Jump to content

Talk:Tech

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Elitre (WMF) in topic Your feedback is welcome!

Organizing discussion spaces on Meta

[edit]

Wouldn't this page be more comprehensible as a subpage of Wikimedia Forum? Nemo 08:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Maybe. The name "Wikimedia Forum" is kind of terrible, though. Does Wikimedia Forum already have subpages for other subjects? --MZMcBride 16:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've started a discussion at Meta:Babel#Organizing discussion spaces on meta. guillom 14:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Archive

[edit]

It's probably time to archive some of the content; what's a good rule of thumb to determine how much to archive? guillom 11:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

It looks like MarcoAurelio set up auto-archiving, per SAS. --MZMcBride (talk) 17:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Crap

[edit]

Why is this page getting more crap posted to it than in the past? Is it just the navigational banner that links to it?` Killiondude (talk) 21:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Killiondude. Nice to see you around. It seems that this page is no longer mantained? Best regards. —MarcoAurelio 18:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Any interest in killing this page?

[edit]

Or moving it, or pointing people to better locations, etc.? --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback is welcome!

[edit]

Hey everyone, TL;DR, see Technical Collaboration/Community collaboration in product development/Tech ambassadors and translators Community Relations/Community collaboration in product development/Tech ambassadors and translators to provide feedback on the role of tech ambassadors and tech translators until August 22nd, or in person at Wikimania. All details on page. Any help spreading the word is certainly appreciated :) Ciao, --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Elitre (WMF) Did you mean Community Relations/Community collaboration in product development/Tech ambassadors and translators as the link you provided is red and has been deleted a few times. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 07:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
PDL, I guess so. Note that that project is no longer active (these days, it'd probably belong to a different team). Thanks, --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 08:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tech/Serverumstellung 2018

[edit]

From a banner at the German Wikipedia, there was a link to this. Habitator terrae (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

help

[edit]

Hello
my dear friends how can I fix Syntax error on Json in this template [[چوٙأ:Country data kyrgyzstan]lrc lori (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)] in lrc.wikipedia.org?Reply
best wishes. lrc lori (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Layout problem in bracket codes

[edit]

There are lots of errors in how 32 team bracket are displayed. I checked few cases from 24, 48 and 64 brackets and they were correct, so it seems to be only 32 team problem:

  • Template:32TeamBracket-2legs, Template:32TeamBracket-2legs-except final, Template:32TeamBracket-Compact-Squash5, Template:32TeamBracket-Tennis3 and Template:32TeamBracket-Tennis5 are missing spacer rows at "Round of 32", which Template:32TeamBracket has. Broken ones have all pairs mushed together, so it's visually horrible mess.
  • Template:5RoundBracket-Byes, Template:32TeamBracket-Byes and Template:32TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis5 are missing "Round of 32" boxes completely
  • Template:5RoundBracket is missing round header texts and padding
  • Template:32TeamBracket-Compact-info shows content tags or something
  • Template:32TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes shows only final
  • Template:32TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis3 is missing both spacer rows and padding from round headers