Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 72.229.251.230 (talk) at 09:12, 21 January 2014 (→http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_May_(stage_actress)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Erick Kaffka

Administrator failed to research credits given through SAG-AFTRA, Erick Kaffka has 6 acting credits given by the productions in addition to a starring role on an entire season of Welcome to Paradox, and starring roles on 2 episodes of Untold Stories of the ER. His charity work and advocacy with the disabled through show business is highly notable. He is also the only double AK amputee actor in North America. The administrator stated in his reasons for deletion that the "actor known to date exclusively for extra or stunt double roles" is potentially damaging to this person's career as this is not a researched fact. See IMDB and notice the CREDITED roles. Erick Kaffka has not done background work since 1999. For future reference, a Stunt Double is a recognized credit by the The Academy of Motion Pictures & Sciences, and The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences and is not an unimportant job. Also I am not his agent, his original bio was taken from my fundraiser website that he was the keynote speaker for by someone unknown to me and placed on IMDB. Your administrators need to do more research on subjects (especially pertaining to people). All you have to do is google this person to see all of the articles written about him across the globe. Perhaps you should allow more time for other contributors to add. If you are going to leave it deleted, then please remove the part about him not only doing "extra or stunt double roles" This is clearly not the case.-Paraisoevents (talk) 04:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Please note that Wikipedia has a very specific definition of notability - only subjects that multiple third-party reliable sources with no connection to the subject have written about are notable by Wikipedia's standards. See also our username policy, because irrespective of whether or not you are his agent, your username gives the impression that you are editing on behalf of a company. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Machel Waikenda

Hello everyone. The article was deleted under G5 because the article was created by an user who's account got blocked later because of Sock Puppetry. But I think the article had the notability to be enlisted on Wikipedia. So, is there any way to restore this article? I can fix it if it has some neutrality issues. -Sourov0000 (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A G5 can be restored provided that you are willing to accept responsibility for the banned user's edits. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if accepting the responsibility is allowed according to the rules of Wikipedia yet. If it doesn't violate any rules, then it can be taken. As the user was banned, he certainly made many Vandalism edits in Wikipedia. If fixing the article to meet Wikipedia's Guideline is the thing, then I will be able to do it. Sourov0000 (talk) 03:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Accepting the responsibility for a banned user's constructive edits has always been allowed, and edits have been reinstated under that basis before. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I will take the responsibility of the constructive edits of the banned user. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 13:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jesús Omar Rivera

RESOLVED
Undeleted through WP:DRV. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy deleted under A7 (no indication of importance) but the subject is quite notable per WP:BASIC and the following reliable sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Subject has appeared in WKAQ-TV, WAPA-TV, WLII-TV, and WIPR-TV. He also appears every week as a guest on WPRM-FM. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC) -—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Erra_(band)

I believe that this was in error, as I cannot see why this article does not have importance or significance. Band articles a very good place for users like myself to get information on the group, and this was how I noticed that Erra's had been deleted. I would like to understand the reasoning as to why the article was deleted, and see if it is possible to have it reinstated. Thanks for an help!

On 26 November, 2011 user Phantomsteve deleted the article: "18:02, 26 November 2011 Phantomsteve (talk -DougeryThuggery (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Wikipedia is quite selective about subjects for articles, and does not expect to have articles about every band. The WP:Notability standard for bands is explained at WP:BAND. This article, when deleted in 2011, gave no indication that Erra qualified - they had not yet released an album. That was two years ago: if you think they now qualify, reply below here and I will "userfy" the article for you - move it into your user space where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stavros Damianides

reasoning -Ephestion (talk) 23:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC) The article had two pages with slightly different spelling Stavros Damianidis and Stavros Damianides.[reply]

The one with the surname spelt with "idis" on the end was to catch searches with alternative spelling of the main article found at Stavros Damianides.

