Stewards/confirm/2010/Effeietsanders

English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.

العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.

Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.

Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.

فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.

Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.

Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.

Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.

Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.

עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.

Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.

Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.

日本語： 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。

Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.

Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.

Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.

Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.

Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.

中文： 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。

中文（简体）： 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。

中文（繁體）: 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。

Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.

Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.

Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.

Effeietsanders

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1
Personal info: In the past while, I have not been very active, although I do think I have maintained a level of sufficient activity to be useful. I do admit however that sometimes as a result of this lower activity I do not know all ins and outs of policy and technical ways, so I need to look up more than in the past.
I realize I have been a pain in the ass sometimes to other stewards when being persistant on how the rules were intended, what the agreements / conditions were when software changes were made and rights added etc, and some might consider that unproductive. I consider it guarding the principles.
I would not mind a lot if my stewardship would not be confirmed, it is not something I aspire hugely, if people think I am not active enough to know the ins and outs of the technical side.

日本語:

言語: nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1
候補者の情報: これまで、あまり多く活動できていませんが、ある程度はお役に立てたと思える程度の活動量は維持できたかと思います。しかしながら、活動が少なかったために、方針や機能の増減を全ては把握できていないと思いますので、もっとよく調べる必要を感じています。
私は他のスチュワードの方々にとって厄介者であったと感じています。各種ルールが何を意図しているのか、ソフトウェアの変更や権限の新設の際に合意や状況がどうであったか、等々について頑迷であったりして、非生産的と感じる方もいらっしゃったかと思います。私はこのことを、守るべき原則を守ることだと思っています。
私は何が何でもご信任を頂きたいとは思っていません。あまり活動しておらず機能面の増減を把握できていない、と皆さまがお考えなら、スチュワードの立場にしがみつくものではありません。

русский:

Языки: nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1
Личная информация: В последнее время, я не очень активен, хотя я думаю, что поддерживал уровень достаточной активности, для того, чтобы быть полезным. Я признаться, однако, в результате снижения активности не знаю все тонкости правил и технические средства, так что мне нужно искать больше, чем в прошлом.
Я понимаю, что я был некоторое время головной болью для других стюардов, когда я был стойким в том, какими должны быть правила, какие соглашения / условия должны быть внесены в программное обеспечение, права добавлены и т. д., и некоторые могли считать, что это было непродуктивным. Я считаю, что это охраняло принципы.
Я не возражал бы, если моё стюардство не будет подтверждено, это не то, к чему я сильно стремлюсь, если люди считают, что я недостаточно активен, чтобы знать все аспекты технической стороны.

