Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Comment requested regarding Moody's

Over the past several months I have developed well-researched replacement material for Wikipedia's current treatment of Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service and Moody's Analytics. Currently there are two pages: Moody's and Moody's Analytics, but both are under-written, poorly organized and generally neglected. It is important to note that I am working with Moody's on this project, so I wish to be very careful in obtaining community consensus and following Wikipedia's COI guidelines. In recent weeks I have begun seeking feedback from editors, primarily on the Moody's Talk page, regarding three separate drafts for what I intend to be high-quality, non-promotional and well-rounded articles on these subjects. I would like to invite anyone who is interested to review this material and weigh in on the Moody's discussion page, and/or on the Moody's Analytics discussion as well. I welcome any and all helpful comments. Many thanks, Mysidae (talk) 23:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Could someone look at the Lion Capital page?

I've posted a comment on the Talk page for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Capital_LLP about a factual error at the top of the page, but not edited the page directly myself (because of COI reasons). As the talk and history sections there are pretty quiet, can I encourage someone to go over and take a look? Thanks. Markpackuk (talk) 17:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Samsung Electronics vs. Samsung Group

Hey I am new to the discussions although I have always been helpful in donating time and money to Wikipedia. Whenever I notice something small like a typing error, I kindly edit it.

Although now I encountered something that is too big to just edit. Hence, I would like to discuss it and see what can be done.

In the list of world's largest companies by total revenues, Samsung Electronics is mentioned, but the parent company Samsung Group is omitted. Shouldn't the two be switched for good measurement as it is the parent companies that count, instead of the individual subsidiaries? If so, Samsung Group would be in the top 10 largest companies in the world by total revenues.

What do you guys think?

Kind regards

Curacaoan (talk) 00:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Diamond Match Company

Is there someone that can look at the article Diamond Match Company for possible copyright violations. I transferred most of the article (listed as a history section with references) to the talk page until this can be checked out. Otr500 (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

The Glover Park Group

To anyone watching this page: The Glover Park Group is a political communications firm based in DC that does not currently have an article, although the company easily passes WP:CORP. Working on their behalf, I have written an article following Wikipedia guidelines, especially some relevant to this WikiProject, as I have explained in more detail on the Paid Editor Help page of WikiProject Cooperation. I would like to encourage editors who are part of this project to add their comments on this proposed new article.

The draft article for review is here, in my user space: User:WWB Too/The Glover Park Group

Despite my conflict of interest I have aimed to write about the company's operations and history in an even-handed manner, however I am open to suggestions about specific wording or inclusion of details. I welcome all constructive suggestions, preferably at Paid Editor Help. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 03:47, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Of Possible Interest

Of possible interest to Wikiproject participants here is Wikiproject Cooperation, an effort to foster more positive collaborations with COI editors. WWB Too (above) and myself are both participants. I've also submitted the topic of paid editing for consideration at Wikimania here for anyone interested. King4057 (talk) 08:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Fortune 100

I noticed we don't have categories for Fortune 100 companies. I haven't checked on other indexes, but several are very popular. I would think such categories would be very useful. Is there a reason why we don't have this, or can I get cracking on it? I'm surveying Fortune 100 companies here anyway, so it wouldn't be a problem for me to add the category to all of them by the end of the week. Thoughts? Rklawton (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I would love to have tags for f100 or f500 or even the global 1000; not sure why they're not here now. I seem to recall some drama over copyrighted lists with the forbes richest lists (for individuals), but those are driven off of intellectual effort (it's not so simple to determine someone's net worth), instead of a simple measure such as gross revenue. Kuru (talk) 01:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
I would think the same issues (if any) would apply to the Fortune 100 list. I'm assuming, of course, that it's Fortune Magazine's list. Thoughts? Rklawton (talk) 01:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Discipline Global Mobile

Hi! I have expanded the article, Discipline Global Mobile, about Robert Fripp's music label. Review by an editor experience in company articles would be appreciated. Thanks!

Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


Crain Communications History Section Edit

Hi, I’d like to propose to edit the current Crain Communications history section. The current history contains incorrect statements and lacks reliable sources, and the draft I have proposed in my sandbox User:ChauTime/CrainSandbox addresses both these issues. I have posted my suggestions on the Talk:Crain Communications page and had an initial response from another poster, but have not heard back from this person in several days, so the edits have not yet been made. Can someone please take a look at my suggested history update and post the changes if you feel they improve the overall section of the article? I am a current employee of Crain Communications and would prefer to refrain from posting edits myself due to my conflict of interest (also noted on my user page). Thanks! --ChauTime (talk) 13:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Halo Burger

I am in an arguement with another editor on the Halo Burger article conducted on my talk page and the article's talk page. He wants to only claim that the company was found in 1923 do to the company logo and even sources the company's website. He shows me other source including one written by him, that supposedly indicate that it was found then, to which I point out that those are indirect quotes from the now former owner or indicate an "evolved" instead of one date foundation, since Halo Burger is a spin off business. So any outside opinions would be welcome. Spshu (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

List of companies of Belgium

I have just started a requested move over at List of companies of Belgium, and it doesn't look like many people are watching it. If anyone would like to comment, I'd be very grateful. The discussion is being held at Talk:List of companies of Belgium#Requested move. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 06:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

A very specific list of non-controversial edits in mainspace ... for companies

Hi everyone. I started a draft essay at User:Eclipsed/A very specific list of non-controversial edits in mainspace. It's an attempt to list very specific instances of non-controversial edits in mainspace, with examples. Of interest to project members, one section is a list of non-controversial edits specific to company articles. It's not complete, nor has the community agreed to anything listed there. That's why You can edit the draft right now and improve it. Thanks. Eclipsed   (talk)   (COI Declaration)   14:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Crain Communication New Section

Hi - I am proposing to add a "Publications" section to the Crain Communications page. The article currently lacks information on any of Crain's 30 publications. I think adding this section will improve the article as a whole, and will provide useful information to readers. The proposed section can be found in my sandbox: User:ChauTime/CrainPublicationsSandbox. I have mentioned on the Crain Communications talk page, as well as my user page, that I am a current employee of Crain Communications' Autoweek. Due to my conflict of interest, I prefer to not post the edits on my own. Can someone please post the suggested section if you agree and think it will add to the overall article? Thanks!--ChauTime (talk) 18:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I added a {{Request edit}} tag to Talk:Crain Communications. This may help draw the attention of volunteers who can assist in reviewing the draft. Eclipsed   (talk)   (COI Declaration)   18:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Company

Some consistency would help users to locate industries by type and for editors to create better indexes. The guidance on the toolbox clearly suggests that primary industry/marketplace be used and gives an example. There are a variety of classification systems that can be used though that would help editors (see Industry_classification) but the one used by the dowjones, the ftse and nasdaq etc is the Industry Classification Benchmark Given that most of the worlds largest companies are on one of these indexes it would make sense to use this system.

I have posted the proposal along with some alternatives in Template_talk:Infobox_company#industry so some comments or suggestions there would be appreciated. I don't want to simply edit the guidance and dictate something without a consensus. Scottonsocks (talk) 16:30, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Disputed article split regarding Psygnosis/SCE Studio Liverpool

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:SCE Studio Liverpool#Split of Psygnosis. -- Trevj (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Disputed WP:TARGET regarding Psygnosis/SCE Studio Liverpool

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:SCE Studio Liverpool#Targeted redirect from Psygnosis to 'Psygnosis (1984-1993)' section. -- Trevj (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

split Requested articles Biz & Org

Hi folks. I'm suggesting splitting the current Requested articles /Businesses and organizations page into 2 pages: /Companies (for profit) and /Organizations (non-profit). Discussion here. Thanks. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 10:59, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Quick question

Is there a process for requesting an assessment of company articles you've contributed to for b-class and below?

I would be interested in seeing how someone would score some of my recent works, but without necessarily going through the GA process.

User:King4057 (COI Disclosure on User Page) 03:54, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Requested articles about companies

Companies
Companies

Welcome to the Requested articles list for Companies. This list is for requests for new articles about notable for-profit companies, businesses & corporations, no matter where based, whether public or private, existing or merged or liquidated.

All requests must contain RELIABLE, INDEPENDENT, THIRD PARTY SOURCES. Those without will be removed. (Note: press releases, the company's website, social media sites, and blogs are NOT reliable, independent sources.)

Please add requests to the appropriate area:


This list is only for requests about for-profit companies.

Find this page confusing? Just use this link to ask for help on your talk page; a volunteer will visit you there shortly!


Click a letter in the above box to view the requests. This page was too large and has been divided.


As part of the new WikiProject Requested articles, I'm helping with cleanup of the Companies request list. Besides the usual cleanup tasks, I also created a /Companies/Workspace as a place for prep and discussion of possible stubs. Your comments on the proposed stubs, and the new WikiProject, are most welcome. Thanks. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 22:03, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

It looks encouraging, and it's a refreshing development for WP:Companies. I'll try and make it a point to contribute myself every now and then, though I do worry about the stubs eventually becoming the target of AfDs.—Biosketch (talk) 18:33, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Indeed a valid worry point. So it's best if there are multiple editors working/reviewing on the stubs to reach a consensus on Create/Re-List/Decline. Also we can suggest a basic 3 sentence format for company stubs:
  1. What does the company do?
  2. When was the company established?
  3. Where is the company located? (or where is the main HQ?)
Cheers. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 12:58, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Discussion about infobox

Hey everyone! I've initiated a proposal to bring back the "slogan" field of the company infobox. You can view the discussion at Template talk:Infobox company#Reintroducing the slogan field. Please share your thoughts on the matter. Thank you! CaseyPenk (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Active project?

The project is tagged semi active. What say you, shall we remove this tag? are there enough people paying attention as of 2012 to qualify it as active? There is a new surge of interest here.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Agreed, we're an active project again. Tag removed. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 09:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

A new section on operations for BP article

A short introduction, since I have not been to this page before: I'm an employee of BP, looking to improve the BP article in line with Wikipedia's guidelines and goals. I've come here to ask if editors on this WikiProject would be interested to review a draft section that I've written.

In discussions on the BP Talk page and other forums, editors mentioned that the Operations section is lacking full details of the company's present scope of operations. As I've explained on the article's Talk page, to start helping to improve the section, I would like to offer for review a new subsection providing an overview of all of BP's operations.

The section is in a subpage of my user page: User:Arturo at BP/Overview of operations

Editors are welcome to read through and make any changes needed. It would be best if comments on the draft be made on the article's Talk page so that all discussion about improving BP's article stays in the same place. Thanks. Arturo at BP (talk) 20:41, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment at Ya Kun Kaya Toast's ongoing peer review!

Fellow Wikipedians, I humbly present my latest contribution to this project, an article about Ya Kun Kaya Toast, a Singapore-based food business! All members of this WikiProject are invited to support the quest to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia by commenting at this article's ongoing peer review to help it achieve GA status! May you enjoy reviewing this short, but interesting, article, as much as I enjoyed writing it! Thanks! 谢谢！Terima kasih! நன்றி! --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 05:33, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Storyland

Template:Storyland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 04:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikiproject Companies Template

The front page of the Wikiproject has a warning about COI that encourages COIs to read WP:BFAQ. I was wondering if some kind of similar (but shorter) warning should be added to Template:WikiProject Companies, so that any company that views the Talk page of their article can see a prominent link to information on how they should or shouldn't behave.

Something like "Editors with a financial conflict of interest with the company are encouraged to suggest improvements on the Talk page using request edits following these instructions." (once the instructions are polished more and find a better home) User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 21:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of RSD S.A.

The article RSD S.A. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:NOTABILITY; written in a promotional manner

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 76.65.128.252 (talk) 11:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

RfC on BP content dispute

There is currently a Request for Comment on a content dispute at the BP article. The dispute concerns whether the environmental record should by mentioned in the lede. As this topic falls under the WikiProject Companies' area of expertise, you may want to add it to your alerts section. Thanks! 203.27.72.5 (talk) 02:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed revision of PSB article

I realize that this WikiProject is not terribly active, however I'm proposing a rewrite for an article that is currently listed as being under the purview of it and (presently) no others: Penn, Schoen & Berland. I've written a new draft on behalf of the company, intending to replace the inaccurate, spotty, thinly-sourced current version with a more comprehensive, higher quality, well-verified replacement. If anyone is watching this page and cares to weigh in, my request on the article's Talk page is here, and my proposed replacement version is in my userspace here. Thanks, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 20:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Kool Smiles and NCDR LLC

Hi! From the reliable sources I'm having difficulty in determining whether Kool Smiles and NCDR LLC (currently that redirects to Kool Smiles) are the same company, or if they are separate. There seem to be some serious source conflicts WhisperToMe (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

  • "NCDR's principal client is Kool Smiles"[1]
  • "NCDR LLC, which manages 130 Kool Smiles clinics" [2]
  • "NCDR’s principal client is Kool Smiles"[3]
  • "NCDR LLC, doing business as Kool Smiles,"[4]
  • "Kool Smiles has a company called NCDR LLC that hires the dentists, finds new locations, owns the offices and equipment and manages the employees."[5]
That is very confusing.
It does seem like something that might be best investigated directly from the company[6]

The private-equity firm invests in Kool Smiles’ management partner, NCDR, LLC. NCDR in turn partners with Kool Smiles to provide management and business support services such as HR, facility maintenance, IT and customer service support.

It sounds almost like a franchise, where Kool Smiles is a brand name, but NCDR sets up everything for dentists wanting to start their own practice under Kool Smiles brand. Corporate 12:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Editing @radical.media article

Hello, I'm currently trying to revise the @radical.media page to better conform to Wikipedia standards. I would like to completely resolve the neutrality, reference, and cleanup issues associated with the page and would welcome any suggestions on how to improve the article. Thank you!

