A. Wagner

Welcome to the Commons, A. Wagner!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:87_7_114.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 20:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:87_7_115.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 20:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:87_7_116.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 20:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please tag your images

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you. Yuval Y § Chat § 19:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please link images

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Yuval Y § Chat § 19:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1871_005_015.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 15:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1872_017_173.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1872_017_173.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A. Wagner 14:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1872_011_vIX.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1872_011_vIX.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A. Wagner 18:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_010_066.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 15:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_011_107.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_011_107.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A. Wagner 17:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_011_108.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_011_108.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A. Wagner 17:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_011_109.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_011_109.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A. Wagner 17:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_011_110.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1873_011_110.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A. Wagner 17:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1876 006 118.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 15:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Norddeutsches Bundesgesetzblatt 1869 020 186.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Norddeutsches Bundesgesetzblatt 1869 020 186.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 23:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

done, copyright is o.k. --A. Wagner (talk) 12:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:General_von_Stiehle.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:General_von_Stiehle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A. Wagner (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quelle und Lizenz zu Image:Norddeutsches_Bundesgesetzblatt_1870_016_236.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Diese Datei könnte gelöscht werden.

Vielen Dank, dass du Image:Norddeutsches_Bundesgesetzblatt_1870_016_236.jpg hochgeladen hast. Leider gibt die Beschreibungsseite nicht an, wer den Inhalt erstellt hat, daher ist der Urheberrechts-Status unklar. Falls du den Inhalt selbst erstellt hast, vermerke dies bitte auf der Beschreibungsseite (siehe Lizenzbausteine weiter unten). Falls der Inhalt nicht von dir selbst stammt, musst du begründen, warum er auf den Commons verwendet werden darf, und angeben, woher die Datei stammt, z. B. mit einem Link zur Ursprungsseite und zu den Nutzungsbedingungen dort. Falls es sich um eine Bearbeitung handelt, musst du die Namen und eine Lizenz der ursprünglichen Autoren mit angeben.

Falls das Medium nicht mit einem Lizenzbaustein ausgezeichnet ist, musst du unbedingt einen hinzufügen. Wenn du das Bild, die Audiodatei oder das Video selbst erstellt hast, kannst du den Baustein {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} für die Creative Commons Lizenz oder {{PD-self}} für Gemeinfreiheit setzen. Siehe Commons:Lizenzvorlagen für die komplette Liste der nutzbaren Lizenzen und den dazugehörigen Lizenzbausteinen.

Bitte beachte, dass alle Bilder ohne Quellen- und/oder Lizenzangaben spätestens eine Woche nach dem Hochladen gelöscht werden. Dies kannst du auf der Seite Richtlinien zum Löschen nachlesen. Falls du noch andere Dateien hochgeladen hast, überprüfe bitte auch, ob dort Quellen- und Urheberinformationen angegeben sind. Du kannst alle von dir hochgeladenen Bilder mit dem Galerie-Tool ansehen.

Solltest du Fragen hierzu haben, stelle sie bitte im deutschsprachigen Forum oder dem mehrsprachigen Help desk. Für schnellere Antworten empfiehlt sich der Live-Chat-Raum #wikimedia-commons im IRC (Direktzugriff)!

Vielen Dank. How do you turn this on (talk) 11:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

allright, copyright wurde nachgetragen. (copyright is ok) --A. Wagner (talk) 01:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1877_000_000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A. Wagner (talk) 23:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1877, S. 216, 392