When removing the page with the spelling "idis" someone also deleted Stavros Damianides. The latter has been ratified by the Walk About Magazine, Western Austrlian Neswpaper, some other paper clips, also video footage of him playing on the Chanel 9 TV station stage was available. I believe it was an accidental deletion and should be returned. I am not the creator or maintainer of the article.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SQRA

I, 110.142.45.106, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 110.142.45.106 (talk) 02:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zeecrowd

The page was flagged for deletion because I seems I had not provided the right sotfware category for Zeecrowd -JabberBee (talk) 10:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. No, it was deleted because it gave no indication that the product is important or significant enough to have an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a product listing directory. The inclusion criterion is called WP:Notability and requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. From your username, it seems that in relation to this product you have a conflict of interest and should also read the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sina gharib

IT SHOULD NOT BE DELETED AS SINA GHARIB IS A LIGITMATE PUBLIC FIGURE, PLEASE SEE THE REFRENCES ON THE PAGE AND THE FILMS HE HAS BEEN IN, HIS TWITTER PAGE ALSO @SINAGHARIB... THANKS ALAN. (SINA GHARIBS MANAGER) -Alansmith111 (talk) 13:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Also you should really read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, because you clearly have one. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Haene

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sandro.friedrich (talk) 17:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will ahve to add independent reliable references, not just IMDB and their own web site. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karen L. Page

I, 23.242.28.82, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 23.242.28.82 (talk) 19:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I was not knowledgable enough on programming to make this page work, but if you reinstate it I will have someone with programming skills review it to see if we can fix it and make it passable by your standards.

Thank you.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/K. Anis Ahmed

I, Evelyn727, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Evelyn727 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tom, Dick & Harry Creative Co.

Dbrashears (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/4K Stogram

I, Alex miller 034, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Alex miller 034 (talk) 08:36, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saltire Housing Design Awards

wish to retrieve the material so I can make the alterations to allow it to be published -Aly.saltiresociety (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.saltiresociety.org.uk/awards/architecture/‎. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teardrop turn

I, Karl Andrews, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Karl Andrews (talk) 15:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thrahimam

The Album Thrahimam consists of 7 songs from Andhra Keerthanalu (Andhra Christian Hymnal) which are regularly sung in all Churches of Andhra Pradesh. All songs are historic and have great meaning. Please do not delete this page. - Hiramrajkamal (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - I have moved the page into your "user space" at User:Hiramrajkamal/Thrahimam where you can work on it. If it is to be kept, it needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability, see also WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah

I, Electoralreform, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Electoralreform (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The CMO Survey

I, 24.88.255.253, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 24.88.255.253 (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. In order to establish WP:Notability, you need references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toptalent.in

reasoning -Silus151 (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yadavan Chandran

I, 121.246.80.28, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 121.246.80.28 (talk) 08:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tubal Rabbi Cain

Tubal Rabbi Cain is a Nigerian Writer. According to the Publication titled The Damascus Document by globally acclaimed Precious Styles Publishers Limited, He was born at Etinan within the South Eastern Coastal Areas of Nigeria on the 29th of September, 1964. Tubal Rabbi Cain is a member of the Inner Circle of Poets, the Association of Nigerian Authors and the Underground Poets Society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.190.4.30 (talk) 12:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tubal Rabbi Cain, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Addshore (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nawab Faizunnessa Govt. Girls' High School

I found this page on NPP, and it's a notable school but was a poor article. I put in the time and effort to add references and format correctly, but the originator came back and reverted my edits repeatedly, and then an Admin CSD'ed the page for advertising but went on a wikibreak right after so I can't get them personally to undelete. The originator then returned and re-created the page as Nawab Faizunnesa Govt. Girls’ High School, but with the same promotional tone and lack of proper sourcing. Can someone please undelete the version I actually brought up to snuff, and then we can get rid of the competing POV fork? MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC) -MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I have left Jimfbleak a note, since he is evidently still around - he just deleted the new fork. I will explain to the originator that re-spamming it will just get it deleted again. JohnCD (talk)

Full Cycle Recordings

Disagree that it is not a notable record label. Home of Roni Size, Krust, Die et al who were fundamental in the increase in popularity of Drum and Bass music in late 1990's and early 2000's. It is in the opinion of "explicit" that it is not a notable record label, and as such should not have been removed. No more than I could remove the label of an artist I deemed to be lacking of note!! -2.218.16.159 (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The article may yet be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. What it needs is references: Wikipedia:Notability is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Terry Wollman

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. The article was deleted while I was in the process of finding sources. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Anne Delong:  Done. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Projection_Art