I provided some bulleted feedback on the article Talk page. Almost everything in the current article is promotional and can be condensed into a few paragraphs. Meanwhile, the information that is most important to us as an encyclopedia - like History - is missing. I've given you some thoughts on how the article should be structured, with only a couple paragraphs dedicated to the companies services, a couple to awards and a couple to notable works. Corporate 13:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Of interest to those who participate in this wikiproject is a discussion on the Village Pump. Input from those who may participate with this Wikiproject is encouraged. --Robert Horning (talk) 23:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Appreciate your effort at neutrality, but the WikiProject members should be aware that the proposal under discussion would change the lead sentence in thousands of public company articles. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

RFC regarding ticker symbols in article leads

Hi. I've started an RFC regarding ticker symbols in article leads: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ticker symbols in article leads. Please weigh in! --MZMcBride (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and TNEB Limited

There is an ongoing dispute if the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and TNEB Limited should be one or two articles. The proponent of separate articles says that they are different entities and therefore should have have different articles. Proponents of merged article say that even if they may be legally different entities, TNEB Limited is a successor of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board which took over Tamil Nadu Electricity Board employees and obligations and restructuring of the company alone is not a reason to create a separate article if the article duplicates information already provided in another article. The TNEB Limited provides mainly information about the restructuring of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. Therefore, these articles were merged on 22 May 2012. Afterward, there merger was undone several times by now blocked user and his/her sockpuppets. The latest re-creation of TNEB Limited was done by new user on 24 November. The merged version is here and restored article is TNEB Limited. This is little bit messy as there has been recently a number of copy-paste moves but hopefully the situation is understandable. Your comments are appreciated. Beagel (talk) 05:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Poundland

Poundland, an article that your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 12:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Revisions to Mindjet article

In recent weeks, I've been work on behalf of the company Mindjet to update their article. The article itself is relatively new, dating from earlier this year, and so the changes are fairly minor, despite a few big changes at the company. I posted a request for an editor to review the article on its talk page, which details my revisions.

Given my COI on this request, I was hoping that someone here at WP:Companies might be able to review my changes and, if appropriate, move them over into the mainspace. If you have any feedback or concerns, please feel free to leave me a message here, over at Talk:Mindjet, or at User_Talk:ChrisPond. Thanks! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 16:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Done ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 22:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Deutsche Telekom vs. Telecom France - which one is "largest in Europe"?

Deutsche Telekom (DTAG) is stated to be the second largest Tc company in Europe, following France Télécom (FT). However, in german WP, DTAG is stated largest Tc company in Europe, FT only "largest in France".

Numbers for 2011:

  • France Télécom: Revenue: €45.27 billion, Operating income: €7.948 billion, Profit: €3.895 billion, Total assets: €96.08 billion
  • Deutsche Telekom: Revenue: €58.65 billion, Operating income: €5.586 billion, Profit: €557 million, Total assets: €122.54 billion

Which of these numbers are relevant for filing the company as "largest in Europe"? --Jesus Presley (talk) 02:40, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Neither. The trouble is that you could also claim Vodafone is bigger than France Telecom because its revenue is £46bn (€57bn). Such peacock claims are meaningless, they poison the encyclopaedia and are best removed. --Biker Biker (talk) 08:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
"Largest" is always problematic; business entities often compare revenues, asserts, market cap, customers served, etc, but the term largest is meaningless with a qualifier. As Mr. Biker notes, even with qualifiers, it usually comes off as non-notable puffery. Kuru (talk) 14:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I added "according to annual revenue" to the (updated) claims. Have both pages on my watchlist and I consider to rephrase them. However, I'd like to keep in the fact that both companies are the biggest players on the european market. Suggestions for that? --Jesus Presley (talk) 14:51, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
I share Kuru's concerns about the word "biggest". Keep claims specific; "Business X has the largest turnover, business Y has the largest market cap, ..." bobrayner (talk) 12:18, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Brands

WikiProject Brands is a new WikiProject that has gone live. Feel free to check it out! Northamerica1000(talk) 11:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment

There is a request for comment concerning the BP article. Your input is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Cleantech Group

The Cleantech Group article needs attention from people who are good at turning what an anonymous feedback-leaver described as "a self-promoting puff piece that reads like a sales brochure". I've tagged it with {{advert}} but it needs more attention than I have time to give it. Thryduulf (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Ethiopian Airlines

Ethiopian Airlines, an article that your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 12:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

EnergyAustralia

There is a proposal concerning EnergyAustralia and TRUenergy articles. Your opinion is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Airbus environmental content

There is information available on Airbus and the environment that could update current information provided on the main Airbus page. I’d be very grateful if someone could look at this and update it appropriately. I’ve provided the details in the Talk page of the article, but don’t think it would be appropriate for me to edit the article directly as I work for Airbus.

(Jackh2012 (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC))

Replied on article talkpage. bobrayner (talk) 14:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:SAIC (company)

Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:SAIC (company)#Proposed move .28inc..29, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks, Tyrol5 [Talk] 04:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion - Infobox Acquisitions and Mergers

Has it been suggested that an infobox be created which would organize information about the acquisitions and mergers of a current company? I think this would be useful in both the context of specific articles (for instance, the acquisition of Alcatel by Lucent is relegated to the last paragraph of History and is tough to see as a highlight of the company's history) and as an addition to data available via Dbpedia. Thanks for your thoughts on this. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Company name inclusion for Backend as a service article

Last October, I worked with Kinvey, a backend-as-a-service (BaaS) provider, to update the Backend as a service article. The article previously existed, but was quite poor. My changes were vetted by volunteer editors, and moved into the mainspace.

Following this, anonymous editors added two relatively minor BaaS providers to the list of providers in the article. This generated a bit of discussion on Talk:Backend as a service about how best to handle the inclusion of specific providers by name, although no consensus was reached. In the latest iteration of the page, one of these volunteer editors decided the simplest thing would be to remove all mention of BaaS providers from the article.

While I understand that Wikipedia articles like this can be attractive for self-promotional editors, and I acknowledge that my own relationship with Kinvey muddies the water a bit, I do think that a useful encyclopedia article should name the major providers, so long as they are verified by reliable, third-party sources. The Cloud computing article does this, for example. On the BaaS Talk page I suggested articles by three tech industry observers, along with proposed text accurately describing the market of BaaS providers.

Wikipedia's guidelines about including sources seems to me to be all we need here—unsourced claims should be removed, sourced claims should be allowed to stay.

I'm posting this here, as well as to WP:Paid editor help, in an effort to get others' thoughts about this. Please feel free to join the discussion over at Talk:Backend as a service. Thanks! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 15:41, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this here. In my opinion, a list of providers would be quite appropriate along the lines you've noted ... sourced and verified. There are many many lists here that have very poor sourcing. If we can help to encourage list-item sourcing through individual entry sourcing, all the better. Also, once individual entry sourcing is established, this provides a ready metric for refusing inclusion of unsourced list content. The problem, though, becomes one of verifiability versus self-verification. Many people accept self-published material for 'fact' support; it would be easy for people to say "why can't we have self-published material sourcing inclusion in a list" as this is a simple 'fact'. I don't think this problem has been adequately resolved. Thus, in principle I support the inclusion of a sourced list, in practice, the quality of the sources emerging from self-promotional parties would be both within the scope of acceptance and difficult to counter. Hope some others can weigh in on this matter. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ceyockey, Thanks so much for taking the time to reply to this and share your thoughts. I agree that this is something of a larger issue and affects many articles. And it's not necessarily easy to decide what to do, either! I'm wondering if you might be willing to weigh in on the discussion over at Talk:Backend as a service and share your thoughts there. Maybe we can treat this BaaS article as a kind of "test case" for thinking about how to handle these situations, so that we have some kind of rough guide in the future? Looking forward to your input! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 16:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Jaguar

I've just initiated an RfC at the Talk:Jaguar Cars page regarding a recent legal name swap. There have been several days of discussion before this point, so outside input would be very helpful, I think, in an eventual path forward. Given the relevance of that discussion to this WikiProject, if you have a moment, please consider taking a look and sharing any advice you might be able to offer. Thanks! user:j (talk) 19:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Using bot for replacing full stop (.) with comma (,) to separate thousands at the number of employees field of the company infoboxes

There is a discussion about using bot for replacing full stop (.) with comma (,) to separate thousands at the number of employees field of the company infoboxes. Your comments are appreciated. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 18:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I would appreciate if my colleagues here could take a look at the message I left at Template talk:Finance links#Hoover's ID field and propose a way of addressing an issue I raised there relating to an outdated field.—Biosketch (talk) 20:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Article assessment request

Could someone please assess KMGi Group for Start or "C" class? It is currently rated a "Stub" but was recently expanded. Thank you. Cla68 (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done
Looks okay; assessed as C-Class.—Biosketch (talk) 21:43, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

UFB Direct (company)

Dear business experts:

Can you please take a look at this page UFB Direct (company)? I have been reviewing new articles, but I don't know enough about business to know if this is a legitimate separate company, or whether it should be part of the BofI Federal Bank (company) article. I did a little research and put it on the talk page. —Anne Delong (talk) 21:30, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Tool for overview of edits associated with companies

Yesterday I pushed our analysis of Wikipedia edits associated with companies on the web it is available from:

http://rb.imm.dtu.dk/base/

See for example:

http://rb.imm.dtu.dk/base/c/Danske%20Bank

We do sentiment analysis of pages related to a set of major companies to determine positive and negative contributions. The present output lists sentences from "diffs" with sentiment, users contributing the most sentiment (either negative or positive), the sequential collaboration network color-coded according to sentiment, and a temporal graph showing the evolution of sentiment. For some of the companies I aggregate the subpages associated with the companies, e.g., product pages or "history of...". I am continuously collecting data, however, the analyssi is not yet set up to update automatically.

Please let me hear if this is useful or you have any suggestions. — fnielsen (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Why is Scientology in that list?—Biosketch (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

neutrality of McGraw-Hill article

Hi! I am new to Wikipedia, so please bear with me. I'm having a hard time finding this statement in the McGraw-Hill article to be free of bias: "No Child Left Behind was highly profitable for McGraw-Hill and a delusion held by political enemies of President Bush is that federal education policy was influenced by the familiar relationship.[20]" The source that is linked to in this case is a blog entry that includes an opinion piece that was published in a newspaper that argues that federal education policy was indeed influenced by the relationship between the Bush family and McGraw-Hill. I feel this is an off-handed way of trying to insult others rather than trying to inform the reader of a controversy. How should I edit this? Thanks! NoisyMia (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment

There is a request for comment how much weight should be given to the Clean Water Act Trial in the BP article. Your input is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 08:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for comments concerning the year Lufthansa was founded in

There is an ongoing dispute over the founding date of Lufthansa. See RFC-section at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Germany#Request_for_comments_concerning_the_year_Lufthansa_was_founded_in to add your comments. GermanJoe (talk) 08:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Interac (Japan)

Regarding Interac_(Japan) KeroroGunso (talk · contribs) & Laevatienn (talk · contribs) have made arguments on the talk page about the nature of the article, as it is mostly made up of union-related-labor-dispute content that echos the types found on Tozen, General_Union and Unfair_Labor_Practice_(Japan). The result here is a lack of depth or breadth in dealing with Interac as a company, which lowers its quality score in WP:Japan and WP:EDUCATION. Looking at the edit history seems to be a lot of work by Ckatz (talk · contribs), Statisticalregression (talk · contribs),Nihonjoe (talk · contribs) and others. KeroroGunso, Laevatienn, and myself recognize the NPOV issues in the article as it is made up of union-related-labor-dispute content. Discussion about this has been made on the Talk page, but no response has come from anyone with a different opinion. Attempts to remove this reverted time after time, and I believe that it would be more appropriate for a reference to be made to the union-related-labor-dispute content and have that content on the pages of the relevant parties or topics, such as Tozen, General_Union and Unfair_Labor_Practice_(Japan). What is needed from an editor here is for someone to have an unbiased look at what is related to the company as an organization, and what is related to the union-related-labor-dispute(S). Advice on how to make the page stronger as for company-related content to move it more toward NPOV, and advice on how to realign or move union-related-labor-dispute content to their appropriate areas or pages.Taurus669 (talk) 00:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Taurus669 (talk) 00:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

games

games — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.79.67.200 (talk) 23:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for additional comments

There is a merger proposal that UAL Corporation be merged into United Continental Holdings. (Discussion>>>HERE<<<): The articles suggest that they are the same company, just renamed after the merger. Feedback is greatly appreciated! Thank you. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Refco and its former boss

An amiable inquiry on my user talk page led me to the article on one Phillip R. Bennett, previously the head of a company called Refco. The article on Bennett (a living person) alleged that he pled guilty to various charges, and was imprisoned for these, after the date of the sole reference provided for the whole article. And that was how the article had remained for years. Thinking of "BLP" policy, I zapped this material.

But the material that I zapped: is it verifiable? Even the quickest glance in a search engine reveals that yes it is. So deleting it was rather myopic. (Or, less charitably, stupid.) After all, the deleted material just needed to be sourced, and perhaps amended and updated in places. Why didn't I do that? Because I know squat about this kind of subject: bookkeeping (-losing), low finance, corporate law. I imagine that you people here do know something about this kind of subject, and I therefore invite you to help rebuild the article on Bennett. -- Hoary (talk) 00:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

New article for review

Hi, I've researched and written a draft article for Purple Strategies, a communications firm that currently does not have a Wikipedia article. I am confident that this company meets notability guidelines, however because I have created this article on behalf of, and with input from, Purple Strategies I am looking for editors to review what I have prepared and move the article live for me if it is ready. I've submitted it to AfC, but due to the backlog there, I was wondering if anyone from this WikiProject would be willing to take a look?