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Die Scans dieser Seiten sind derzeit nicht vorhanden. Bitte wenn möglich hochladen. --91.113.126.218 16:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Erledigt, Danke für Deine Mitarbeit --A. Wagner (talk) 14:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 12 years ago27 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, A. Wagner!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1892 033 II.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1892 033 IV.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1892 033 III.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1892 033 I.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1892 036 0739 b1.jpg was uncategorized on 5 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 002 I.jpg was uncategorized on 20 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 002 III.jpg was uncategorized on 20 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 002 IV.jpg was uncategorized on 20 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 030 VII.jpg was uncategorized on 24 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 030 VIII.jpg was uncategorized on 24 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 030 V.jpg was uncategorized on 24 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 030 II.jpg was uncategorized on 24 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 030 I.jpg was uncategorized on 24 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 030 VI.jpg was uncategorized on 24 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 030 III.jpg was uncategorized on 24 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 030 IV.jpg was uncategorized on 24 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1894 026 III.jpg was uncategorized on 27 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1894 026 II.jpg was uncategorized on 27 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1894 026 IV.jpg was uncategorized on 27 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1894 026 I.jpg was uncategorized on 27 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1895 016 III.jpg was uncategorized on 17 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1895 016 IV.jpg was uncategorized on 17 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1895 016 I.jpg was uncategorized on 17 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1895 016 II.jpg was uncategorized on 17 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1896 009 I.jpg was uncategorized on 26 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1896 009 II.jpg was uncategorized on 26 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:A. Wagner

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you please participate in this discussion: User talk:Axpde#Please allow for at least a week of discussion. Trycatch (talk) 06:59, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Zeno

Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Zeno.org hat an den Bilder durchs scannen keinerlei Rechte erworben, ich bezweifle auch dass sie die Bilder überhaupt selbst reproduziert haben, und nicht nur zusammengesammelt haben. Als Quelle Xeno anzugeben ist ok, aber wir brauchen nicht deren ganzen Disclaimer der sich auf Fälle bezieht, die nicht zutreffen (Siehe auch COM:ART). Außerdem fehlen im jetzigen Zustand jeglich Lizenzen. Bitte korrigiere dies--DieBuche (talk) 10:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

okay --A. Wagner (talk) 10:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Was hälts du davon einen tag wie diesen draufzusetzten (Yorck project mit Zeno.org ersetzten):

The work of art depicted in this image and the reproduction thereof are in the public domain worldwide. The reproduction is part of a collection of reproductions compiled by The Yorck Project. The compilation copyright is held by Zenodot Verlagsgesellschaft mbH and licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

. Damit wird auch die Quelle klarer. Falls du willst kann ich das später mit einem Bot machen, dann sparst du dir die handarbeit--DieBuche (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

prima Idee, wäre mir sehr recht. Danke. --A. Wagner (talk) 10:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

erledigt--DieBuche (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Danke nochmals, wird sicher auch für weitere Downloads von Zeno gebraucht.--A. Wagner (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Verschieberecht

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo A., ich habe dir das Verschieberecht gegeben, damit du Dateien bei falschem Namen nicht nochmals hochladen musst. --32X (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Recht herzlichen Dank, das vereinfacht die Arbeit. Bei der Masse von scans kanns schon mal vorkommen, dass Seitennamen falsch sind. --A. Wagner (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

RFA

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hello:

We don't know each other, but I've been actively recruiting people to apply for Administrator, so I hate to see us lose one. I don't think you're going to win this -- you need 75% positive votes and that means you'll need about 24 more positive votes to win. There are very rarely that many votes in an RFA.

The problem is clear, although you have edited many more pages than I had when I became an Administrator, your record shows that almost all of them have been files, with only a handful of other edits.

Why don't you do what I did? I decided I wanted to be an Administrator, so I spent a month and a half going through the lists of DRs on a regular basis and making appropriate comments. That got my name in front of Admins, showed that I was serious, and I was then a shoo-in. You could do the same. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your advices, but i think, it's too late, the election is done. That's life. --A. Wagner (talk) 19:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

No, it's not done for good, just for right now. It would probably be good if you withdrew now, rather than let it go to the end. Then, as I say, spend some time on DRs for a while and reapply. I will bet that you will then be elected. Read the comment from Amada44 at your RFA -- same thoughts as mine. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hallo! Ich wollte auch noch mal sagen, dass ich, gestützt auf die Kommentare anderer, volles Vertrauen in deine Person habe. Wenn du dich ein bisschen einarbeitest in die Löschanträge und dich sonst auch ein bisschen einbringst (zB im deutschen Forum) dann ist dein nächster RfA bestimmt erfolgreich! Liebe Grüsse, Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Friedrich - Das Kreuz im Gebirge