I, 96.33.16.7, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 96.33.16.7 (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There does not appear to be any actual content yet, only headings, links and "See also". Read WP:Your first article and WP:Writing better articles for guidance on what an encyclopedia article should look like. JohnCD (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dolma Lhakang

I wish to improve the article so that it is of greater value, and no longer fails on the stated deletion criteria. -Glenn Oliver (talk) 16:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Glenn Oliver/Dolma Lhakang. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Toddst1 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 22:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Boxing Hall of Fame Las Vegas, again

I, Boxinghalloffame, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Boxinghalloffame (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already  Done, five days ago, in response to your first request. @Boxinghalloffame: see message on your talk page. Also, please read the message below that which says you need to request a change of username.
Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The article needs references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manosphere

31.33.46.55 (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Gedamu Woldegiorgis (Aboy Gedamu)

I, Ynegede, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. The information presented on this page is relevant to a subculture of people living in diaspora who seek to better understand their history. -Ynegede (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. As discussed in the comments, the important issue is references. I appreciate that that is a problem in this field, but the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy is non-negotiable. References need not be on-line or in English, but they must have been published so that, in principle, an enquirer could check them. For that reason, oral tradition or private papers are not acceptable. JohnCD (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charles P. O'Brien

I am back to try editing this article to address the problems identified by the editor. Please undelete it. Alternatively, if I should resubmit from scratch, i can do that, but I was hoping to re-read the editor's critique, to ensure that I respond to them. Thanks. -TMASI999 (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stef Jackson

I, 64.229.167.164, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 64.229.167.164 (talk) 05:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article, and note the need for references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources (a) to verify what the article says, and (b) to establish WP:Notability to the standard of WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sampath Kumar

Sampath kumar Medavarapu; Born on 5-3-1955; at Kakinada [AndhraPradesh] Sanskrit scholar; Translated 64 Tantras from sanskrit to Telugu language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msbsb (talk • contribs) 09:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You started to re-create this, but I have restored your previous submission, which was fuller, and you can add to that. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to verify what the article says and establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 09:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relative Visual Performance

I, Heinrich.morgen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. the article was not taken care of by me for some time, but it still has it's relevance Heinrich.morgen (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

/* */ new section

I'm requesting this list to be userfied, in order to incubate it per WP:PRESERVE. As the Article incubator is likely to be closed soon, I plan to move it to Draft. The closer admin has mailed me the contents of the list, but the comments in it cannot be used without the article's history attribution. Diego (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC) -Diego (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doing. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, I userfied every revision from both deleted articles at User:Diego Moya/List of Pomodoro technique software since there were no chronologically concurrent revisions. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

durgamohan

reasoning -115.244.230.120 (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: please give the exact title of the page you mean. We have never had pages called "durgamohan" or "Durgamohan", either in Articles for Creation or in the main encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NIAMA-REISSER TECHNOLOGY

To Whom It May Concern: The article should be undeleted because the user/admin. who deleted it, did so wrongfully! The article is not advertisement nor is it promoting any products, companies, etc. The article merely states how the technologies work, function and what they do. I am new to the wiki community and did not know, that the save button meant that the article was going to go live. I had not added any References yet! I had worked for three hours on the text -not counting the days of research- and did not save a copy of it either, I wanted to save it should something happen with my connection, etc. I was planning on adding pictures, links, references before submitting it. I have written permission from Heinz-Gustav Reisser and NIAMA-REISSER, LLC to edit and create this Technology Page!

Here the references:

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/business/2011/06/25/long-road-ahead.html http://www.dieselpowermag.com/news/1010dp_niama_reisser_a_new_car_company_is_born/ http://www.dieselpowermag.com/tech/1203dp_eight_companies_determained_to_change_diesel_engines_forever/photo_03.html http://2011-salon-auto-ch.www5.iomedia.infomaniak.ch/en/premieres/niama-reisser-llc-nr-1-0-22915 http://infotruck.blogspot.com/2012/02/trucks-r-d-usa.html http://www.motor-journal.com/2012/04/27/otto-diesel-wankel-reisser/heinz-stefan-und-heinz-gustav-reisser-kl/ http://www.idac.co.uk/enews/articles/200-mpg%20Car.pdf http://ansys.com/Hall+of+Fame/Archive/ch.2011.leaseHighlights http://fhotd64476.yuku.com/topic/61073#.UtluzRAo6M8 http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?p=1075 http://patents.justia.com/inventor/heinz-gustav-a-reisser http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/niama-reisser-llc-launches-a-crowd-funding-project-for-their-21-century-carbon-fiber-furniture-bathroom-fixtures-accessories-exclusive-meets-affordable-314629.htm http://www.google.com/patents/US7415962 https://www.facebook.com/pages/NiamaReisserLLC/155443127799466 http://www.youtube.com/user/NiamaReisserLLC http://www.reisser.com/ http://www.niamareisser.com/