If you're interested in reviewing the article, the AfC entry is here: Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Purple_Strategies. Please feel free to make adjustments to the draft as you see necessary. If you have any questions or comments please let me know and I'll do my best to respond to you quickly. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done The article has been reviewed and taken live. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 19:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Winton Capital Management

Greetings to anyone who is watching this page. I am looking for help with a request I posted to the Winton Capital Management Talk page earlier this week. I have prepared this request as a paid consultant to Winton, so I will not be editing this page myself. If you are interested in looking at the request and helping me with these updates, my request can be found on the article's Talk page. I'm happy to answer any questions about my request. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 20:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Dual-listed funds

We can read "There are also two dual listed funds quoted both on the London Stock Exchange and the Stock Exchange of Mauritius." IS it possible to know their name or ticker? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.236.230.191 (talk) 19:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Which office is the primary headquarters of Claire's?

Hi! Regarding Claire's secondary newspaper sources seem to dispute which office (Florida or Illinois) are the headquarters for Claire's. Some sources (mainly those from Florida) say it is "based" in Pembroke Pines, Florida. Others (mainly those from Illinois) say it is "based" in Hoffman Estates, Illinois.

As for the company itself:

  • Contact Us IR Page lists, after "headquarters" its "Florida Office" and then its "Illinois Office"
  • FAQ says investor relations and customer service are based out of Florida while buying, marketing and distribution offices are in Hoffman Estates
  • According to this Chicago Tribune article, since 1973, and as of 1997, then-CEO Schaeffer had his offices in Florida but commuted to Illinois which was the "company's main facility and distribution center"
  • In 1998 this Daily Herald article said "Pembroke Pines, Fla.-based Claire's owns several retail chains that sell accessories and clothes for teenagers. Claire's has Hoffman Estates operations."
  • But a Wikipedian pointed said that today, if one searches for the top officials listed here on LinkedIn they are based in the Chicago area.

WhisperToMe (talk) 05:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I found an SEC form:

WhisperToMe (talk) 05:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

When I searched EDGAR I got a listing here https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Claire%27s&owner=exclude&action=getcompany which identifies "Claire's Boutiques, Inc." "Claire's Canada Corp." and "Claire's Puerto Rico Corp." as being based in Florida and "Claire's Inc. SIC: 5600 - RETAIL-APPAREL & ACCESSORY STORES" as being based in Illinois.

After going through some SEC filings, in Talk:Claire's I documented that originally "Claire's Stores, Inc." listed Pembroke Pines as its "principal executive offices" until at least 2008. It became a subsidiary to "Claire's, Inc." and, while I haven't yet located old SEC filings of "Claire's, Inc." - 2013 filings of "Claire's, Inc." and "Claire's Stores, Inc." list Hoffman Estates as the "principal executive offices". WhisperToMe (talk) 05:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Request for 'below' parameter in Template:Infobox company

Any chance someone could please enable the 'below' parameter in the Template:Infobox company template? My specific use case is that I would like to insert an image in the bottom of an infobox (see User:Anders_Feder/sandbox/CSinfobox).--Anders Feder (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Company formed in 1866, incorporated in December 1856?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Telegraph_Company

Maybe the article is mixed with another company: The Anglo-American Telegraph Company? For me it seems Atlantic Telegraph Company was formed in 1856 or something, not 1866. -- 176.198.119.184 (talk) 19:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Are these companies?

Do these belong in the project?

--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 21:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Request for Re-Assesment

Hello, I'm not sure where this belongs but I'm interested in having the article The Trump Organization re-assessed for importance since it is currently listed as a stub. Since I am not a member of the project I do not feel comfortable doing it myself if that even is the correct way that Company articles are assessed. If there is a better place to ask for this can someone please point me in that direction? ThanksTeeVeeed (talk) 21:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Requesting help with Accenture article

Hello, I'm currently working on behalf of Accenture to improve their Wikipedia article, which suffers from a number of inaccuracies that I'm hoping to see corrected. Because of my financial COI, I won't make any edits to the article myself. Instead, I've posted a note at Talk:Accenture, detailing some of the corrections I think need to be made. If someone from here has time to take a look and, if my recommendations look okay, implement the changes, I'd appreciate it! Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 14:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Use of former official name

There is a discussion how the name 'British Petroleum' should be referred in the BP article. Your comments are welcome. Beagel (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification of nomination for deletion of Sunrise Aviation

This is to inform the members of this Wikiproject, within the scope of which this article falls, that this article has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunrise Aviation. - Ahunt (talk) 22:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Article deletion User:Sshaked/Community of Knowledge

Hello. This English translation of an article (regarding a non-profit Internet platform) was deleted for sounding too promotion-like. I have made some changes for it to be more fluent and changed the overall tone (that was probably not optimal for Wikipedia in the original translation). Do you have anymore suggestion regarding formulation, phrasing, or content? --Sshaked (talk) 06:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshaked (talk • contribs) 12:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Adding an infobox to Education Management Corporation

Hello, anyone watching this page. I'm looking for help adding the {{infobox company}} template to the Education Management Corporation article. At present, it lacks any sort of infobox, so I have prepared one and placed it on the Talk page for other editors to review. I have not added it to the article myself because I am working as a paid consultant to the company, and with this financial COI feel that it is best for other editors to review what I have prepared.

In addition, I've prepared a suggested revision for the introduction of article; the current intro has a few POV issues and is missing some information—for example, the names of the schools the company operates. If you have time to help with either of these two issues, the message I left on the Talk page contains both my suggestions and the prepared markup for editors to consider. If you have any questions or comments, I'll be watching the article's Talk page for replies. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 19:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

This has been  Done. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 18:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

requesting help at WinCo Foods

there is some dispute at this page. most recently the sticking points are about the meanings of "privately held" versus "employee-owned". there is something of a WP:BATTLE mentality as well. more eyes would be appreciated. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 19:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

RfC for Winco Foods on private vs employee owned; and lists of events in company history

There is a current RfC on WinCo Foods . Cantaloupe2 (talk) 03:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Liberty Global page needs update (or preferably, regular updates)

Liberty Global plc is an international telecommunications and television company. It was formed in 2005 by the merger of the international arm of Liberty Media and UGC (UnitedGlobalCom), and is the largest broadband provider outside of the United States. As of June 30, 2013, it had an annual revenue of $17 billion, 36,000 employees in 14 countries, including 12 in Europe. Its cable services pass 47 million homes, with 24 million customers or 48 million RGUs (video, internet, and voice subscribers)[3] On June 7 , 2013, Liberty Global completed the acquisition of British cable group Virgin Media for $24 billion.[4][5] In January 2013, Liberty Global raised its stake in Mechelen, Belgium-based Telenet from 50.2% to 58%.[9] Liberty Global is headquartered in London, with offices in Amsterdam and in Englewood, ColoradoJoramkanner (talk) 08:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Another new company article for review - Ipanema Technologies

UPDATE: I have now made the Ipanema page live as a month had passed since posting the changes on the Talk page. I am happy to discuss any concerns or adjustments. The page can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipanema_Technologies.

DianneDianneDianne (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I've put a draft revision of the Wikipedia page for Ipanema Technologies under their 'Talk' section. Ipanema's existing page is over three years old and is very out of date. This makes a lot of the information now factually inaccurate.

The changes I have made are neutral and extensively externally sourced.

I've acknolwedged my conflict of interest, as I am part of a media company working for Ipanema. I've done this both in the edits and on my own Talk page. I would appreciate if you were to visit the page and please let me know if it's appropriate.

The link to Ipanema Technologies is here. My revisions are on the Talk page.

DianneDianneDianne (talk) 11:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

GAR

Cathay Pacific, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Dana boomer (talk) 14:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

SpaceHub Southeast

I converted SpaceHub Southeast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) from Indian English to American English, because this is an American company based out of Atlanta, Georgia. If you think that MOS:RETAIN is more important than MOS:TIES, feel free to revert me. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 09:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Help with Verizon Communications?

Hello, my name is Bob, and I work for Verizon Communications (you can read my full conflict of interest disclosure here). I recently posted a message on Talk:Verizon, looking for an editor or two to help make some improvements to the article in the way of correcting and updating information. Is there someone from this project that might be able to help out? Thanks so much, VZBob (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

== 実印賢明な購入しよう 

==

できることなら、フォントの選択の可能性。その辺の長さ1センチメートルの正方形ボックスに収激文途眯预螑櫥伽胜に夭摹⑷毡局辘沃晔饯猡狻ⅳ沥悚螭仁虑坝∮挨胜嗓谓鹑跈C関に使用される。一方、水牛素材彫刻のほか、個人印は登録が必要。偽造防止に役立つ書体は、法人名と共に処理ぐらい共通の場所を決めるような獣も問瞍摔胜盲郡郅Δいい琛? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.68.105.244 (talk) 08:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Millenniata

I think that this company may be non-notable but their technology is, which would change (I believe) the scope over to WikiProject Technology. Thoughts? —Hobart (talk) 02:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

That sounds reasonable to me. Also, if the technology is notable but the company isn't, it might be a good idea to rename the article and tweak the wording accordingly. bobrayner (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Michiana Health Information Network

Is this notable? I was going to AfD it but was unsure. --S.G.(GH) ping! 10:51, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Risk Control Limited

Hello business people! This article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Risk Control Limited hasn't been edited for some time and will soon be deleted. Is it worth saving? It appears to have a lot of references. —Anne Delong (talk) 18:34, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

It's gone now... —Anne Delong (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/G13 rescue

A lot of partially completed articles about companies (and other topics) are being deleted at Wikiproject Articles for creation because they haven't been edited for over six months. If you wish to peruse the titles and see if any are worth saving, you can find them listed at the link above. When you get to the page, just click on the really big number (that's how many there are). You will see the ones that will likely be deleted today. If you see one worth saving, just start editing it and that will take it off the list. Thanks! —Anne Delong (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

IBM & Wikipedia

I was hoping to find an IBM wikiproject, but I guess this will have to do in place, The following is an article about IBM & Wikipedia: http://wikipediocracy.com/2014/02/09/elementary-my-dear-watson/ I have not had a chance to look at it carefully, but it looks interesting. XOttawahitech (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Quill.com names new president + other changes

Hi! I am hoping someone can help me update information on the Quill.com page. While I do work for the company so I understand the conflict of interest, but I do hope there is information we can update.

Quill.com recently named a new president to replacing Mike Patriarca. The new president of the company is Sergio Pereira. Here is the press release: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20131008006865/en/Quill.com-Names-Sergio-Pereira-President

The company has been rapidly expanding its assortment to include more than office supplies (products section should really be business products).

Finally, the company is not considered a mail order company anymore. As the article states today, over 70% of Quill's sales are conducted online. Therefore, Quill should be considered a "business products e-tailer for small and medium sized business" instead of a mail order company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuhn115 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Writing an article on an international company called Koobo LLC.

Hello everyone! I'm currently a temporary intern in Xiamen China at a company called Kooboo. I'm trying to develop a Wikipedia page on them. Nothing too special other than the basics. I just started working on this article only two days ago and am very, slowly getting used to some of the complicated rules and procedures that go with editing Wikipedia. I would like the page to look somewhat professional but nothing fancy. The company is very popular and has been used in large companies like T-Mobile, Grolsh, e.on, WNL, and UPC. The problem I'm having is not being able to find references. Kooboo makes a product called KoobooCMS and basically its used in the creation of user friendly websites and applications. So when I want to prove that T-Mobile used this program to create their website, it is almost impossible. How can I reference something like this! Here is a link to the website. [7] Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Normad007 (talk • contribs) 07:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Article request - Chrysler Capital

I would like to request the creation of an article on auto finance provider Chrysler Capital. The request is located here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics/Companies#Cf-Ci

I work for Santander Consumer USA and Chrysler Capital is a joint venture between Santander Consumer USA and Chrysler Group LLC, providing financing to customers and dealers across the US for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, RAM, FIAT and SRT vehicles, plus financing for Mopar vehicle customization as part of this. Rlooker (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Sources on the most powerful global companies

These sources may be useful in sourcing which companies have the most power in the world:

WhisperToMe (talk) 08:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

T.B.D. Licenses O.O.E.C.P. Records revisions lowering decibal on toxcicity.SPOKANE WASH.

The slightest difference in labeling the bd syrynge co-op. is upscaling its insurance...rest assured "with the TBD label the innertangentable comprise is...simplified..!This and finality on a sancuary the occult has since LIVEA Augustas Ceasar,..and Morgan 'mordred Lefatey....and now Cherish 'morbid'annepfaff Rafters. successfully alit are the tenders seclusive to the stone quarries output projection and the key port a.l. to by which the expanse of stone intrest will accemnenementalise idiuoms and other sanctuary style perveyancers.

i have been a trans gender mistress for all of my prepared life. noewer covenant typicils defrighten my prose as natural abilities lyne promise.- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.97.121.80 (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

[1]

The slightest difference in labeling the bd syrynge co-op. is upscaling its insurance...rest assured "with the TBD label the innertangentable comprise is...simplified..!This and finality on a sancuary the occult has since LIVEA Augustas Ceasar,..and Morgan 'mordred Lefatey....and now Cherish 'morbid'annepfaff Rafters. successfully alit are the tenders seclusive to the stone quarries output projection and the key port a.l. to by which the expanse of stone intrest will accemnenementalise idiuoms and other sanctuary style perveyancers.

i have been a trans gender mistress for all of my prepared life. noewer covenant typicils defrighten my prose as natural abilities lyne promise.- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.97.121.80 (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Help with Page

Hi, I’m Paul from Broadridge Financial Solutions. I had noticed the template at the top of the article that says its current version looks like an ad. I’d like to know how I can help. I can make suggestions here or maybe try to do a suggested draft on my userpage.

