User talk:Huntster

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21

ESA insignia

hey, thanks for this File:Euclid launch kit cover insignia.png! Maybe you can also remove background of this insignia? Artem.G (talk) 07:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

found that this already exists, sorry for bothering! Artem.G (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@Artem.G: It's no worry at all. I'll get that other file structured and categorized properly. In the meantime, would you like me to delete the file you uploaded as redundant? — Huntster (t @ c) 13:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

yes, please do, thanks a lot! Artem.G (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Artist concept of the Juno mission to Jupiter (enhanced by rawpixel).jpg

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Image ok?

Recently uploaded image File:PIA25726-Jupiter+MoonIo-Juno-20230731.jpg - may be ok but not sure at the moment - maybe check if possible? - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 11:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan: see edits here. The CC license was explicit, especially on the Junocam site, so PD template should not have been used. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

@Huntster: - Excellent - Thank You for your review and efforts with this - it's greatly appreciated - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ - Drbogdan (talk) 14:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Image ok? → File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231129.jpg

May need help with this recently uploaded image - not sure at the moment → File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231129.jpg<nowiki> - Thanks in advance for your help with this - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 14:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan, if it had a cc-by-nc-sa license, why was it uploaded? NC and ND licenses are never permitted on Commons, at least by themselves. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank You for your comments - seems the image license was → CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (and associated seemingly with a NASA website - at https://science.nasa.gov/missions/tess/discovery-alert-watch-the-synchronized-dance-of-a-6-planet-system/) - which I thought was ok - but perhaps not after all - seems some of my understanding of image conditions may be ok - but not others - guess I'm still learning about the various image conditions - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC) -- BRIEF Followup → Is a "Speedy Delete" of the image file indicated? - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan, yes, just being released on a NASA website does not mean an image is public domain. NASA routinely publishes media from ESA, Roscosmos, ISRO, JAXA, commercial and private sources, etc. If the media credit line does not start with "NASA/" then it cannot be assumed to be public domain, and even then there may be restrictions. The author must be a federal government employee or someone directly contracted to NASA under a specific NASA program contract. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments - and removing the image - it's appreciated - Thanks again - and - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ - Drbogdan (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

@Huntster: - BRIEF Followup - hope the related newly uploaded image (ie, File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231130.jpg for the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_110067 article) has an ok cc license (ie, "CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO") - should be ok at least afaik atm - hope this image is *entirely* ok - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan, yes, it is fine. In fact, I found a higher resolution version on the ESA website. Please see the changes I've made to the file description page, particularly the license template changed and the over-categorization removed. Try to avoid such redundant categories. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thank You very mucḧ for your comments - and efforts with the images - they're ̈all greatlÿ appreciated - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ -Drbogdan (talk)

OK? => File:BaileysBeads-DoubleDiamondRingEclipse-20190702.jpg

Hello - Seems the image ("File:BaileysBeads-DoubleDiamondRingEclipse-20190702.jpg") is ok - but a second-opinion may be worthwhile nonetheless - to be even more sure - Thank You in any regards for your review if possible of course - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 19:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan: So, it's always better to upload from the original source. I have done so while keeping the crop. The reason is that the website you found is not licensed under Creative Commons, so copying their text is a copyright violation. I've updated the description page to reflect the NOIRlabs material, which is Creative Commons. Also, try to check that the image in question isn't already uploaded to Commons; in this case, the full version was previously uploaded to File:Baily's beads 2 July 2019 from CTIO (20190702 Perlas Baily DMunizaga HighRes-CC).jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)