ}(talk) 03:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

This user check request has been rejected once early in Meta and in PersianWikipedia about 20 minutes ago. MohammadtheEditor (talk) 07:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

When we have local (active) CUs, stewards can't do checkuser. This request is automatically rejected. Amir (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Rejected Farsi Wikipedia has local CheckUsers (cf. CheckUser_policy#Access_to_CheckUser). You should fill the request here. Thank you. —Marco Aurelio 08:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio:hello
Is this a prank? They played the game to take control of the Persian Wikipedia
Cut! off my access: why? Because I said something.
All killed!
--Iranian Shah^{ـــ☫ـــ}(talk) 09:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

hey, (All killed) ??? , Wikipedia:No legal threats --AFlorence (talk) 10:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

what? --Iranian Shah^{ـــ☫ـــ}(talk) 10:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

This request is Not done since local Checkusers exists. For other issues see Steward requests/Miscellaneous. -- Tegel _(Talk) 13:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

One other option is a RFC. -- Tegel _(Talk) 13:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

@Tegel:What do you know? They block a lot of users. See my account: I do not have access to @fa.wikipedia!--Iranian Shah^{ـــ☫ـــ}(talk) 13:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Please don't change the status. That you don't have access to the local wiki doesn't change the fact that there is local Checkusers and it's these people that should do the check and not Steward. You still have access to Steward requests/Miscellaneous and RFC since these pages is here at Meta. If you continue to remove the status on this case here you might loose the possibility to edit Meta, so don't do that again. -- Tegel _(Talk) 14:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

oops!... Third admin Where?--Iranian Shah^{ـــ☫ـــ}(talk) 14:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Imasansu@global

Status: Done

List of users: Imasansu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Cigkatsto (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Daidozbil (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Kondulpap (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Maslulje (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Pafrapanjo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Patririsr (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Zadanpos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Cupizsredve (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jedkonkom (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Recent accounts, spamming across different wikis with the same blogspot site. There may be more socks. Do a check for these accounts and a global rollback for their edits, and global lock/block of accounts. Usuário utente (talk) 08:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

New sock: Jebstarad (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser).

Locked. Ruslik (talk) 18:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Probably is necessary to block his IP. --Usuário utente (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

To identify new socks, check periodically log of new userpages created here on meta - seems that creating a userpage here - is a common behaviour for this farm of clones. --Usuário utente (talk) 14:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Ρητά_και_παροιμίες@el.eikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Ρητά και παροιμίες (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Δαμάλι (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example

Reason(s): Νικόλας Παπαποστόλου has been indefinetely blocked from all projects. User Δαμάλι has been confirmed to be a sock puppet. User Ρητά και παροιμίες shows also similar pattern (inability to speak correctly english, see Requests for new languages/Wikispecies Greek, where he also speaks about the "supremacy" of the greek language - it isn't the first time that he shows his nationalism). Also, his first edits at greek wikiquote are not what you expect from a newbie (templates). The edits he made in wikipedias so a similar thematology and lack of understandment of how wikipedia works. C messier (talk) 11:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Done, you are right. Now locked. --Stryn (talk) 12:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Vollatyll@ro.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Vollatyll (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Liniste16 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Aliuorgio (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Certeffy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: [4]

Reason(s): Edit pattern raises the strong suspicion that Volatyll may be a recent sockpuppet of w:ro:Utilizator:BAICAN XXX, permanently banned project-wide, who maintains a very prolific clone farm. The other names are confirmed sockpuppets, to assist the search. If confirmed, would you suggest a range block? -- Victor Blacus (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

I strongly support the above request. Please add the account Rotattif (new entry) to the list of suspected sockpuppets. --Pafsanias (talk) 07:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Aliuorgio and Certeffy are

Stale. Vollatyll and Liniste16 are

Confirmed as well as Verticalla and Rotattif. Ruslik (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Νεοκλής και Νικοκλής@el.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Νεοκλής και Νικοκλής (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ρητά και παροιμίες (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Η Θάνου της Βικιπαίδειας (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Kokinnos maxitis (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Νταρντάνα (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Local policy link

Reason(s): User Νεοκλής και Νικοκλής is clearly not a new user, learning immediately how to go to recent changes and change speedy deletion requests and templates and shows a tendency to edit mass media and politics related articles. It is strongly suspected to be a sock puppet of a blocked user. C messier (talk) 16:46, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Done. user: Η Θάνου της Βικιπαίδειας is

Likely. I can see that user:Νεοκλής και Νικοκλής is, according to CU data, the same user as blocked: Ο ΣΕ ΘΕΛΩ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΕΛΙΟΣ, + Α Γ Υ Ρ Τ Η Σ +, Νικόλας Παπετοστόλου. There are also two more accounts, not blocked, but not used since August: Στέλιος Θ. and Βενιαμίν Ζερβάκης. Please compare their edit pattern, etc. I cannot see connection between the rest of accounts you listed. einsbor _talk 23:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Darcolit@ro.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Darcolit (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Vollatyll (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Verticalla (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Rotattif (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: [5]

Reason(s): Edit pattern raises the strong suspicion that Darcolit may be a recent sockpuppet of w:ro:Utilizator:BAICAN XXX, banned project-wide, who maintains a very prolific clone farm. The other names are recent sockpuppets, confirmed and blocked three days ago; they are mentioned here to assist in the search. If confirmed, I would like to block the range 2003:68:ec00::/40; this has been done twice before and it helped. Would that be appropriate? This guy is giving us a lot of trouble. -- Victor Blacus (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed. You can also block that range as there are no other users on it. Ruslik (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Derakhshan@fa.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Derakhshan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); آتروپات (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); بهمنیار (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): see(old)!: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser/2015-12#Derakhshan52.40fa.wikipedia

Blocks is necessary (for en.wikipedia and fa.wikipedia)...Thank you :)--Iran9 (talk) 06:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Comment first: User:Derakhshan has already announced that آتروپات & بهمنیار are both his alternative accounts. second: We have a local CU in FaWiki and third: User:Iran9 has been blocked indef for Sock puppetry (See the list of his socks).--Arian ^Talk 20:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Rejected —Marco Aurelio 10:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

@Ruslik0:.@MarcoAurelio:*see......74.70.146.1&Derakhshan is Sock puppetry and: bahmanyar(بهمنیار) is block. to farsi wikipedia
Iranian admins do not know the other accounts (Derakhshan)
He(Derakhshan) is friends inspector ( local CU!)--Iran9 (talk) 10:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

We won't undertake this request. FA and EN has local CUs. Please don't change the status of this request. —Marco Aurelio 10:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

no problem.@Mardetanha: (Steward persian) come here fa: با اطیمنان می‌گویم درخشان 80تا زاپاس دارد. مردتنها اگر مردی به اینجا می‌آیی و درخواست بازرسی می‌دهی هرچند ان قدر رفتار منفعل بودن در مقابل خودی ‌ها و غیرخودی‌ها را دیدم که به شما هم شک دارم. سپاس--Iran9 (talk) 11:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)