I know that there is a conflict of interest here, so I want to do this carefully. Let me know next steps. Thanks. Paulkaplannyc (talk) 22:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)broad

Paulkaplannyc (talk) 22:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Paul Kaplan

Assessments?

Please see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies/Assessment. Thanks, XOttawahitech (talk) 04:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

RfC: Modelzone

I have been working on the Modelzone page for a while, and believe that the subject is now settled enough and the article sufficient for further review. I prefer not to up-rate articles that I have worked on myself, so am looking for and would appreciate independent comment on the article in order to get it to B-class and potentially further. To clarify on conflict of interests: I am not a current or former employee of the company, but my signficant other and several of our friends are. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Assessed as B-class (just a quick assessment, not a WP:Peer review). -- Ϫ 17:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

New York Times discusses US government fines of companies

WhisperToMe (talk) 07:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

New Tea Company named The Tea Company needs a page on Wikipedia

Dear editors,

I am the founder of The Tea Company Inc. I wanted to create a page for my company but I'm afraid it will be considered a conflict of interest if I create the article myself. I've seen so many company articles, some Fortune 500 and some very small ones, I thought mine could also have its place, provided it was done properly.

I am aware of the informational character of Wikipedia and I'm not trying to directly promote my products here as it's not the place. Simply, I would like to have my company described in Wikipedia in a neutral, informative fashion.

I would see in the article the historical data, the types of teas it offers with a link to each tea category (green tea, black tea, oolong, pu-erh, etc), links to the history of tea, health benefits of tea, and so on. And I'm not going to lie, I would also LOVE having an external link to my website.

I'm looking for one or several authors to help with this project.

Your help will be greatly appreciated!

Thank you in advance,

Ben at The Tea Company (talk) 05:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Ben at The Tea Company

At a quick glace, it's fairly hard to find any reliable sources that could be used to create an article about your business. There are several other companies that share that name which do not appear to be yours, which could be complicating things. Could you provide any third party sources which could be used to build an article which are specific to your entity? Kuru (talk) 12:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Company articles

FYI - I have started a discussion about company articles on Jimbo's Talk page here. CorporateM (Talk) 06:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

VT Group

The VT Group article concerns a British company which was taken over by Babcock International Group in 2010. An IP and now a new user has been making apparently well-intentioned though possibly conflicted edits to the article regarding an American company of the same name. From their identical logos there would appear to be some connection betweent the two companies (the American arm of the previous entity continuing under the same name in that country?) but this is left muddled by the new users edits: the history of the historical company rightly left intact but with a lede which explains a different company now exists with that name and the infobox filled with details of the new co. rather than the one the article is about. There is no explanation as to how the companies are or were connected or if the same name and logo is a coincidence (unlikely). It made for a confusing read so I reverted. Does anyone know what the connection is or have a view on how to cover it in that or a separate article? Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

This looks like a legitimate change. An apparent connection between the 2 companies is described at http://www.marketwatch.com/story/babcock-intl-to-sell-vt-services-to-vt-holdings-2012-05-14 The same editor made another, less muddled, attempt, but the text added reads like a press release. (Who writes "delivers solutions" except PRs?). Let's restore the infobox changes and refs, but rewrite the text. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 16:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
YesY Done Looks like things are in better shape, to the best of my ability, though naturally more could be written about the current operations, and the history could be summarized in the lede more thoroughly than I did. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 17:20, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. Mathias0879 (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AOL Ventures

Dear company experts: Here is an old draft which was created but never submitted at Afc, and now is about to be deleted as a stale draft. I don't know much about business. Is this an article that should be kept? —Anne Delong (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Archived some threads

I've archived some inactive threads to subsections which were notifications about discussions that have since been closed. — Cirt (talk) 17:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to User Study

Would you be interested in participating in a user study? We are a team at University of Washington studying methods for finding collaborators within a Wikipedia community. We are looking for volunteers to evaluate a new visualization tool. All you need to do is to prepare for your laptop/desktop, web camera, and speaker for video communication with Google Hangout. We will provide you with a Amazon gift card in appreciation of your time and participation. For more information about this study, please visit our wiki page (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Finding_a_Collaborator). If you would like to participate in our user study, please send me a message at Wkmaster (talk) 06:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC).

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

"Plymouth"

The usage of Plymouth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is under discussion, see talk:Plymouth -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:35, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Four-paragraph leads -- a WP:RfC on the matter

Hello, everyone. There is a WP:RfC on whether or not the leads of articles should generally be no longer than four paragraphs (refer to WP:Manual of Style/Lead section for the current guideline). As this will affect Wikipedia on a wide scale, including WikiProjects that often deal with article formatting, if the proposed change is implemented, I invite you to the discussion; see here: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#RFC on four paragraph lead. Flyer22 (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Help on article about Accenture

Hello, I'm hoping someone here might be able to help me make some edits to the Accenture article. I'm currently working on behalf of the company to make some improvements to their Wikipedia page. Because of that financial COI, I won't make any edits myself, so I'm looking for volunteer editors to review my suggestions (posted over at Talk:Accenture) and, if they seem appropriate, implement them.

There are a few pieces of information on the page that are out-of-date or incorrect. Some of the suggestions I'm making I previously discussed with volunteer Wikipedia editors, and the information was updated, but since then, the information has been changed and is now inaccurate again. Where relevant, I've linked to these previously discussions.

If someone from this WikiProject is able to take a look and see about making the corrections and updates, I'd appreciate it! Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 20:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

This is now  Done! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 15:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Seeking help for an update to Verizon Communications

Hello, I'm looking for a volunteer editor who might be able to help me with some edits to the Verizon Communications article. I am an employee of Verizon, and so don't make any direct edits myself. However, I've drafted a new "History" section for the article, which I feel does a better job of addressing the companies history in encyclopedic terms. You can find my draft "History" section in my userspace.

I've posted a note over at Talk:Verizon Communications, but as of yet, it doesn't look like an editor has had a chance to take a look at my draft. If anyone here has a chance to look and take my draft live, that would be great. Also, I realize the draft is a bit long, so I'm happy to work through section by section if editors feel that would be easier.

Thanks so much, VZBob (talk) 16:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

This has been done. VZBob (talk) 18:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Ethan Allen (furniture company) page needs an update

Hi, I work for Ethan Allen so I can't edit the company's page so I'm looking for a volunteer editor to correct some information. Currently, the financial information is from 2010 and the most recent reference used in the body of the article is from 2009. I can provide specific corrections if you'd like, but if you'd just like reference materials, that's fine, too. Is the company's annual report considered a verifiable source of basic factual information, such as number and location of facilities, annual revenue, etc.? If so, the company's 2013 annual report is here: http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=81552&p=irol-reports. Please let me know if I'm doing this wrong. Thanks. EA user (talk) 16:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)EA user

By disclosing your affiliation and not making the edits yourself, you are doing it right. Thank you for that. You should list the changes you think should be made on the Ethan Allen talk page. In an ideal world information like you mention would come from secondary sources, but for non-controversial statements of fact, primary sources are better than nothing. Tdslk (talk) 16:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Microsoft FAR

I have nominated Microsoft for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Indrian (talk) 04:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Fact box

Are there any specific requirements for creating a fact box on a company page, other than verifiable data?146.123.143.246 (talk) 23:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

How to prove that information is "inaccurate"?

An editor asked me to look at a proposed article that was written by a company. After the editor posted the article, I added additional information from Reuters sources but the editor removed it saying it was inaccurate.

What is the "proof" to prove something written in Reuters is inaccurate? WhisperToMe (talk) 03:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Looking for community support on a new grant proposal

The Global Economic Map project (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Global_Economic_Map) plans to build a bot that will upload economic/corporate/financial data into Wikidata and systematically display the data in articles such as this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcnabber091/Economy_of_the_United_States. Our goal is to make an article for every country that looks like that one. The economic/corporate/financial data uploaded into Wikidata as part of this project will be usable for Wikipedia articles as well. We are looking for community support and people who want to get more involved with this Wikidata project. We would love to get more involved with WikiProject Finance and hear your input. If you are interested to hear more please send me a message, write an endorsement on the grant page or ask questions below. Thank you Mcnabber091 (talk) 07:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Help with ownership of Companies in info boxes

I edited infoboxes of companies Capital Group Companies owns a percentage in. Then User Owen× ☎ undid all the edits I've made regarding companies that Capital Group Companies has small to majority of ownership in. The user, stated that my edits are disruptive and, there is no point of putting information like that in the articles. Example; for Amcor, in the infobox, I've added that Capital Group Companies has a 9.42% ownership of Amcor. And OwenX undid it, some of my edits he stated as nonsense. Is the user right? Because I edited company infoboxes of other articles regarding what that company has ownership in or who's the "owner" or "parent" of that company, and no other users had a problem with me doing that. Seqqis (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

It looks like you have started to engage with OwenX, who has provided a reason for his/her reversion of your edits. If you disagree with that reasoning, I would recommend continuing your conversation there to see if you two can come to some agreement first. Tdslk (talk) 21:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
OwenX still isn't agreeing to what I'm saying. I would like some help settling the argument with the user. Seqqis (talk) 03:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
You might not get OwenX to agree to what you are saying, no matter how much backing or assistance you have. That's simply human nature. Consider adding the information ... properly sourced and contextually pertinent ... to another part of the article than the infobox. If the reasoning for putting in the infobox is that it then will appear in DBpedia, consider creating an infobox dedicated to ownership reporting where minority ownership would have a home and be available to the linked data community. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:31, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello,
Please note that Grocery store, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by Theo's Little Bot at 01:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Winton Capital Management

Hi there, I'm looking for assistance with an article that falls under the scope of WikiProject Companies and I'm hopeful someone here might be interested in helping. Last week I posted a request on the Winton Capital Management Talk page asking for help with a few changes to the article to update Winton's assets under management and leadership info. I am a paid consultant to Winton and would therefore like to avoid any edits to the article. Instead, I have left a more detailed message on the Talk page explaining the updates needed. If someone from this WikiProject was interested in helping me with these edits it would be most appreciated. I'll be watching the Winton page closely if there are any questions or comments and can respond to editors there. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 13:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done Tdslk (talk) 19:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

User "UserNameUnderConstruction" editing the AdvisorShares page needs to blocked

For the Advisorshares article, this user keeps writing advertorial content and seem to be related to the company. This user seems to be the same person as a previous user who was blocked because the had the user name "AdvisorShares". Before that they didn't use a user name and the ip address traced back to the town in Maryland where AdvisorShares is located. It seems more than likely that this person works for the company, is trying to make their page into a biased free advertisement and is not disclosing this, in violation of Wikipedia's rules and procedures. ETFeditor 17:50, 17 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etfcanadian (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carestream Dental

Dear company experts: I am trying to figure out if this is a notable company. I am not a business expert, and the history provided seems confusing and vague to me. Can someone please look at it and give an opinion about whether the page should be kept and improved, or deleted as a stale draft? Thanks. —Anne Delong (talk) 13:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

I trawled through the sources.
  • Some sources don't actually name Carestream; so they may well support specific content in the article but they're not evidence that Carestream is notable.
  • This page looks like substantial independent coverage of Carestream from a relatively solid source (well, it's more solid than most corporate profiles).
  • This is just a press release.
  • This is hard to gauge; "DPGA insights" sounds impressively solid and independent, but it's just a blog platform, and the content is obviously PR copy written by somebody at Carestream.
I'm not convinced that the business is notable enough. bobrayner (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
bobrayner, thanks for taking the time to check this out. After your comments I decided not to postpone its deletion, so it's gone now. —Anne Delong (talk) 00:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Citing Form 10-K and company annual report

I've been thinking for a while now that a "cite 10-K" template might be useful. However, such reports are sourced from a variety of locations, so providing an EDGAR link, for instance, would not be consistent with current consensus among people who cite 10-K forms. I found a page published by Butler University, though, which relates APA 6th edition citation styles for the form 10-k and the more generic company annual report; see http://libguides.butler.edu/content.php?pid=161391&sid=2042819 for this information. From the examples, one can create a derivative of citation which contains a focused set of parameters and values for some parameters. 

