User talk:HCShannon
Welcome to Wikidata, HCShannon!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Best regards! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
P1080 and P1441
[edit]Please, do not add P:1080 with works like in this. from narrative universe (P1080) should be used with fictional universes (see the constraints and the talk page). It's present in work (P1441) that should be used for indicate in which work the item appears. I corrected it but I would appreciate if you are more careful next time. Both P1080 and P1441 have 0 constraints violations in value now and I hope it can remain so. Many thanks! --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- PLEASE take care, you are still using P1080 when it should be P1441. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 11:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
P1263 added to incorrect item
[edit]Hello, please see this edit. The code was added to Boulting brothers (Q3181105) instead of Roy Boulting (Q212466). — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 21:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add UNII (P652) to items with instance of (P31)=taxon (Q16521). --Succu (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Stop it! Thanks. --Succu (talk) 07:10, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Twins
[edit]Hi HCShannon,
You might want to have a look at WikiProject Identical Twins. What do you think of it? --- Jura 16:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Mix 'n' match
[edit]Sorry to burst in, but I have to say it: you have to pay more attention when you establish a link between an external catalogue and a Wikidata item. I've personally corrected already 20+ of your matchings, mostly on Catholic dioceses - but that might be somewhat comprehensible, since that one might be a bit tricky.
What is, IMHO, less comprehensible is the fact that you matched lots of catalogues items with Wikidata items about disambiguation pages. You're not the only one, but your nickname is the one who happens to occur (I took the liberty of counting them myself) 29 times out of 50, which is slightly more than a half times, more than the Auxiliary data matcher. And that doesn't take into account the last couple of matching I've corrected on the BBC Your Painting catalogue.
Please, pay more attention when you work on Mix 'n' match, and please double-check the work you've done until now. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Evening, Honfleur (Q20656239)
[edit]Can you expand Q20656239? Currently it doesn't meet the notability policy. If it's a mistake I can delete the item for you. Multichill (talk) 18:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Q19961798 and en:Wet (band)
[edit]Hi HCShannon, I'm wondering why you connected Q19961798 and en:Wet (band). Care to explain? Multichill (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Use of MoMA artwork id (P1397)
[edit]Please do not make statements adding P1397 MoMa object instance(!) references to object classes like here! Thanks in advance! --Marsupium (talk) 11:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Mix n' match - bis repetita
[edit]Someone already let you a message about your use of Mix n' match. You should only match when it's strictly about the same thing. Seriously, having to chek your work doesn't help at all. i would much prefer doing the work myself and doing it once instead of tracking your bad edits mixed in your good ones. stop using this tool if you don't understand how it work or please, please, learn to be more careful. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)