I am looking forward to getting this article undeleted. Please be so kind as to add the above listed links, so that the references are there. Once it is undeleted, I will add the necessary pictures that I have.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alreim (talk • contribs) 18:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 It's irrelevent the number of sources you provide and whether or not you have written permission from them. We do not tolerate pages that serve the primary purpose of promoting their subject, and so G11 deletions (promotional/advert) are not undeleted as they would require a fundamental rewrite to be encyclopedia articles. We also do not accept the subject themselves, press releases for same, user-generated content sources, or context-free listings as sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have put this at Draft:Niama-Reisser Technology so that you can fix it up. We can do without sentences with surprise marks ! on them, as the idea is not to be amazing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keaton Beach, Florida

This is a populated place, and thus not able to be speedy deleted under "A7". (If the article was not actually about the community, disregard this.) -NE2 21:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - it was about a person. JohnCD (talk) 08:39, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mitsuo Aoki

I, Oldnoah, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Oldnoah (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Application Fluent Network (AFN)

reasoning -Dhorangic (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mitsuo Aoki

no basis for deletion, meets noteworth criteria -Oldnoah (talk) 21:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: This appears to actually not have been deleted as the original article; so the Articles for Creation page can be deleted, as the actual page already exists. Oldnoah (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)Oldnoah[reply]

checkY No action required. JohnCD (talk) 11:35, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/the lincoln curse

I, Mwilmichael, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I have more information regarding attribution. Mwilmichael (talk) 01:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Personality.png

It is the image used by the Personality userbox template, which is used by rather many people. This userbox is even listed on Userboxes/Userboxes. The admin, Explicit, seems to have gone from Wikipedia. The deletion log states "Lack of licensing information", but it seems the author of the userbox wasn't even contacted about it to correct the vandalism to his template... -⇐⇑©TriMoon™ Talk @ 22:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - the uploader of that image, who could maybe provide a license tag, has not edited since September 2012. I have edited the userbox to restore the image that was used before this one. JohnCD (talk) 11:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that's better as a dead-link *wink*⇐⇑©TriMoon™ Talk @ 15:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hillside Student Community School

I had a family health issue and have let this drop but intended to come back and work on it. It was deleted because I left it unedited for 6 months. -AlmostRenton (talk) 01:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Styles

PLease don't delete page bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandy Styles (talk • contribs) 03:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). ES&L 09:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hardex Brakes

The article is about one of the leading manufacturer in Automotive Brakes Industry -Hardexbrakes (talk) 06:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Email Types

I, Andrew Eugene, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate - want to improve and submit. Andrew Eugene (talk) 08:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Masia

reasoning -Hassan Ali id (talk) 16:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC) i would like to advocate that this article is valid and there are many reliable sources as you can see on the La Masia youth academy.[reply]

 Not done That article has not been deleted, nor is it up for deletion. Your inappropriate edits, however, have been ES&L 17:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noa Sheidlower

I need the page back so I can use what was written in it for reference -Maezi (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - I will not restore this, because there is no chance that it could be a Wikipedia article - stories of family and friends are not the sort of thing an encyclopedia is for. However, I will email you the text if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Live Nation Middle East

reasoning - to make the necessary edits requested.80.227.120.238 (talk) 05:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. What is needed is references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bambakomallophobia