{{Citation
| year     =
| title    =<!-- either "Annual report <<year>>" or "Form 10-K <<year>>"-->
| work =<!--source of the 10-K or annual report-->
| publisher =<!--origin of the 10-K or annual report-->
| page  =<!--or use the rp template-->
| pages =<!--or use the rp template-->
| url =<!-- if available -->
| accessdate  =<!-- optional -->
| format      =<!--used to indicate "PDF", for instance-->
}}

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:13, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Suspicious editors on the Fund.com page

First of all I looked up one the ip addresses (71.178.252.123) on the Fund.com page and the network name was Arrow Funds, one of the companies mentioned in the article. Also, I strongly believe that "Usernameunderconstruction" from the Advisorshares page is the same person as "ETFinvestor" from the fund.com page. It seems like the employees and/or owners of these two companies are having a Wikipedia war. Can anyone with high level permission check if Usernameunderconstruction and ETFinvestor come from the same IP address, making them sock puppets.Donthaveacowman76 (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for assistance

There is a discussions at Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses#Founder regarding whether Russell, the founder of the groups which later incorporated and changed names to the JW name, can reasonably be called the founder of the JWs as well, and, I suppose, if he can, whether there should be some sort of additional text to the effect of his being the founder of the group which later became the JWs. I have a feeling the people here might be among the better editors to respond to this issue of name change and subsequent formal founding of a legal business. John Carter (talk) 22:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles related to LGBT-related companies may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 19:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Snow Business (company) for deletion

[[

File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snow Business (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snow Business (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Gorthian (talk) 07:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Leaflet For Wikiproject Companies At Wikimania 2014

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 16:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

I think List of assets owned by Berkshire Hathaway requires a higher importance level

As noted on its talk page many months (and indeed years) ago now, this article, which lists the assets of the fifth largest company in the world, is not put together very well. Although I did some minor cleanup on it, I do not have the economic background or knowledge to vigorously improve the article. The article should be regarded as being of high importance due to the scale of the company's notability. See the talk page for the issues apparently at hand. (Also, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to bring this up; apologies if I got it wrong.) -- Pingumeister(talk) 19:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata: Economics task force

Wikidata: Economics task force

Mcnabber091 (talk) 20:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Porsche

For your information, I am fielding a RfC with Porsche (to which this project has indicated interest) as one example at Wikipedia talk:Article titles#RfC: When COMMONNAME depends on country, culture, or demography Yiba (talk | contribs) 09:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

ADC Telecommunications

Can anyone please tell me whether this company exists presently? They are running an ad in Craigslist for workers at home. I can not find any information to verify their authenticity, can anyone assist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.51.112.74 (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

ASBIS and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ASBIS

Dear company experts: This mainspace article is poorly sourced, and a COI editor took advice and created a replacement in AfC which eventually came to have much better references. However, because of the existing article, it can't be accepted. I know little about companies, so I am looking for someone who would be willing to merge the two articles, moving over from the draft whatever text and sources are an improvement on the original article, while crediting User:Anna Iv and User:ASBIS.cmg in the edit summary. Can anyone help? —Anne Delong (talk) 15:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles

Hello. Some decision has to be taken on what to do with Fiat S.p.A. and Chrysler Group LLC now that the two are merging into Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. Come and discuss here at Talk:Fiat Chrysler Automobiles — Cloverleaf II (talk) 16:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Servicing Stop nominated for deletion

There is an AfD for Servicing Stop, a seemingly non-notable company, which is in the scope of your project. The discussion can be found here. Primefac (talk) 13:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Porsche Salzburg

For your information, I have revised the content of Porsche Salzburg from a car race entrant to a major company, and created Porsche Holding Salzburg as another common name redirect page to Porsche Salzburg. Porsche Holding GmbH headquartered in Salzburg, Austria is the largest car distributor in Europe. Yiba (talk | contribs) 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Arun3000h/Haier India - is this a notable company, or part of Haier?

Dear company experts: This draft article was userfied after removing copyvio and promotional text (some of which appears to have returned). I don't know enough about company structures to be able to tell if this is a separate company from Haier, which appears to be of Chinese rather than Indian origin. If it is part of the same company, it could be turned into a redirect, since there doesn't appear to be any particular information about operations in India. If it's a different company with a similar name, is it notable? —Anne Delong (talk) 18:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

MarketOne international

Hi, how do I set up a a new article, description of the company I work for MarketOne International. MarketOne International LLP

Thank you for the help!

M

Click on new Article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.17.45.125 (talk) 07:31, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

WP:VG comments subpages cleanup

Hi, there is currently a discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#VG comments subpages regarding whether it would be acceptable to permanently shift all comments subpages associated with WP:VG articles into talk. This shift would follow the recommended approach given at WP:DCS. The WikiProject Companies articles that would be affected by this action are these:

If you have objections related specifically to WikiProject Companies' use of these subpages, please make this clear at the discussion so that other unrelated talk pages can be cleaned up where appropriate. Thank you. -Thibbs (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Westfield Group and Scentre Group

Hi all,

There's currently a pending issue with in regards to the Westfield Group article.

Here's a bit of background: in 2014 the shopping centre group Westfield split it's operations [8] - into two separate companies: Westfield Corporation and Scentre Group.

  • Westfield Corp. operates Westfield centres in the United States and United Kingdom.
  • Scentre Group operates Westfield centres in Australia and New Zealand.

The issue is: what happens to the Westfield Group article?

Shopping centres in Australia, as in New Zealand, are still under the brand of "Westfield", although they are operated by Scentre. Additionally, Westfield Group has it's history. Westfield is still existent.

My suggestion:

  • → Article: Westfield Group (or) Westfield (Retail): Shopping centres under the label of "Westfield" (as well as the history of the original company etc. And the mentioning of the new companies.)
    • → Section: Westfield Corporation: Handling Westfield centres in the US/UK; additionally a separate article can be created
    • → Section: Scentre Group: Handling Westfield centres in Aus/NZ; additionally a separate article can be created

Are there any suggestions on what should be done? —MelbourneStar☆talk 23:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adderstone Group

Hello, Company experts. Is this old AfC draft about a notable company? Should the page be kept and improved? —Anne Delong (talk) 03:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Attn: Nike, Inc. page

Hi, I'd like to draw attention to the fact that the page for Nike, Inc. is protected and hasn't seen any sort of cleanup or enhancement for quite some time. Is anyone available to check it out and clean it up a bit? It's a bit dated, and given the huge size of a company like Nike I think it would be worth a little more effort. Thanks!!107.188.179.77 (talk) 06:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Help with a new section for Verizon article?

Hello, I'm looking for an editor who might be able to help with looking at a new draft I'm suggesting for the Verizon Communications article. As I have explained here before, I am an employee of Verizon, and so don't make any direct edits myself. However, from time to time I have offered drafts to update the Verizon article and other related articles. Currently, I am suggesting a new section for discussing Verizon's "Corporate responsibility". You can find the draft in my userspace.

I have left a request on Talk:Verizon Communications, but there hasn't been any reply yet. If anyone here has the time to look and take my draft live, that would be great. Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Thanks so much, VZBob (talk) 16:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Companies To-do: 7digital

Hi there! I can see 7digital has been rated as Mid-importance on this WikiProject.

What work needs to be done and how can I help?

Thanks :) Llamalady28 (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Empoweredwoman (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)== Hansen Medical Page ==

Of the 27 references on the Hansen Medical page only 4 are from Hansen Medical. Why does it say there are too many primary sources? Does it need to be zero primary sources?

What words are categorized as advertising? Empoweredwoman 11/19/14

Angry Orchard Reads Like an Advertisement

I don't much edit wikipedia anymore, just thought I'd let you guys know I stumbled upon a terribly advert article Angry Orchard

I tagged it as such, don't know if that automatically alerts you guys though. 128.84.124.78 (talk) 06:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Attn: theScore, Inc. page

Hi - I'm an employee for theScore, Inc. and have noticed our existing page is extremely outdated and also contains a number of factual inaccuracies. I'd be very pleased to assist in drafting updates to this page, but want to adhere to best practices with regards to conflicts of interest. If anyone can assist in helping me in this matter it'd be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, James

Jamesbigg24 (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hill+Knowlton

Hi there, I'm looking for editors who might be interested to help improve the article for PR company, Hill+Knowlton, which falls under this WikiProject. Currently, the article's content suffers from POV issues, as it is focused almost entirely on a handful of more controversial clients and work, while there is little to no information about the company's history and overall operations. Although H+K is one of the largest and longest-established PR companies in the United States, the article's History is just five sentences long, and the only other section in the article, the Controversies section, dominates its content. Meanwhile, the actual name of the company is inconsistent throughout the article, and its current name "Hill+Knowlton Strategies" is not used at all in the main body of the article.

On the Talk page, I've proposed a new draft for the article that relies on secondary sources and aims to add more information about how the company operates, and how it has developed over time. I should note: I am working as a consultant to H+K and prepared the draft with the company's input, so I'm not going to make any edits to the article myself. Instead, I'm hoping to find editors who would be interested to review the draft and move the content into the live article if they feel it is appropriate. If you'd be able to help, please take a look at the full request on the Talk page. Don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions at all. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 17:56, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Uber RfC

Hi WikiProject Companies. There is a Request for Comment on the Uber article Talk page regarding the coverage of regulatory and legal issues in the article. Since the article is part of this WikiProject, editors here may want to join the discussion. The question under discussion is how the information on legal and regulatory issues would be best treated, particularly whether it should be summarized in the Uber article or potentially split off into its own article. Craig at Uber (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Updating Honeywell

I'm currently working on updating the page for Honeywell, making sure information is current and reorganizing the history so it reads more chronologically and cohesively. I declared COI on the talk page about two weeks ago and haven't seen any responses, so I thought I'd check in here and explore my options for gaining consensus on my proposed changes so I can submit an edit request. Please leave any comments or concerns on Talk:Honeywell, but also feel free to leave feedback on my talk page or on my draft. Thanks! FacultiesIntact (talk) 22:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

"Chrysler"

The name of the article Chrysler is under discussion, see talk:Chrysler -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

The move closed with the result that there will be no move. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Extra eyes on Portwest

Hi, I'm just your average wikignome. May I please request some more specialized eyes at Portwest? I've got a COI situation in which a user who likely works for the company keeps adding promotional fluff to the article in spite of numerous explanations, and I'm pretty much going at it alone. If you can help improve the article that would be great, but even if you were to simply add the page to your watchlist and help to direct the focus of the article away from promotion, that would be helpful. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Cyphoidbomb I just checked in and it seems like the ip who had been editing for a couple of months has taken a break in the last month. Thanks for signalling. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions

I'm looking for someone to take on the project of creating a new page for this company. (I work in marketing for the company). It's a nonprofit, so I'm not sure if my request is in the right place here, but it does have significant media coverage and sources available. Could anyone suggest next steps?

Here is the full request. TeeBright (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

I suggest you advertise elsewhere. I can't see anything noteworthy about another "nonprofit", funded by creditors, so you can entice broke consumers into paying their debts. ChristineBaker1 (talk) 23:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm not advertising, but can't help but find your comment irrelevant and unfair. The company receives funding from creditors, yes, but over 20 percent of revenue comes from government funding, and over 16 percent from philanthropic support (see annual report). The notability of the company is also well established, given the numerous publications that have featured ClearPoint's data, used ClearPoint's clients in research studies (Kaiser and Ohio State University), and included ClearPoint's commentary on timely consumer issues. TeeBright (talk) 13:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

@TeeBright: Requested articles is the right place to request someone create an article, but it contains a very large number of articles and only a few that someone picks up. Realistically you'd have to create a neutral article with proper secondary sources yourself and submit it to Articles for Creation. However, most COI-submitted articles there are also rejected, because they tend not to be neutral or not meet the requirements for an article. If you are not an experienced Wikipedian familiar with all our rules and norms, what I would suggest is just submitting a three-sentence stub to articles for creation, with a filled-out infobox and the best possible, in-depth sources to verify its notability. This will get the article started; then you can hope other editors take an interest in it. CorporateM (Talk) 15:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

FICO scoring - Credit Bureaus

I am currently in litigation against credit bureau Equifax, last sued Trans Union in about 2009, Experian 2006 and Fair Isaac (FICO) in 2003. I'd like to update their pages with unrelated litigation and regulatory investigations. Is there a conflict of interest? ChristineBaker1 (talk) 23:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

@ChristineBaker1: The technical definition of COI depends on your motives, rather than your circumstance, but I would think that is very much so a position that would at the least create an appearance of a COI. Personally, I would love to see you improve the pages anyway, but given that your identity is disclosed, it might expose you to legal risk from the orgs involved. Probably what I would do in your shoes is ask an admin about using an alternate account to protect your identity for this particular circumstance and asking someone to take a look at your contributions before making them. Someone else may reasonably offer very different advice though. CorporateM (Talk) 15:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
@ChristineBaker1 and CorporateM: I've a somewhat different view from that expressed by CorporateM. I would suggest that you not pursue editing as you have suggested. As CorporateM says, it could have the appearance of COI, but it is also just another thing you are doing which has a touch point with a struggle you are in. There is such a vast array of things which can and should be done here, that I think your stepping away from these particular articles would be prudent. As for editing under a different account ... If you do want to remain engaged in the articles, I would suggest that you instead post suggestions for edits on the talk page; this indicates your recognition of the potential for COI and allows uninvolved editors to take the suggestions and implement them. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Also good advice, even if it is very different from mine. CorporateM (Talk) 00:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Suggested amendments to Andrex page

Hi, my name is Eoin Sandford. I work for MHP Communications in London as a Senior Account Executive. Andrex are a client of MHP. I have been asked if it would be possible to make a few amendments to the page by Andrex. Each suggested amendment has a link attached to back up the request. I have contacted this page as it is regarded in the talk section as an article of interest to this Wikiproject page. If there are any questions at all i am more than happy to answer. Please see below the suggested amendments:

Before the first paragraph in History could the following sentence please be added "Andrex was originally developed as a gentleman’s disposable handkerchief, which were sold exclusively in Harrods department store, London. Prior to this softer tissue, consumers used harsher products referred to as ‘shinies’, which were sold mainly through chemists – the most famous brands being Bronco and Izal". Please see link to reference this sentence [2]

In the third paragraph in history would it be possible to add the following information about the first advert in 1972. Please see the suggested amended text here: "The first Andrex Puppy advert was aired in 1972. The original concept was blocked by television regulators as it was thought that the image of a little girl running through her house trailing a roll of Andrex would encourage wastefulness. So, the little girl was replaced by a playful Labrador puppy that still stars in Andrex adverts today". Please see link to reference this suggested amedment [3]

In the third paragraph after the first sentence would it be possible to add the following sentence "Andrex was issued a Royal Warrant in 1978 for supplying Buckingham Palace with toilet tissue". Please see link to reference this sentence: [4]

After the Royal Warrant sentence to coincide with the history timeline would this sentence please be added "Andrex was the first brand to introduce moist toilet tissue to the UK in 1992". Please see this reference which is taken from another Wikipedia page: [5]

Andrex replaced it advertising slogan in 2014. Would it be possible to add the following sentence as the last sentence in the history section "In 2014, Andrex replaced its advertising slogan Soft, strong and very very Long, with How Andrex do you feel?". Please see this reference which is taken from Marketing Week [6]

Eoinsandford (talk) 11:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

In general sounds a good idea. First two sound like paraphrases of the Superbrands article. I would suggest rewriting in original words. Third: the source doesn't say which royal granted the warrant. I guess we can look this up somewhere. Four: a claim to be the first probably needs to verified. Five: no opinion. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 20:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)


Thanks for getting back to me. I have made edits as per your request to the first two suggestions. I have also found new references for the royal warrant and verifying Andrex as the first to ::introduce moist toilet tissue.
Here is the amended piece for before the first paragraph. "Andrex was originally developed as a disposable handkerchief. Harrods department store in London sold the handkerchiefs ::exclusively. Before Andrex brands such as Bronco and Izal produced products that were harsher. They were mainly sold through chemists and known as “shinies”.
Here is the suggested amend for the third paragraph in history. "One of the most popular ads in the UK almost did not happen. The original idea by Andrex in 1972 was for a girl to run ::through a house trailing a roll of Andrex. The television regulators did not approve this as they felt it encouraged children to be wasteful. Andrex decided to use a Labrador puppy instead."
Please see the new reference for the royal warrant[7]
Please see the new reference to verify Andrex as the first manufacturer of moist toilet tissues. It is mentioned in the final paragraph before description[8]

Eoinsandford (talk) 11:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

I added your two proposals for history. I, and others, will probably further edit your contributions.

