Marc-AntoineV

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Marc-AntoineV!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Armand Numès.png

File:Armand Numès.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 08:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Paintings by Gustave Courbet

Hi! I upload images of thousands of different artists, and each one has a different category tree. Unless the UploadWizard will make it possible to check categories during the upload process, at the moment it is too much work to do it manually one-by-one, so usually I just put the artist name+location. If sometimes I enter an artist category I move images quickly with cat-a-lot, and many more users do the same. That's the good of having a Community! I know my limit, but I already spend so many hours for shooting, preparing images and uploading... --Sailko (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:La Sirène Mallarmé.png

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 01:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Food

Curd Rice

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, we are going International. To make this event a grant success, your direction is key. Please sign up as a volunteer or sign up on behalf of your affiliate here.--Abhinav619 (talk) 06:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Fukushima Exclusion Zone April 2017.png

Copyright status: File:Fukushima Exclusion Zone April 2017.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fukushima Exclusion Zone April 2017.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@JuTa: thanks for your message. I have been trying to contact the Fukushima Prefecture Admnistration in order to get a common share license for this map. I sent a mail 8 days ago. Please feel free to delete this file. Yours, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 09:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Gustave Bertinot by Emile Lévy.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

MifterBot, there is no copyright restriction. --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Marc-AntoineV,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Alfred Roller photo.png

Yours sincerely, Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Currency prices on non-currency items

Concerning this edit of yours and others like it, please consider that currency prices marked on on non-currency items should be also categorized. If it bothers you that postage stamps, tram tickets, price tags, and other assorted items remain categorized directly under the main category of a currency unit (Category:Portuguese escudo , in the case at hand) once all currency items were dissiminated into bankonte and coin categories (which I can relate to), then lets create a new subcat — maybe Category:Face value in Portuguese escudos (not legal tender), what do you think? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: hello, yes this is a good idea. Let's do it. Regards, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 23:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

•  Done -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Maurice Tranchant 1931.jpg

Copyright status: File:Maurice Tranchant 1931.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Maurice Tranchant 1931.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) 04:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hermann Maurice Cossmann portrait.png

Copyright status: File:Hermann Maurice Cossmann portrait.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hermann Maurice Cossmann portrait.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bords de l'Orne by Le Goaesbe de Bellée.png

Copyright status: File:Bords de l'Orne by Le Goaesbe de Bellée.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bords de l'Orne by Le Goaesbe de Bellée.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Léon Maillard ou M. L.B. de Royaumont

Sur cette image :

File:Léon Maillard au 58e anniversaire de la mort de Balzac (Btv1b6910866n f1).jpg

, je pense qu'il s'agit de M. de Royaumont, comme le dit la légende d'origine : "M. L. B. de Royaumont lit un discours au 58e anniversaire de la mort de Balzac [1908]". Il a d'ailleurs la même tête sur cette photo de 1909 : . https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b53109871z --Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Mais oui vous avez totalement raison. La photo est mal identifiée. merci ! --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 17:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Merci de votre réponse, j'ai demandé le renommage. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 17:49, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Edouard Pail painter.png

Copyright status: File:Edouard Pail painter.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Edouard Pail painter.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Edgard de Montzaigle Figaro-Salon Demi Vierges.png

Copyright status: File:Edgard de Montzaigle Figaro-Salon Demi Vierges.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Edgard de Montzaigle Figaro-Salon Demi Vierges.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Marcel Lecoultre portrait LMLP 1908.png

Copyright status: File:Marcel Lecoultre portrait LMLP 1908.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marcel Lecoultre portrait LMLP 1908.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Colonne Morris à Onex

Category:Colonne Morris, rue des Bossons 88, Onex : Onex est en Suisse, où on utilise aussi le terme "Colonne Morris". La catégorie Category:Colonnes Morris se trouve sous Category:Advertising columns in France, donc concerne la France. MHM (talk) 15:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

@MHM55: ah oui merci. Il faut ranger cette catégorie dans Advertising columns. --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 15:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

oui, dans Category:Advertising columns in Switzerland :-) -- MHM (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Pour info, j'ai fait ce classement depuis 5 jours => Category:Poster_artists_by_country. --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Georges Imann Comoedia juin 1930.png

Copyright status: File:Georges Imann Comoedia juin 1930.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Georges Imann Comoedia juin 1930.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Peinture

(Je mets en copie @User:Moreau.henri, l'utilisateur ayant fait le premier ajout, pour info de ma demande afin de savoir quelle a été la justification au fait de ce remplacement) Bonjour, je me permets de vous écrire à propos d'une peinture : File:118 Léon Le Goaebe de Bellée En forêt, le givre.JPG. Vous avez remplacé un fichier préexistant avec une nouvelle version, cependant, je voulais savoir quelle en est la justification, car la version précédente est moins floue et plus en correspondance avec l’œuvre du musée. Pardonnez moi de préciser que votre version photographique de la peinture ne met pas en valeur le travail du peintre. Sans justification de votre part, je me permettrais d'annuler votre ajout pour revenir à la version précédente. Il n'aurait pas fallu supplanter l'oeuvre, mais créer un nouveau fichier car votre version de l’œuvre est totalement différente de l'autre. Merci par avance pour votre réponse, cordialement, Marion Leconte (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