From what I read from the Proposed Deletion log, it was deleted because the phenomenon was thought to be a hoax. It most certainly is not. Bambakomallophobia and other textile/texture related anxiety disorders (Bambakophobia, Eliophobia, etc.) are not hoaxes and in fact, many of the textile/texture related anxiety disorders are connected to one another. People actually SUFFER from this phobia, and the fact that Wikipedia deleted it adds to the stigma of the condition. From what I was able to read in the log, the article was actually quite accurate. Very little research has been done on sufferers of Bambakomallophobics and other related conditions, because of the stigma of hoax, but it may actually be a genetic phenomenon, unlike other specific phobias. Because of this, bambakomallophbia might not respond well to traditional treatments of specific phobia and anxiety disorders. I beg that this page be reinstatedGstridsigne (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC) -Gstridsigne (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It currently has no sources, however, and so is still a candidate for deletion - please add citations to reliable sources in order to prevent re-deletion. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I wasn't sure what was stated in the article, so I will do my best to clean it up to Wikipedia standards. Gstridsigne (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SPAMfighter

updated, improved quality and added references -193.9.159.226 (talk) 09:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: the deleted article has been re-created, and deletion is once again under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPAMfighter (2nd nomination). That is where you should comment, but please read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 13:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KIMONO JACK

I, Dr.Kimono, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Now verifiable from outside published source - Dr.Kimono (talk) 12:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

H V Kumar

H V Kumar is a highway legend in India. The page is dedicated to him and provides information about him to all other travelers on Indian highways and roads. The page lists his important achievements as well as links to his contact information. He provides invaluable service to lots of Indians who travel on highways and roads. Hence it is requested that this page be undeleted and restored in its earlier form. -49.187.169.96 (talk) 12:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. V. Kumar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

H._V._Kumar

I, 49.187.169.96, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 49.187.169.96 (talk) 12:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - see entry above. JohnCD (talk) 13:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sons of Liberty Spirits Company

Bricard (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit is as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references (a) to verify what the article says, and (b) to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Structure101

95.44.240.71 (talk) 15:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prince Albert Multicultural Council

I, 71.17.57.218, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 71.17.57.218 (talk) 16:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Albert Multicultural Council

i want to edit it and try to resubmit an article for our organizations profile in wikipedia -71.17.57.218 (talk) 16:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I have restored your Articles for Creation submission, see item above, for you to work on, but this directly-submitted article was a copy of the organization's website. Wikipedia cannot accept copyright material unless a formal copyright release is made; no doubt you could do that, but it is seldom worth doing because an organization's own website usually has an unsuitably promotional tone - an encyclopedia is not a place for organizations to "tell the world" about themselves. For advice, read:
JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MonsterMortgage.ca

I, Tdlieu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Tdlieu (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Christianson

No idea why this page would have been deleted. This is a real person and a coach in the national football league. Should be available when clicking on the coaching staff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.55.169 (talk) 20:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Foot Skiff

I, CamV8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. CamV8 (talk) 00:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

H._V._Kumar

This is a request for undeletion of this page. Contrary to the perception around of H V Kumar not being a huge celebrity, he has a significant fan following and acceptance among the users of Indian highways. A simple Google search will return a lot of articles and mentions about him and his immense knowledge around Indian highways https://www.google.com/search?q=H+V+kumar. Given the complexity of the highways and roads in India and with so little information publicly available online, he performs a great service to his followers who reach out to him for help with directions and guidance while traveling. This page by listing his achievements but also his contacts allows a lot more highway users to start following him and be part of his group. Hence it is requested that this page be restored to its original form and whatever else is needed to maintain this page will be done by the group members. Thanks. -203.41.19.147 (talk) 01:03, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told twice that this page will not be undeleted here and to go to WP:Deletion review instead. Any further posting of requests about this will be removed. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete article for creation (Snatch Magnet)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Snatch Magnet

I, Wikiwikibawwah, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Wikiwikibawwah (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Bollinger

Can you undelete prior revisions, now that the current version is substantially different from deleted version? -George Ho (talk) 04:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Truck Ads

I was contacted by Hasteurbot about the page getting ready to be deleted if I don't edit it. When I first created it, I thought I was following proper guidelines and it would get published. Obviously I was wrong and this time I would like to successfully publish the creation and could use help in doing it properly. So I want to try again. -Rodoharris (talk) 07:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. please provide references to get this approved and resubmit. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monica May (stage_actress)

reasoning -72.229.251.230 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

She is a famous actress and deserves noting even if some of the links in the page don't work...

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=591690262"