The Royal Warrant probably belongs in the Kimberly-Clark article, as it doesn't mention Andrex or toilet paper.

We can't use Wikipedia as a reference.

(I don't speak for Wikipedia or for any group of editors: these are my personal responses to your requests.)

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

References for this section

  1. ^ T.B.D. Licenses O.O.E.C.P. Records revisions lowering decibal on toxcicity.SPOKANE WASH.
  2. ^ http://www.brandrepublic.com/article/189282/superbrands-case-studies-andrex
  3. ^ http://www.brandrepublic.com/article/189282/superbrands-case-studies-andrex
  4. ^ http://www.brandrepublic.com/article/189282/superbrands-case-studies-andrex
  5. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet_paper
  6. ^ http://www.marketingweek.com/2014/06/30/andrex-refocuses-marketing-around-intimate-care-in-4-6m-campaign/
  7. ^ https://www.royalwarrant.org/company/kimberly-clark-ltd?back=%2Fdirectory%3Fquery%3Dkimberly-clark
  8. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet_paper

Quest celebrates some more

The company Quest Diagnostics seems to be written by the company's PR staff. This is the MetPath survivor which has become so dominant by acquiring all potential competitors. Can someone with a better grasp of history make this fairy tale a little more believable? Is the country better off having all of the former laboratory diversity homogenized into a single mega-laboratory?LeastRecent (talk) 00:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Help with Steelcase

Hi there. A month ago, I proposed a new History section on the Steelcase Talk page to replace the bulleted list that currently appears in the article. I prepared the draft on behalf of the company, so I'm not making any edits myself. I've reached out several places for assistance reviewing it, but have had trouble finding anyone to help. Although I did have one editor write back, after I replied they haven't returned to the page. I'm hoping an editor here might be willing to take a look and give feedback if they have any. You can find the draft and additional information about my proposed changes here. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 18:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

GE Capital Aviation Services

This article currently documents when large outlays of capital are used to purchase new capital assets (airliners), but when I tried to document a large monetary loss due to the write-off of such a capital asset (an airliner), it's been reverted. Shouldn't this article also document large monetary losses due to the the destruction of capital goods? -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 06:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I replied at Talk:GE_Capital_Aviation_Services#Additions_and_losses --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 19:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Lists of companies

Lists of companies is a new article. WikiProject Companies members are invited to help improve it. North America1000 12:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Nicely done. Kuru (talk) 00:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Lists of past employees

I notice our Cravath, Swaine & Moore article is dominated by a detailed list of 80+ Notable current and former employees. I don't recall seeing such lists in other company articles, even those about prominent law firms in the UK, but I notice that a couple of other firms in Category:Law firms based in New York City do have "Notable alumni" lists, though they're a lot shorter (Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Sullivan & Cromwell). Is there a point at which such lists become simply promotional? Come to that, is their very existence rather promotional? NebY (talk) 20:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

@NebY: I don't think there is something inherently wrong with this, as long as the lists are sourced and the inclusion criteria are clear. If the list becomes too large a part of the article, it can be split to a separate article. I can see your argument about promotion as in "Seeee how many important people have worked with us ... shouldn't you too?", but that is an interpretation and it need not be assumed to be the intent of the inclusion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 22:21, 8 April 2015 (UTC) .... a second thought on this is that inclusion of a list of notable alumni of a company is a lazy way of writing the article. If the people substantively contributed to the company, then should their contributions be included in the narrative instead? I would generally say "yes" to that. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 22:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I should have said the effect seemed promotional, not the intent; without checking, I suspect the list has grown partly in a spirit of thoroughness. I think your second thought identifies a big part of my unease. I suspect that approach would mean leaving out all but a handful. NebY (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Greetings from VimpelCom

Greetings from VimpelCom,

I was having a look at the Wikipedia pages on VimpelCom Ltd., and OJSC VimpelCom earlier today. I’d like to make you aware of a few things to consider in bringing the page up to date-please feel free to address these if you wish:

1. Since the page was last updated, VimpelCom Ltd. has made some changes to our geographic scope and management team globally. Our CEO is now Jean-Yves Charlier.

2. The following statement is what we normally use to describe our current scope:

VimpelCom, an international telecoms company operating in 14 countries and headquartered in Amsterdam, is one of the world’s largest integrated telecommunications services operators providing voice and data services through a range of traditional and broadband mobile and fixed technologies in Russia, Italy, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Armenia, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Algeria, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Zimbabwe.

VimpelCom’s operations around the globe cover territory with a total population of approximately 740 million people. VimpelCom provides services under the “Beeline”, “Kyivstar”, “WIND”, “Infostrada” “Mobilink”, “banglalink”, “Telecel”, and “Djezzy” brands. As of 31 December 2014, VimpelCom had 222 million mobile customers on a combined basis. VimpelCom is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol (VIP).

3. Below you will find information about our businesses across the world.

4. Highlights for each of our main brands follows below:

Beeline

Brand highlights

• More than 86 million customers in countries in Europe and Asia are served under the Beeline brand • The brand was first ranked among the 50 top brands in Europe in 2009 • Beeline Armenia is the only VimpelCom operating company that was once a state-owned fixed line operator • Beeline Georgia leapfrogged from 2G straight to 4G earlier in 2015

WIND/Infostrada

Brand highlights

• Wind and Infostrada are VimpelCom’s brands in Italy • Wind is VimpelCom’s Italian mobile business, noted for offering superior customer experience and value for money, and offering 2G, 3G and 4G services • Infostrada is VimpelCom’s fixed line business in Italy

Djezzy

Brand highlights

• The design of the new Djezzy logo represents the digital “play” arrow, and was introduced to coincide with the launch of 3G data services • Djezzy is a public-private partnership between VimpelCom and the Algerian National Investment Fund. VimpelCom holds 49% economic interest but maintains operational control • The Djezzy brand name is a combination of “Djaza,” meaning “reward” and Djazair, or “Algeria” in Arabic.


Kyivstar

Brand highlights

• Kyivstar is Ukraine’s market leader in mobile telecommunications, with 26 million customers • Kyivstar was recently awarded a 3G license and will launch mobile broadband services in 2015 • Kyivstar has a long history of identification as a Ukrainian operator and as one of the nation’s leading employers and taxpayers

Mobilink

Brand highlights

• Mobilink has 36.9 million subscribers • Mobilink became Pakistan’s first GSM operator in 1994 • Mobilink has received numerous awards for the SMS-based literacy program for rural women the Mobilink Foundation runs in cooperation with UNESCO

Banglalink

Brand highlights

• Banglalink is Bangladesh’s second-largest operator • Banglalink was awarded a 3G license in 2014 and is rapidly expanding the availability of data services across all 66 of the country’s districts • Banglalink’s voice-activated “Krishi Bazaar” agricultural market received the World Communication Award in 2011 and numerous other honors

Yours sincerely,

Mike Klein Senior Editor Group Communications, VimpelCom mike.klein@vimpelcom.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.111.209.162 (talk) 14:57, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Help with Vianovo

Hi. I've been asked by the firm Vianovo to request a few updates to their article. Last week I posted a note on the Talk page asking for help with a few minor edits to the article following the replacement of one of the firm's partners. Since it's a fairly new article, I don't think many editors are watching the Talk page and no one has responded yet. Would anyone here be able to look over the edits I'm proposing and make the changes if they seem OK? As I am working on behalf of Vianovo, I don't want to make any edits myself. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 14:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Done (mostly) More detail at Talk:Vianovo. Thanks for doing the right thing and adhering to the COI Bright Line. There is a one month backlog of 62 requests at Category:Requested edits so you are lucky I picked your article first. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you again for your help (and for the recognition)! Heatherer (talk) 15:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

suggested edits to Analog Devices

Hi all, I've proposed several updates/additions to Analog Devices, here. I have a COI and won't be editing directly, but I have several factual updates and minor improvements I believe would benefit the article, and would really appreciate if someone could take a look and provide feedback. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

The Walt Disney Company listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for The Walt Disney Company to be moved to Disney. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

SRG SSR listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for SRG SSR to be moved to Swiss Broadcasting Corporation. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Manganese Bronze Holdings listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Manganese Bronze Holdings to be moved to The London Taxi Company. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

SIGG listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for SIGG to be moved to Sigg. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Beijing Automotive Industry Holding Co Ltd listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Beijing Automotive Industry Holding Co Ltd to be moved to BAIC Group. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

BBCN listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for BBCN to be moved to BBCN Bancorp Inc.. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Vistra Group Holdings listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Vistra Group Holdings to be moved to Vistra. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

United Western Minerals Company

I began the page for United Western Minerals Company today. It is the mother of all stubs. The company only existed in the 1950s (I think). It's linked by three pages, one of which is my current project, Norman Dike. I think there's more to the company, but I live in a semi-rural area with a small library and I've used up my Google leads. If the company is non-notable, I'd rather know sooner than later. Thanks.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 22:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

I did a quick search in my library's online resources, but nothing turned up. CorporateM (Talk) 22:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Ace Books FAR

I have nominated Ace Books for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Crispulop (talk) 08:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

I want to add Vegetarian Shop Pvt Ltd as a company

Hello,

First of all clearly disclosing that I am a co-founder of the company Vegetarian Shop Pvt Ltd in India.

This company is a for-profit company in India. The main objective of the company is to promote compassionate lifestyle and providing cruelty free products in India. It is India's first company providing such option.

It has been featured in number of news sites, articles sites and magazines. If my request can be considered, than I can share all the links with you. You can also search for Vegetarian Shop (www.vegetarianshop.in)

--Dharmeshrdoshi (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Considering adding your company into the Wikipedia:Articles for creation workstream. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Dharmeshrdoshi. Are you able to provide two links to in-depth profile stories about this company? (generally speaking, we need at least two credible, independent sources, where the company is the main focus of the article, to write a page). CorporateM (Talk) 04:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello CorporateM

Appreciate your positive reply and hope to get the same in future too to help me list our efforts. Below are few external links for your reference.

https://www.zaubacorp.com/company/VEGETARIAN-SHOP-PRIVATE-LIMITED/U74900MH2013PTC244704 http://onesoullife.com/the-vegetarian-shop/ http://withstartups.com/founder-interview-vegetarianshop-in/ http://www.makeupandbeautytreasure.com/2014/03/vegetarianshop.in-cruelty-free-website-review.html http://www.speakbindas.com/vegetarian-shop-in/ http://www.startuptimes.in/2013/11/vegetarianshop-100-vegetarian-personal.html http://www.readstartups.com/Vegetarian-Shop http://theindianfuchsia.blogspot.in/2014/03/introducing-vegetarian-shop-initiative.html http://karmaoverdogmafamily.blogspot.in/2013/11/list-of-vegan-lifestyle-products-in.html http://www.vegguide.org/entry/18676 https://secure.shopclues.com/vegetarianshop.html

Kindly let me know if anything else is required from my end. Thank you.

Dharmeshrdoshi (talk) 12:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

"S.A."