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hallo A. Wagner — du hast die Category:Galerie Neue Meister (Dresden) gestartet, die Tetscher Altar: Das Kreuz im Gebirge von Caspar David Friedrich einschliesst. Weisst du ganz sicher, ob dieses Werk sich in der Galerie Neue Meister oder in der Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister (auch in Dresden) befindet? Ich interessiere mich dafür, weil ich den Wikipedia-Artikel Galerie Neue Meister gerade gestartet habe, aber es ist mir noch unklar, welche Dresdner Galerie Das Kreuz besitzt. Danke schön. 86.155.177.191 16:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC) Lfh.Reply

Ach, du kannst meine Frage ignorieren, ich habe nun die Antwort gefunden (Galerie Neue Meister). 86.159.44.141 10:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Trotzdem Danke für Dein Interesse. Noch ein Tipp: [1], es ist übrigens der Tetschener Altar, nichts für ungut. Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 19:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Danke, ich werde das merken. Ciao 86.159.44.141 18:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Helene_Schjerfbeck_Verwundeter_Krieger.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Helene_Schjerfbeck_Verwundeter_Krieger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1894_039_524.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Deutsches_Reichsgesetzblatt_1894_039_524.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Good twins (talk) 09:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Glaspalast-Katastrophe

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo A. Wagner, du hattest die Kategorie angelegt und auch die darin enthaltenen Abbildungen aus dem Buch gescannt. Sind das alle, die in dem Buch enthalten sind?

Auf de-wiki wurde nun die Liste der zerstörten Werke aus de:Glaspalast (München) ausgelagert in eine eigene de:Liste beim Brand des Münchner Glaspalasts zerstörter Werke. Da kann man das ganze auch etwas größer gestalten, so dass die Bilder auch besser zu erkennen sind.

Könntest du die Liste aus dem Buch noch etwas ergänzen? Da ist z.B. bei den nicht abgebildeten Gemälden oft (Öl) in der zweiten Spalte eingetragen, m.E. sollte das für jedes Bild in einer eigenen Spalte oder einfach hinter den Titel. Interessant wäre m.E. auch noch die Jahreszahl der Entstehung. Grüße --Bjs (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Die Bilder wurden insoweit sämtlich hochgeladen, bis auf die Bilder, die schon auf commons waren:

Runge mit Braut und Bruder

die Erythräische Sybille von Overbeck

das Dominikanerkloster von CDF.

Das Buch kann ich leider nicht komplett hochladen, da der Herausgeber Georg Jacob Wolf noch nicht gemeinfrei ist. Auch sind Fotos von der Ausstellung im Buch, die sicher auch noch nicht gemeinfrei sind. Das (Öl) kann ich gerne noch nachtragen, die Jahreszahl ist im Buch nicht angegeben. Da die Bilder jetzt größer sind, sollte ich die vielleicht nochmal in größerer Auflösung einscannen. Grüße--A. Wagner (talk) 15:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Scannen mit größerer Aufklösung ist sicher nicht erforderlich, für die Voransichten mit 120px reicht die jetzige Auflösung dicke.

Beim Buch dachte ich nicht an das komplette Hochladen, sondern an evtl. noch nicht hochgeladene Bilder, dies dann wohl nicht mehr gibt, oder an informationen, die noch in die Liste eingebaut werden könnten.

Was hältst du von meinem Vorschlag auf der Diskussionsseite der Liste, die Liste zu einem Artikel über die Ausstellung selbst zu erweitern? Gibt da das Buch genügend Material her, aus dem man mit eigenen Worten etwas schreiben kann (z.B. von wem initiiert / organisiert, Auswahlkriterien der Bilder, woher kamen die Bilder usw.)? Grüße --Bjs (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Coole Idee, im Buch steht einiges, ich werde mich da mal reinknien für einen Anfang. Grüße :) --A. Wagner (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Super, das macht doch gleich viel mehr her als so eine nackte Liste. Grüße --Bjs (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Erledigt, siehe w:de:Werke deutscher Romantiker von Caspar David Friedrich bis Moritz von Schwind. Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Files

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I ask you to rename the following files:

File:Kosovo AL Flag Map.svg in Flag-map of the Republic of Kosova (1990-2000).svg

File:Flag-map of Czechoslovakia.svg in Flag-map of Czechoslovakia (1945-1993).svg (Until 1945, there were other border.)

