User talk:Huntster

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21

Image ok? → File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231129.jpg

May need help with this recently uploaded image - not sure at the moment → File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231129.jpg<nowiki> - Thanks in advance for your help with this - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 14:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drbogdan, if it had a cc-by-nc-sa license, why was it uploaded? NC and ND licenses are never permitted on Commons, at least by themselves. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your comments - seems the image license was → CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (and associated seemingly with a NASA website - at https://science.nasa.gov/missions/tess/discovery-alert-watch-the-synchronized-dance-of-a-6-planet-system/) - which I thought was ok - but perhaps not after all - seems some of my understanding of image conditions may be ok - but not others - guess I'm still learning about the various image conditions - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC) -- BRIEF Followup → Is a "Speedy Delete" of the image file indicated? - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drbogdan, yes, just being released on a NASA website does not mean an image is public domain. NASA routinely publishes media from ESA, Roscosmos, ISRO, JAXA, commercial and private sources, etc. If the media credit line does not start with "NASA/" then it cannot be assumed to be public domain, and even then there may be restrictions. The author must be a federal government employee or someone directly contracted to NASA under a specific NASA program contract. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments - and removing the image - it's appreciated - Thanks again - and - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ - Drbogdan (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Huntster: - BRIEF Followup - hope the related newly uploaded image (ie, File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231130.jpg for the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_110067 article) has an ok cc license (ie, "CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO") - should be ok at least afaik atm - hope this image is *entirely* ok - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drbogdan, yes, it is fine. In fact, I found a higher resolution version on the ESA website. Please see the changes I've made to the file description page, particularly the license template changed and the over-categorization removed. Try to avoid such redundant categories. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Huntster: Thank You very mucḧ for your comments - and efforts with the images - they're ̈all greatlÿ appreciated - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ -Drbogdan (talk)

OK? => File:BaileysBeads-DoubleDiamondRingEclipse-20190702.jpg

Hello - Seems the image ("File:BaileysBeads-DoubleDiamondRingEclipse-20190702.jpg") is ok - but a second-opinion may be worthwhile nonetheless - to be even more sure - Thank You in any regards for your review if possible of course - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 19:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drbogdan: So, it's always better to upload from the original source. I have done so while keeping the crop. The reason is that the website you found is not licensed under Creative Commons, so copying their text is a copyright violation. I've updated the description page to reflect the NOIRlabs material, which is Creative Commons. Also, try to check that the image in question isn't already uploaded to Commons; in this case, the full version was previously uploaded to File:Baily's beads 2 July 2019 from CTIO (20190702 Perlas Baily DMunizaga HighRes-CC).jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You ̈*very mucḧ* for your efforts with this - and your explanations and suggestions - seems like a lot more to this than I was thinking at first - Thanks again - and - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 21:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Newly processed images of Uranus and Neptune?

@Huntster: (and/or other) - May need help in adding an image[1] re a very recent processing of the planets Uranus and Neptune to Wikipedia, and being currently discussed on the Neptune talk-page - best images for the Uranus and Neptune articles may be crops of the latest processed images of Uranus and Neptune from the available published multi-image presentation[1] I would think - seems to be open-source (and CC-BY 4.0?) and ok but not sure at the moment - Thank You in advance for your help with this if possible - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ↑ a b Patrick,G (12 September 2023). "Modelling the seasonal cycle of Uranus’s colour and magnitude, and comparison with Neptune". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527 (4): 11521-11538. DOI:10.1093/mnras/stad3761. Archived from the original on 7 January 2024. Retrieved on 7 January 2024.

Drbogdan (talk) 01:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drbogdan: Article is indeed published under a CC-by-4.0 license, so the images should be fine. I'm unsure what the correct credits should be for https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/434837998/stad3761fig8.jpg, though the credits are explicit for https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/434837964/stad3761fig2.jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Drbogdan, would you mind if I uploaded higher resolution versions from https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/434837998/stad3761fig8.jpg? — Huntster (t @ c) 22:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
̪Thank You for your comments - and suggestion - no problem whatsoever - higher resolution images may have recently been added by an editor to the Uranus and Neptune main articles, but not clear about details re the newly added images - in any case - yes - entirely ok with me re your suggestion of course - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ ̴̴ Drbogdan (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raised pavement markings

Hi, I noticed you recently moved several files of mine to this category (2022-06-12 10 59 27 A blue pavement reflector along Mountain View Road in the Mountainview section of Ewing Township, Mercer County, New Jersey.jpg, 2022-06-12 11 00 14 A blue pavement reflector along Mountain View Road in the Mountainview section of Ewing Township, Mercer County, New Jersey.jpg, and 2022-06-12 11 00 20 A blue pavement reflector along Mountain View Road in the Mountainview section of Ewing Township, Mercer County, New Jersey.jpg). Its my understanding that the intent for this category is for RAISED pavement markings (i.e., ones which are intended to create a noticeable bump as well as reflect light), which these are not intended to do (it may be hard to tell, but they are essentially flush with the pavement, a necessity in the snow-prone northeastern United States). Is there a definition of these items which I'm not familiar with which includes those which are flush with the pavement, or was this an error? Famartin (talk) 22:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Famartin, since you don't believe they fit that category, I have moved them back. Looking at it more closely, I feel like a specific "Raised reflective markers" category should be made, since "Raised pavement markers" can encompass non-reflective markers as well. But, I suppose that's an issue for another time. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I notice the Wikipedia article its tagged with has a completely different name, so perhaps some significant reshuffling should be done. Famartin (talk) 23:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Famartin: Yes, I've fixed the Commons-Wikidata association. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If possible - *copyright status* of recent Back Hole image[1][2] by the Event Horizon Telescope may be helpful in uploading a worthy image (imo) - unable to locate copyright status - so far - any help with this would be appreciated - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ↑ Staff (27 March 2024). "Astronomers Unveil Strong Magnetic Fields Spiraling at the Edge of Milky Way’s Central Black Hole". Event Horizon Telescope. Archived from the original on 27 March 2024. Retrieved on 28 March 2024.
  2. ↑ Ouellette, Jennifer (27 March 2024). "Event Horizon Telescope captures stunning new image of Milky Way’s black hole - There are also hints of an elusive high-energy jet, similar to larger M87* black hole.". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved on 28 March 2024.

Drbogdan (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Huntster&oldid=863961906"