The usage and primary topic of S.A. is under discussion, see talk:S.A. (corporation) and talk:S.A. for multiple discussions. -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Listing charting books under publisher

Question for the community, is it considered promotional to list individual charting books under an article about the publisher? Example: Morgan James Publishing#Publishing. It seems that well-written articles with a substantial history from many editors like John Wiley & Sons and Random House do not do this, nor does the short article on niche publisher Berkley Books. — Brianhe (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

@Brianhe: In this case, books are their products, so I would look at WP:ORGLISTS under the Products sub-section. We should list the books if they are notable enough for their own page or few in number. If there are a lot of books and they are not individually significant, then the list becomes an indiscriminate collection of information. CorporateM (Talk) 22:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Merge Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations into this WikiProject

I was looking for some guidance on notability of non-profit organizations and came across Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations. It seems activity on this project is very limited and many ends are left loose (for example Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations/Categorization). Why not merge Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations into Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies? Gpeja (talk) 22:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Support Articles about corporations and other types of organizations are essentially very similar and there is no reason to spread editor participation so thin across a large number of mostly inactive Wikiprojects. CorporateM (Talk) 03:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Help with MetLife History section

Hi everybody, I'm working on behalf of MetLife to propose improvements to their article. Two weeks ago, I suggested some changes to the article's History section, but so far I haven't had any replies. Since the article is of interest to this WikiProject, I'm hoping someone here might be interested in checking it out. Because of my COI, I will not be making any edits myself, but instead ask that other editors review my work and move it to the live article if they agree with the changes. I'm watching the Talk page and can respond to any comments or questions you may have there. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project

A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Wikipedia. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements. These possible copyright violations can be searched by WikiProject categories. Use "control-f" to jump to your area of interest (if such a copyvio is present).--Lucas559 (talk) 20:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Former private equity portfolio companies

Category:Former private equity portfolio companies, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deleting. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Requested page move notification: Facel→Facel Vega

I have proposed that an article within the scope of this Wikiproject, Facel, be moved to Facel Vega. Discussion here. —Cloverleaf II (talk) 16:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Companies initially financed with venture capital

Category:Companies initially financed with venture capital, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 01:31, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Relevant AfD

Hello there! Care to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netatmo? Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of NewsBank for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NewsBank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewsBank until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 08:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Line2

My company Line2 (formerly Toktumi) went through a name change earlier this year, we would like to completely transition to "Line2" and also add in our logo on the right column. I have legal documentation on the name change if requested. Please advise! Helloline2 (talk) 00:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

My company Line2 (formerly Toktumi) went through a name change earlier this year, we would like to completely transition to "Line2" and also add in our logo on the right column. I have legal documentation on the name change if requested. Please advise! Helloline2 (talk) 00:37, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

"Traded as" field in Infobox airline

Template:Infobox airline is used on airline articles in lieu of Template:Infobox company. While the airline infobox contains most of the parameters found in the company infobox, one notable omission is the "traded as" parameter for an airline's stock ticker. This seems like a useful parameter for companies, but my attempts to have it added to the airline infobox have been blocked for lack of consensus. Omission of this parameter means that airline companies like Delta Air Lines and Qantas do not have the stock symbol in their infobox. These two articles do have the symbol in their lead sentence, but such use is contrary to WP:TICKER and this RfC. Since activity on the airline infobox is limited and most comments come from members of WikiProject Aviation, I think some members of this project should comment on the matter: Template talk:Infobox airline#Needs traded_as field (and possibly others). AHeneen (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Agree As long as an airline is a company, which seems to be the case, the infobox should include the parameter.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 19:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
@Gaarmyvet: Please add your support at Template talk:Infobox airline#Needs traded_as field (and possibly others). AHeneen (talk) 19:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Done!--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 19:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

I was wondering if providing a template with LinkedIn , Twitter and Youtube handles for a company will be a good idea . This template can be used in the External links section for all corporations specifically wherein this otherwise social media category holds importance in terms of a company's authenticity .

I am particularly skipping Template:Facebook since not many corporations are using it as an efficient channel yet, though I am not totally against it.


See existing templates that are in-use already for reference / relevance: Template:Twitter, Template:YouTube.

Comments invited. Devopam (talk) 13:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

@Devopam: Currently Wikipedia:External links lists social media sites under WP:LINKSTOAVOID (#10). There are very rare exceptions, such as when the company is particularly known for its use of social media, but in most cases these links should be removed. CorporateM (Talk) 16:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Adding VanDutch as a company

Fist of all, I'm affiliated to VanDutch. A marketing manager was a bit too eager submitting an article to wikipedia and made it way too commercial instead of being informative and neutral. I have rewritten the article with good references from many respected boating and yachting sources such as boating.com, Canadian yachting magazine, nautiqueyachting.com, etc. It's similar to other yachting brands such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Ray and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayliner . Now I can't just upload it myself due to COI. What's the best way to upload it as a draft so it can be reviewed by an independent editor, without someone having to find all the information I already have collected, written about and styled in a wikipedia format?


external sources for the article

Below are the sources for the article I've written.

Well known boat designer Frank Mulder helped with the First VanDutch 40; http://boatcanwest.com/reviews/2011-van-dutch-marine-van-dutch-40-cruiser Google for Fank Mulder yachts and you will find he's well known in this market.

Some history: VanDutch expanded to the USA: http://www.charterworld.com/news/vandutch-introduction-americas-usa Marquis started building the VanDutch boats: http://www.yachtingmagazine.com/marquis-build-vandutch-yachts

Formula E sponsorship: http://www.nautiqueyachting.com/tr/news-detail/5/Amlin-Aguri-Team-sponsored-by-VanDutch the development of the VanDutch Electric as a result of this sponsorship: http://www.mby.com/news/van-dutch-green-electric-yacht-range-45554

By Googling for "Van Dutch" you will notice thei boats are all over the place, from marketplaces where they are for sale, to news articles and more.


Rickned (talk) 08:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

@Rckned: Click here and paste in your draft. If there is not currently a live article, submit it using the code {{subst:submit}} at the top. If there is already an article, go to the Talk page of the article, add {{Request edit}} to the top of your Talk page post and ask around for help. Please note that adding sponsorships is often seen as promotion if the sources are not strong enough and in this case the sources provided are just short blurbs. CorporateM (Talk) 08:24, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
@Rickned: I will be more than glad to be of help should you choose to. Devopam (talk) 13:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
@Devopam: :@CorporateM: Thank you for your feedback. Devopam; I have added the article to my Sandbox. I have also changed the reference for the sponsorship as per CorporateM's feedback. Rickned (talk) 02:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
@Rickned:, you might have better used someone else's sandbox as you are dangerously close to COI issues . I learnt it thanks to some very kind and sensible reviewers . Devopam (talk) 03:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
@Devopam: Thanks for the warning. I thought the sandbox was exactly what it was - a sandbox (ie: testing ground). I removed it now. I wrote on your talk page if you don't mind. Still a lot to learn for me :) Rickned (talk) 03:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand Devopam correctly, but please don't use somebody else's sandbox. Based on the sources provided however, it doesn't look like the company qualifies for a Wikipedia page. WP:CORP requires at least two in-depth profiles in the press written by independent, professional journalists, before a company can have a page, whereas these are just blurbs and listings. Anything with a "get more information: URL" is typically more of an advertisement or listing, whereas we need investigative journalism.
Can you tell us the company's employee count and revenues or is this information confidential since it is a private company? CorporateM (Talk) 03:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
:@CorporateM: I have to discuss if that can be made public. However this article provides some public details: http://medberths.com/2013/12/atlantic-shift-for-vandutch/ . It covers the news that Marquis is building the VanDutch yachts. Marquis is hiring 100 extra employees for the order. Additionally it says the deal is for at least 420 yachts. The sales price of a single VanDutch yacht starts at over half a million USD, so it's an easy calculation to determine the minimum turnover we are talking about.
Besides those numbers there are various articles written by independent journalists about VanDutch. For example http://northcoastmma.org/media/47458/pulaskifactoryatforefrontluxuryyachtindustry10-8-2014.pdf , http://www.metrocitizen.net/the-ritz-carlton-residences-miami-beach-and-vandutch-celebrated-the-miami-international-boat-show/ , http://www.sail-world.com/VanDutch-day-boat-will-impress-at-Sanctuary-Cove/93879 (coverage of the VanDutch at the Australian boat show + interview - it does have a link) . Rickned (talk) 04:53, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Uber RfC

Hi WikiProject Companies! There is a Request for Comment on the Uber article Talk page regarding the description of the company's history in the article. Since the article is of interest to this WikiProject, editors here may want to join the discussion. The question under discussion is how Uber's history might be best summarized within subsections. Thanks, Craig at Uber (talk) 20:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

"Thus"

The usage and primary topic of Thus is under discussion, see talk:Thus (company) -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Size standards

I found some company size standards here: https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/6ak7pBLXv

May be helpful to add to articles about companies so lay people can understand figures better. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Help with MetLife Operations section?

Hello again, WikiProject Companies editors! I received some help regarding my earlier post re: the MetLife History section, and now looking for editors to review my suggestion for the creation of an Operations section in that article. I'd love feedback from editors who are active here. Please can you take a peek and let me know if you have any feedback! Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello, occasionally I am cleaning up company articles from promo language and link spam, and come across 1) lists of offices and other non-notable subdivisions 2) lists of leading staff below top level executives 3) lists of "competitors". Commonly those lists are unsourced and we have to take the company's word for it. In my opinion such content is against WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE (even though those types of lists are not explicitly mentioned). Could someone clarify the current consensus on such lists in company articles please or point me to the relevant guideline? I am fairly sure, this aspect has been discussed already, but can't find the specific information. Which types of lists are OK and which level of detail is acceptable? GermanJoe (talk) 09:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I have suggested a clarification of WP:NOTDIRECTORY at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#WP:NOTDIRECTORY_-_simple_listings. GermanJoe (talk) 13:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Are 501c3s ours?

I'm seeing inconsistent results, probably because they're called non-profit corporations. I think they fall under WP:Organizations, not us, but do we have a consensus? Alaynestone (talk) 01:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Help updating BP article

Hello, I am posting here as a COI editor with a request that I hope someone can help with. As I've noted here previously, I work for BP and I avoid making any direct edits myself. I recently made a request on the BP article's Talk page with updates based on the company's 2014 financial results and a few other new reports. A few of the requests have been completed, but there are still a few left. I wanted to ask if anyone here could make these changes. There is more information in my Talk page message, but here is an overview of my request:

  • Updating production numbers, such as proved reserves, barrels per day of oil equivalent produced, and cubic feet per day of natural gas produced
  • Updating the number of service stations and wells the company has

I would appreciate it if an editor could make these updates. Thanks. Arturo at BP (talk) 17:21, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Commenting again so that others see that this request is still open. I'm hoping someone here might be able to help. Thanks. Arturo at BP (talk) 20:49, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
hi @Arturo at BP: , please email me the information and I will take it up over the weekend after due diligence. I will have a look at the article talk page in a while as well. Devopam (talk) 05:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Devopam, I apologize for the delayed response. Because of my conflict of interest I want to be transparent and prefer not to discuss requests via email. However, I recently placed an updated request outlining the remaining edits that I'm asking for at the very bottom of the BP Talk page. I would be happy to answer any questions you might have there. Thanks. Arturo at BP (talk) 15:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi @Arturo at BP:, saw your note on the other page. I asked you to email the content / proposed changes as there are too many partially completed sub-requests for edit that have been completed, and I found it difficult to segregate the pending ones . I will take a look and possibly make some changes after going through the content again on talk page. However, I could not understand your request for rephrasing facts. That is something natural for an editor and hard to comply in my opinion. Devopam (talk) 08:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Devopam, sorry if there's any confusion, I'm not looking to rephrase anything but to replace the out-of-date stats and information in the article with the most recent details based on the company's most recent Annual Report. Does that make it clearer? Arturo at BP (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

vault.com

Hello, a discussion about the usage of this ranking website, mostly for COI-editing and promotional puffery in company articles, has been posted at WP:RSN, if any project members want to comment. GermanJoe (talk) 15:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft

Hello. I'm seeking assistance reviewing a new draft I'm proposing for the article on law firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. I've started a discussion over on the Talk page explaining why I think an article overhaul is needed and included a link to my draft. I haven't had any responses yet, so I'm hoping folks here might be able to take a look and offer suggestions for improvement, as the entry falls under the scope of this project. I've also posted a request at WP:LAW. As mentioned here before, I am working on Wikipedia as a paid consultant, and I prepared this draft as part of my work at Beutler Ink for Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. Because of this, I will not be making edits to the article. I appreciate any help editors here can provide. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 15:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Name change

My company Line2 (formerly Toktumi) went through a name change earlier this year, we would like to completely transition to "Line2" and also add in our logo on the right column. I have legal documentation on the name change if requested. Please advise! Helloline2 (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Helloline2:. Such edit requests are usually best posted on the article's talkpage. I have moved the page as requested (verified by a quick Internet search). The Line2 logo seems simple enough, so you should be able to upload it to Commons yourself (or provide me with a good URL to the logo image and I'll upload it). Regards. GermanJoe (talk) 20:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Discussion on AFD X-Systems

This is to notify that a current discussion is ongoing for Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/X-Systems#X-Systems should you want to participate and express your opinion and/or contribute to the article. Devopam (talk) 13:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Brickworks Limited: contains content written like an advertisement

Hey guys, so Ive been trying to fix up this wiki page but I just cant seem to get it right. It keeps saying it has content that is written like an advertisement, which is funny because I am an advertising student (just to be clear, I dont work for this company).

Could anyone please take a look and identify places that need to be changed?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brickworks_Limited

Cheers.

Supergeneric101 (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

New Companies delsort category

A new deletion sorting page was created on 16 October 2015 for companies, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies. North America1000 20:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

PeoplePlus page

Hi editors, my name is Lucia and I work for PeoplePlus, a company recently formed (July 6th this year) through the merger of former welfare and training organisations Avanta and A4e. I have noticed that the old A4e page has been changed to PeoplePlus, however, this doesn't reflect the most up to date information. I am aware of Wikipedia's COI guidelines and therefore I don't want to edit the copy myself, however, I would like to understand how this information can be updated correctly. Here is the press release [1] and a link to the PeoplePlus website containing the correct and most up-to-date information <ref?www.peopleplus.co.uk</ref>. Appreciate your help (Lucia asanache (talk) 13:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)).