File:BelarusStub.svg in Flag-map of Belarus.svg

File:Belgium stub.svg in Flag-map of Belgium.svg

File:Cyprus stub.svg in Flag-map of Cyprus.svg

File:Czech Republic stub.svg in Flag-map of the Czech Republic.svg

File:DenmarkStub2.svg in Flag-map of Denmark.svg

File:DenmarkStub2.png in Flag-map of Denmark.png

File:Greenland stub.svg in Flag-map of Greenland.svg

File:Estonia stub.svg in Flag-map of Estonia.svg

File:Faroe Islands stub.svg in Flag-map of the Faroe Islands.svg

File:Finland stub POL.svg in Flag-map of Finland.svg

File:France Flag Map.svg in Flag-map of France.svg

File:South Ossetia map flag.svg in Flag-map of South Ossetia.svg

File:Hungary stub.svg in Flag-map of Hungary.svg

File:IcelandStub.svg in Flag-map of Iceland.svg

File:Isle of Man stub.svg in Flag-map of the Isle of Man.svg

File:Jersey stub.svg in Flag-map of Jersey.svg

File:Luxembourg geo stub.svg in Flag-map of Luxembourg.svg

File:Netherlands stub.svg in Flag-map of the Netherlands.svg

File:Norway flagmap.svg in Flag-map of Norway.svg

File:Poland map flag.svg in Flag-map of Poland.svg

File:Slovakiatynkä.svg in Flag-map of Slovakia.svg

File:Sverige FlaggKarta.svg in Flag-map of Sweden.svg

File:Outline of Ukraine.svg in Flag-map of the Ukraine.svg

File:UK Outline and Flag.svg in Flag-map of the United Kingdom.svg

File:Map-Flag of the Soviet Union.svg in Flag-map of the Soviet Union.svg (For all others: more correct name.)

D5A (talk) 16:38, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, thats not files from me. Please ask the uploader. --A. Wagner (talk) 17:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1877 S. 258 und 323

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Die beiden angegebenen Seiten fehlen leider. Könnten Sie diese auch noch hochladen? Vielen Dank! --93.82.69.5 15:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Danke für den Hinweis, die fehlenden Buchseiten wurden soeben hochgeladen. Viele Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 19:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Briefmarkenalben

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

DDR 1954 ist jetzt komplett, DDR 1955 wurde ergänzt. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Besten Dank, das werden ja die reinsten Augenweiden ;-)... Ich kann die Alben auch aus meinem Benutzernamensraum rausnehmen, wenn ich nur wüsste, wohin.... Dann könnten alle interessierten Online-Philatelisten mit daran arbeiten.... Gruss --A. Wagner (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Verschieben nach Stamps of the German Democratic Republic, in der Kategorienangabe mit "| " als Haupartikel kennzeichnen. Grüße --Bjs (talk) 09:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

LUTHER AT WORMS

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello I have a Large Hugo Burkner signed. I guess I really do not know what to do with it or how to even take care of itFile:The Monument ERECTED TO LUTHER AT WORMS THE 25 JUNE 1868 AFTER THE SKETCH OF RIETSCHEL 04.JPG

Thanks, it's ordered by Category Category:Hugo Bürkner --A. Wagner (talk) 20:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

removing hidden category

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This is a hidden category and serves to relate the image to its source. If it's not incorrect, there's no need to remove it. Do you have a specific rationale for these removals? If the museum is correct, please reinstate them. Thanks, Boo-Boo Baroo (talk) 17:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