@User:Marion Leconte bonjour, je ne comprends pas bien vos questions. En fait, j'ai initié cet article, pour le reste vous pouvez ajouter ou modifier comme vous le souhaitez, bien entendu en respectant les règles de cette encyclopédie (référencements, etc.) ce que vous semblez faire de toutes façons. Très bonne journée, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 11:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

en fait je parle de cette peinture : Le givre que vous avez modifiée par un ajout le 4 janvier 2022 (cf Historique du fichier). Il y avait déjà un fichier, vous en avez rajouté un par dessus. Pourrait-on reprendre le fichier original qui est moins flou ? Dans votre version on voit mal les détails. Pourrait-on envisager d'avoir deux fichiers différents pour choisir celui qu'on utilise dans l'article ? Concernant l'article, rien à redire, il est intéressant. Je l'ai complété mais je n'ai pas de remarques à faire, si ce n'est vous remercier de l'avoir initié. Cordialement. Marion Leconte (talk) 11:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Ce que je propose c'est de "rétablir" le fichier original de l'image et que vous puissiez ré-importer votre fichier mais dans un fichier à part. Il y aura ainsi deux versions de la peinture. Dites moi si cela vous convient. Marion Leconte (talk) 12:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

@User:Marion Leconte écoutez, l'ancien fichier est jaune, encadré, et absolument non conforme à ce que la toile devrait être. Si vous disposez d'un nouveau fichier (je n'en connais point d'autres), pourquoi ne pas l'exporter vous-même ? Je n'ai hélas pas le temps de m'en occuper. Cdlt, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 12:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

OK. Je laisse tel quel car je ne suis pas l'auteure du fichier d'origine. Mais je trouve que si le premier cliché est effectivement jaune, avec un cadre et qqs ombres liées au cadre, en revanche le second cliché est flou, sombre et d'une résolution qui ne permet pas de zoomer. Donc les deux fichiers ayant des contraintes, ils auraient aussi bien pu co-exister dans la catégorie du peintre, ça aurait été intéressant, je trouve de pouvoir visionner les deux. Maintenant, si je fais la manip moi même (télécharger votre version de l'image pour la ré-importer) le problème c'est que ça va créer un fichier en mon nom or je ne sais pas d'où vient le cliché donc je ne serai pas en règle concernant les droit d'auteurs. Cordialement. Marion Leconte (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

@User:Marion Leconte attendez je tente un truc... Je vous tiens au courant ce soir. Cdlt, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 17:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

@User:Marion Leconte voilà j'ai tenté de supprimer le flou avec une nouvelle image. Pour bien faire il faudrait demander l'original au musée de Vannes. Là j'utilise une sorte de carte postale (?) sans droits d'auteur d'ailleurs et sans doute un tirage Goupil. --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

D'accord, je vous remercie. J'ai donc en conséquence rétabli l'image précédente, ainsi on a deux version de la peinture, une dans un cadre et l'autre sans le cadre. A voir s'il est également possible de demander au musée de Vannes ou encore aux autres musées qui conservent ses œuvres. A suivre. Cordialement. Marion Leconte (talk) 19:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

PS : j'ai remplacé l'image dans les pages "charbonnière" et "Ploërmel". Cependant, je laisse la peinture dans le cadre pour la page "musée des Beaux-Arts" de Vannes car elle est appropriée dans son cadre pour une telle page. Cordialement, Marion Leconte (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Portrait of Pierre Loti by Gaston Manchon 1886.png

Copyright status: File:Portrait of Pierre Loti by Gaston Manchon 1886.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Pierre Loti by Gaston Manchon 1886.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Drawings in /from

Bonjour, de mémoire, les deux existent. Drawings from France désigne des œuvres dessinées par un artiste français. Cette catégorie est particulièrement utile lorsque l'œuvre est conservée à l'étranger ou en une localisation inconnue. Cela permet de retrouver des dessins d'artistes français qu'on pourrait ne pas retrouver autrement. Drawings in France concerne des œuvres situées en France, qu'elles soient d'un artiste français (cas le plus courant) ou d'un artiste étranger. Je crois que pour les peintures, il y aPaintings in France mais que Paintings from France n'existe que pour des sous-catégories comme Landscape paintings..., Genre paintings... ou Portrait paintings.... Chacune des catégories existe par siècle, décennie et année. J'espère avoir été assez clair. À bientôt. --Birdie (talk) 07:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Merci pour ton explication très claire ! Bien à toi, et bonne semaine, Marc-AntoineV (talk) 09:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Maurice Lobre by Louis Breslau 1903.png

Copyright status: File:Maurice Lobre by Louis Breslau 1903.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Maurice Lobre by Louis Breslau 1903.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)