Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Social news

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Social news

Social news (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:907E:A450:170:1FFF:87A2:6269 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is complex and copied from ChatGPT 2601:644:907E:A450:170:1FFF:87A2:6269 (talk) 20:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: I am inclined to just nuke it unless someone wants to fix it immediately. JustarandomamericanALT (talk) 20:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. --ginaan(T/C) 11:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unreferenced chat GP is not helpful. Not convinced the topic merits an article. Rathfelder (talk) 14:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We need to be WP:SIMPLE here, and ChatGPT ain't it chief.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 18:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Quick Delete en:WP:TNT. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Quick Delete Unsourced, AI generated content does not make a viable article. Ravensfire (talk) 12:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ravensfire: Being unsourced is not a QD criterion. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It reminds me of w:Social news website Thanks and edit well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 10:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the editor's comments above, delete this mess. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A shame so many people felt the need to add what is basically just a delete vote but no-one decided to fix it. A redirect and a little bit of content in Social network service would be better than nothing at least, and no-one appears to have considered that. --Ferien2 (talk) 12:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - In my honest opinion having read the article and Feriens comment above there is nothing in that waffle that can be saved and even if it could I would assume it's all copyrighted anyway?, Better off being deleted and any editor in good standing can either recreate it or add relevent information to the social network article. –Davey2010^Talk 17:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 20:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.