Comments about Effeietsanders

Has to be confirmed, too. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
confirm. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
may not be the most active but Effie is often our conscience (or naysayer, if you like) on the mailing list. I think not having him around to benefit from his views and insight would be a loss. Reconfirm. ++Lar: t/c 01:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I count at least nine (depending on how you count them) rights actions, more if you also count cross-project actions such as oversights and checkusers, and a handful of adminless-project deletions. Keep per minimum activity requirements. Kylu 02:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not very active; but sufficient activity for me. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Has very limited activity two actions in last couple of months, perhaps could focus on policy making better as his outspoken views sometimes hamper work that needs to be done. MoiraMoira 07:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though I hope to see him more active again. Davin 08:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WizardOfOz ^talk 10:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As I see him often around on IRC, I think he's available enough. Reconfirm. -Barras ^talk 12:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
confirm --Church of emacs talk 12:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
yes! ;)--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 12:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm − Elfix × talk (fr) 13:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm. I agree with Lar. --Erwin 13:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm. Active enough. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 14:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Marcus Cyron 17:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
indeed the best guardian of the principles , definitely confirm --Mardetanha ^talk 17:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--Jusjih 04:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep, but get more active (and less bureaucratic :P) --FiliP ██ 11:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
One of these two requests is impossible to achieve; I won't say which one :D guillom 05:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, considering the above statement the second request wont make it :) And considering the time Wikimedia is already eating up right now, I doubt the first as well. Effeietsanders 11:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Razor flame 07:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do not support - Waerth 16:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC) - The most ultra bureaucrat you can meet. Only sees rules and doesn't show any compassion. Stabs you in the back to if it fits him.[reply]
Keep --Jyothis 16:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - DustSpinner 22:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
reconfirm bastique ^demandez! 23:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep without a shadow of a doubt oscar 00:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - ※ JéRRy ┼ 雨雨 ※ 16:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm, and thanks for serving. Finn Rindahl 00:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
available and proficient. Keep billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats on your nomination for the most ultra hyper Wikimedia bureaucrat of 2009. So Keep. Although I'm convinced no one could beet me in this field. --Aphaia 01:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent steward. Durova 19:47, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I specially liked this recent non bureaucratic action [1] - Taketa 20:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Eats, breaths and lives Wikimedia. Fontes 23:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Highly involved Wikimedian. --Millosh 13:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm. Annabel 07:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Anthere 00:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FollowTheMedia 00:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Although I don't see enough steward activities for the last year, I hope he does well with the second term.--Caspian blue 16:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course, one of the few persons with a noticeable sense of (data) privacy protection --:bdk: 22:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Raymond 15:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove rights. (POV pushing, infringement Stewards policy#Don't decide Steward_requests/Permissions/2010-02#SergeyJ.40ru.wikiversity) SergeyJ 22:01, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
lolwhut? NonvocalScream 01:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand SergeyJ 01:25, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Возможно Вы желаете более развернутого пояснения. Заранее извиняюсь за размер. Моя заявка на бюрократа была отклонена. Не подумайте что меня это сильно расстроило :) Нет, я просто считаю что была нарушена процедура принятия решения. Несколько стюардов решали это на основании личного мнения. (Кто-то более корректно, кто то в приказном порядке.) Хотя это прямо запрещено правилом Stewards policy#Don't decide. Было объявлено, что есть некое мнение о минимальном числе голосов в этом случае. Не смотря на то, что месяц обратно на это совершенно не обращали внимания. При акционировании на этом внимании произошло обсуждение Talk:Bureaucrat#Minimum_number_of_votes. Но результата никакого не последовало. Никаких новых ограничений не было выдвинуто. Поэтому я считаю, что тут действовали не согласно правилам, а согласно личному мнению, наверное обо мне, в чем и проявляется (POV pushing), правда не одного, а нескольких стюардов. Я лишь по прежнему настаиваю, что данное требование о минимальном числе голосов - должно быть официально записано. Хотя лично я не считаю это необходимым, но нужно это спросить у сообщества, а не только у стюардов - и только тогда такие решения, которые были приняты в моем частном случае, могут быть легитимный. Без этого были нарушения о которых я говорю. SergeyJ 01:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autotransfer. Probably you wish more developed explanatory. In advance I apologise for a size. My demand for the bureaucrat has been rejected. Do not think that it has strongly upset me :) Is not present, I simply consider that decision-making procedure has been broken. Some stewards solved it on the basis of personal opinion. (Someone it is more correct, who that in the form of an order.) Though it is directly forbidden by a rule Stewards policy#Don't decide. It has been declared that there is a certain opinion on the minimum poll in this case. Despite that back at all did not pay month attention to it. At the strengthened reference on it of attention on this attention there was a discussion Talk:Bureaucrat#Minimum_number_of_votes. But result any has not followed. Any new restrictions it has not been put forward. Therefore I consider that here operated not according to rules, and according to personal opinion, probably about me in what it is shown (POV pushing), the truth not one, and several stewards. I only on the former insist that the given requirement about the minimum poll - should be written officially down. Though personally I do not consider it necessary, but it is necessary to ask it community, and not just at stewards - and only then such decisions which have been accepted in my special case, can be legitimate. Without it there were infringements about which I speak. SergeyJ 01:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm Thank you for continued service. NonvocalScream 01:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Remove rights. I confirm the words of SergeyJ. Bolo1910 08:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm, per Lar. LeinaD (t) 17:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Lolsimon 00:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Roger Davies ^talk 15:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I felt comfortable this year with every single member of the team. This is true, regardless of the mere count of actions and the amount of interactions on wiki, mailing list, IRC, social networks or real life. Therefore I'd feel much more comfy if all current stewards are confirmed. --M/ 23:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Djordjes (talk) 23:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]