References

  1. ^ http://www.staffline.co.uk/staffline-acquisition-a4e/
(talk page stalker) Hello @Lucia asanache:, thank you for following Wikipedia's COI-guideline. You could either post your suggestion at the article's specific talkpage or at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation/Paid editor help as central forum for such requests. In both cases, please make sure to add {{edit request}} at the beginning of your message (see Template:edit request for more details) and provide a reliable source for your information. Be as specific as possible in your change request (or provide a new version of the affected text yourself). Hope that helps a bit - feel free to ping me on my talkpage, if you have any other questions. GermanJoe (talk) 16:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Do these articles seem fishy to anyone?

Do these articles seem fishy to anyone? Handxom and Sûrtab. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 06:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

At first glance, yes. However, I looked at the edit history to see who created them and if they were spam. Both were created by User:Savvyjack23, who has made a substantial amount of edits on Wikipedia, especially on Haiti-related subjects. Looking at the articles, they are short but referenced with WP:RS and I think they are ok. AHeneen (talk) 07:12, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the vote of confidence AHeneen . I'm having a good laugh right now Sbmeirow. (Really?) Savvyjack23 (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
This isn't a blog, so keep snarky comments to yourself. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 19:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Wasn't snarky, I am just curious as to how you arrived at that presumptuous conclusion, hence my question. Savvyjack23 (talk) 19:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Bank of New York Mellon

Hi, I'm posting to see if anyone might be interested in reviewing three simple updates I proposed on The Bank of New York Mellon Talk page. I haven't had a response there yet, and the article falls under the scope of this WikiProject. As I've mentioned here previously, I am working as a paid consultant to make suggestions to improve the BNY Mellon article, so I will not be making any changes myself. Instead, I ask that others make edits where they think it is appropriate. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 17:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Help with a draft article

I need some help from someone familiar with company articles. Recently the article for the Assurance Agency was nominated for deletion as unambiguous promotion. I moved it to the draftspace (Draft:Assurance Agency) since there was somewhat of an assertion of notability and it's possible that the article could be cleaned. The article is kind of spammy, given that the coverage in the article is only glowing and it lists just about every award that the company has won. They all appear to be local awards, so I'm not sure that all of them are usable to show notability. The company sponsors one of the awards, so that one is obviously not usable for notability giving purposes. They've landed on some lists for major magazines/publishers, but some of those are just on the local level, which tends to be depreciated. Someone familiar with company awards definitely needs to take a look at this. There's also an issue with verification since some of the sourcing is used to source things that do not show notability. To top things off, only a small portion of the sourcing is actually independent of the company - you can read an overview of the sourcing here.

There's a COI concern here since the article does give off strong PR vibes and there's other evidence to suggest a PR/marketing person. The editor in question has stated that she is not, but I do think that she'd benefit from someone who can explain overall policy to her as far as companies are concerned. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice to participants at this page about adminship

Participants here often create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are considerations at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and maybe even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Gema Switzerland GmbH

We have a COI tag message on our Wikipedia entry. Can someone please help us with it? Thank you in advance. --PowderExperts (talk) 05:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Can please someone help us with the message? Thank you. --PowderExperts (talk) 06:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:HubPages#Removal of petition content - comments requested

Hi all, comments requested at Talk:HubPages#Removal of petition content, please. Subject: Whether a Change.org petition should be included in the article. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Ongoing AFD of Vocalocity

Notification.Aha... (talk) 08:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Would like to improve article about SolarReserve

Hi,

I am not trying to forum-shop, but I’m looking for the best way to improve the article about SolarReserve, where I work. See the current entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SolarReserve) and my proposed one in the sandbox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Marygrikas/sandbox). You’ll see that I’ve made sure to preserve the efforts that have gone into the entry to-date, but have provided updated and more complete information. Please let me know.

Best, Marygrikas

Notice to participants at this page about adminship

Many participants here create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, and much more. Well, these are just some of the considerations at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and maybe even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Support Article Request

I have requested an article for the company I currently work for, Cloudways. It is a Managed Cloud Web Hosting Provider. Back in 2013, whoever worked in the marketing department of this company, went on a spamming spree and got our website's homepage URL blacklisted on Wikipedia. I have asked for it to be removed from the blacklist. I have also requested an article on my company, as I believe we have been mentioned by reliable and renowned publications, which establishes notability. Kindly see my request [[9]] (Ctrl+F Cloudways) and comment on the quality of sources and whether you think it deserves an article. If yes, could anyone write it? As it would be a conflict of interest for me to start writing on Cloudways. Thanks. Zaindy٨٧ 12:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Help with Walmart article

 Completed

Hello, my name is Jenny (User:JLD at Walmart). As one of Walmart’s official representatives on Wikipedia, I have been respectful of Wikipedia’s financial conflict of interest guidelines and posted a request on the Walmart article Talk page requesting basic updates to facts and figures in the entry. An editor there completed a portion of the request, yet some items remain. Can someone take a look at my request? To avoid possible confusion with the partially completed request, I have added the remaining issues here. As you will see, I’m mainly hoping to fix, source or update existing content. I am happy to answer any questions. Thanks, JLD at Walmart (talk) 17:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Extended content

Introduction

  • The sentence: "It has over 11,000 stores in 28 countries, under a total of 65 banners" is no longer accurate.
    • Walmart has over 11,000 stores in 27 countries, under a total of 72 banners.[1]
  • If two inline citations are needed at the end of the first paragraph saying Walmart owns and operates Sam's Club, can we replace the 2010 annual report with the 2015 annual report[1] to make the references more current?

Retail rise to multinational status (1990–2005)

  • The first sentence in this section has a "Citation needed" tag. To address this, I propose rewriting that sentence:
    • While it was the No. 3 retailer in the U.S., Walmart was more profitable than rivals Kmart and Sears by the late 1980s. By 1990, it became the largest U.S. retailer by revenue.[2]
  • At the end of that paragraph, there is another "Citation needed" tag. We can rewrite the following sentence to eliminate redundancy and add a proper inline citation. Perhaps this would work:
    • Walmart stores opened throughout the rest of the country, with Vermont being the last state to get a store in 1995.[3]

Operating divisions

  • The opening paragraph relies on the 2010 annual report, so is now outdated by five years. The following is the most accurate current description, based on the 2015 annual report:
    • The company offers various retail formats throughout these divisions, including supercenters, supermarkets, hypermarkets, warehouse clubs, cash-and-carry stores, home improvement, specialty electronics, restaurants, apparel stores, drugstores, convenience stores and digital retail.[1]

Walmart U.S.

  • Revenue figures are five years old. To bring this up to date, the figures should say $288 billion, or 59.8 percent of total sales, for fiscal 2015.[4]

Sam's Club

  • Again, the revenue figures are outdated. They should say Sam's Club's sales were $58 billion, or 12 percent, during fiscal 2015.[4]

Corporate affairs

  • The reference to the 2010 annual report can be switched to the 2015 annual report, which echoes the earlier report's business model.[1]
  • I propose adding mention of current CEO Doug McMillon after the second sentence of the Corporate affairs section:
    • Doug McMillon became Walmart's CEO on February 1, 2014. McMillon began his Walmart career in warehouses while in high school. He has also worked as the head of Sam's Club and Walmart International.[5]


Citation details

References

  1. ^ a b c d "Walmart 2015 Annual Report" (PDF). stock.walmart.com (PDF). Walmart. p. 19. Retrieved 6 October 2015. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription=, |registration=, |editors=, and |dead-url= (help)
  2. ^ Hayes, Thomas C. (28 February 1990). "Wal-Mart Net Jumps By 31.8%". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  3. ^ "Timeline: An Overview of Wal-Mart". PBS. 20 August 2004. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  4. ^ a b "Walmart 2015 Annual Report" (PDF). stock.walmart.com (PDF). Walmart. p. 20. Retrieved 6 October 2015. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription=, |registration=, |editors=, and |dead-url= (help)
  5. ^ O'Keefe, Brian (4 June 2015). "The man who's reinventing Walmart". Fortune (magazine). Retrieved 21 July 2015.

Help with Hypo Alpe Adria Bank

The bank (or the holding company) was officially known as Hypo Alpe-Adria-Bank International until 2014, which some the Balkans subsidiaries were spin off as Hypo Group Alpe Adria (a holding company that purchased by Advent International), Italian subsidiary as HBI-Bundesholding AG in 2014. The parent company was renamed into Heta Asset Resolution, so how to properly rewrite the articles the reflect the new and old bank, good and old bank? The history of old Hypo Alpe-Adria-Bank should include in which article? in bad bank or good bank, or create another one? (Hypo Alpe-Adria-Bank International, Hypo Group Alpe Adria (possible adding Yugoslavia or (2014-) in the namespace?), Heta Asset Resolution)Matthew_hk tc 19:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

RfC at Talk:American International Group

I've opened a Request for Comment at Talk:American_International_Group regarding whether or not the content about the FCIC's findings should appear in both the lead and bailout sections. Any feedback is greatly appreciated.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

DriveTime logo and article update

Hi, I've created and proposed a new draft of the DriveTime article. The existing article that has evolved over the years is currently tagged as reading like an advertisement. In fact, the article contains unencyclopedic language and focuses a lot on DriveTime's predecessor, Ugly Duckling. I'm hoping editors will see that my draft eliminates WP:POV issues and is neutral and well-sourced. I'm new to Wikipedia and I've studied the site's guideline on conflict of interest and policy on paid editing. As an employee of DriveTime Automotive Group, Inc., I won't edit the article directly. The draft you'll see in my user space is essentially a complete rewrite. I originally posted an edit request on the DriveTime Talk page. While an earlier editor seemed interested in taking a look at my request, they had to excuse themself because they just don't have the time.

Additionally, I have uploaded a logo (File:DriveTime_logo.png) that can be used on the article. I received an automated message pointing out this will be deleted unless it's added to an article, so I hope someone can help before that happens.

Can somebody give a look?

Thank you, CP at DriveTime (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Request review of Point72/SAC split

I work for Point72, and have been making a few changes to the article with input from uninvolved Wikipedians. But I have a more substantial edit to propose, and I have not gotten much response thus far: splitting the article in two. If somebody could take a look, I'd appreciate it. Thanks for any input! -AlexReads (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Requesting review of new article

I have been building a basic article about my employer, Team One (advertising agency). I am working to avoid inserting bias or treating this like a marketing piece, in accordnce with WP:COI; I recognize that direct editing is discouraged, but I am doing my best to approach it in a neutral way. Any feedback or edits welcome. -PenaCynthia (talk) 17:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Requesting input re: adding large list of staff salaries to an article

I am seeking input regarding an author adding a large list of employee salaries to an article. I am unable to find any guidelines outside of infobox templates that would refute or validate these additions. Please see the talk at:

--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Again thank you for raising my edit for discussion when I requested.
Though I believe it is out of scope of this project which covers for-profit companies. The 12 line list in the edit is legally exclusively required of non-profit companies for public scrutiny. The cultural activity surrounding this information tends to overwhelmingly focus on non-profits. Formulairis990 (talk) 12:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Trouble finding references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce ...

The Wikipedia Library

Alexander Street Press (ASP) is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online: Premium collection" includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (like 60 minutes) and newsreels, music and theatre, speeches and lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. This collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, engineering, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. For more topics see their website.

There are up to 30 one-year ASP accounts available to experienced Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, please go to WP:ASP. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 21:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

RfC

Hello there! There's an ongoing RfC concerning Paul Singer and WP:NPOV in a broader sense, that you might care to comment on. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Help updating Maritz LLC article

Hello, My name is Madison (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MadisonfromStanding) I have submitted an edit to the page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Maritz,_LLC) and was wondering if someone wouldn't mind reviewing and incorporating the proposed changes to improve the page. I'm following Wikipedia's guidelines by requesting this here (due to a COI) and also because this group is focused on company pages. Please let me know if you have any questions about the proposed revisions MadisonfromStanding (talk) 17:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Help with Hilton Worldwide infobox

Resolved

On behalf of Hilton Worldwide, I'd like to request an update to the article's infobox. I've proposed three updates, which are described here. I've requested updates to: 1) the revenue figure, 2) number of employees, and 3) removal of the parent company.

These should be easy edits to complete, and I've provided formatted referencing, but I prefer not to edit the article directly because of my conflict of interest. Is someone able to respond to this request? Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for your consideration. -Inkian Jason (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Marking this section as resolved since the request has been answered. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 22:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit Request for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Industries

I'd like to request to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Industries#Guardrail_controversy, all edits will be within Wikipedia guidelines and will be cited by third-party sources. I'm requesting a Wikipedia to ensure there's no COI. Thanks.--Robphilips (talk) 18:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Help with Article

I submitted requested revisions on the talk page of this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:ET-Plus_Guardrail. Can a Wikipedia editor review the changes to confirm that everything adheres to Wikipedia guidelines and there's no COI. Thank you. --Robphilips (talk) 18:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

unsourced article

Ferrara Candy Company has recently undergone a rewrite by someone. I've added a few tags to it, but I don't usually do companies so it could use someone to take a deeper look. BlueSalix (talk) 00:29, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Looked at it; the old version seemed significantly superior. I've reverted to that and started addressing the sourcing. Kuru (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Kuru, had a suspicion it might be a paid editor but wasn't sure. BlueSalix (talk) 00:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Kuru I don't think they liked your changes. :) [10] BlueSalix (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Request to update the history section of the Hilton Worldwide article

Resolved

On behalf of Hilton Worldwide, I have another request to update the article, this time within its history section. I've identified some corrections/updates that should be made, which should be pretty painless to complete since the information all comes from a single website and does not require reference formatting or the inclusion of additional inline citations. However, because of my conflict of interest I would prefer not to make these edits directly. Is there a WikiProject Companies participant who is willing to review my request here? Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Update: My request has been answered, so I am marking this section as resolved. Inkian Jason (talk) 20:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Companies/Archive_2&oldid=1189649883"