This category is dispensable in the category: Category:Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister (Dresden). Can this category covert, that these be really invisible? It is deceptive. --A. Wagner (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is a way for us to attach the "Google Art Project images by museum" to the relevant museum. Once a hidden category is attached to a non-hidden one, you see it in the non-hidden one. No great harm is done by leaving the Google Art category under Category:Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister (Dresden), and we have done this with all museums. See for example Category:Musée d'Orsay. It is certainly relevant to the museum it is attached to. Will you please revert the removed categories? Boo-Boo Baroo (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think, should be this category temporarily like this Category:Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, as example File:Fotothek df ps 0004511 Kirchen ^ Dome.jpg? IMO this rule affected the category-tree of commons. --A. Wagner (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand your argument, which is fair because I don't speak German :-) -- but I do not understand why a little bit of text at the bottom of the file page is causing you to have such a strong opinion. (Even if the Google category was removed from Category:Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister (Dresden), all the individual artworks would still have that small, hidden Google-Gemäldegalerie category at the bottom.) Boo-Boo Baroo (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

The problem is done, i have remove Category:Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister (Dresden) from the hidden cat Category:Google Art Project works in Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister – Old Masters Picture Gallery - thanks. --A. Wagner (talk) 20:38, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fotos aus Löbtau

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo! Ich wollte dichmal daran erinnern, dass du doch noch Bilder aus Löbtau bei dir rumliegen hast. Bisher hab ich die noch nicht bei Commons gefunden ;) Wäre schön, wenn ich mir das Ergebnis des Spaziergangs auch mal anschauen kann :) --Don-kun (talk) 18:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

das ist mir zwar peinlich, aber die Bilder sind leider nicht gut genug zum Hochladen. Die sind einfach Schrott, für eine Veröffentlichung in keinster Weise geeignet. Tut mir leid. --A. Wagner (talk) 16:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wie schade :( --Don-kun (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1903 035 I.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1903 035 I.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 14:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

erledigt: --A. Wagner (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1903 035 II.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1903 035 II.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 14:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

erledigt: --A. Wagner (talk) 21:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1905 043 I.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1905 043 I.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

thanks + done. Yours faithfully --A. Wagner (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Script

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey there A. Wagner! I just developed a small simple script for filemovers and thought that you might use it. Paste importScript('User:Ethically Yours/fileMove.js'); in your skin page (say, vector.js) and reload your browser. You get a small link displaying "File Rename" in your toolbox to Media requiring renaming page. If the feedback is nice I'll add to it to display the number of files in backlog in a small box, but this is just a beta sort of, and anyways there's nothing much special, just that it's quite helpful. Thought you may be interested. Thanks! Ethically Yours (talk) 12:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Löschdiskussion Korrespondenz Bachstitz auf Commons

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo A. Wagner, Danke für Ihre Schützenhilfe in der Diskussion bei Source. Wenn Sie Ganz viel Lust haben, könnten Sie dann den Menschen, der dieselbe Korrespondenz auf Commons löschen will, bezirzen? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Blatt_357_-_99_Rechnung.jpg Sonst ist alles doch umsonst gewesen. Ihr Henning1973

My English ist für die feine juristische Klinge a little big bad. Kann man einen Link zur Original-Quelle im Internet legen? Dann brauchen wir commons nicht. Ggf. können wir die Quellen auch bei Wikisource hochladen. Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 16:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Fliesen Schloss Caputh

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Andreas,

ich sehe gerade, dass du die Motivfliesen sehr feingliedrig kategorisiert hast. Willst du das nicht lieber in der Galerie tun und den Überblick über die Hauptmotive (Springedeers, Alltagsszenen, Schiffe, Landschaften + Mühlen, noch eins?) in den Kategorien ermöglichen? --Anika (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Anika, da würde ich Dir den Vortritt lassen. Der Aufbau der Galerie gefällt mir gut, bin gespannt, wie Du das weiter entwickeln wirst. Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wandfliese aus dem Schloss Caputh, Motiv: Tier im Kreis

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fliesensaal,_Schloss_Caputh?uselang=de#/media/File:Schloss_Caputh_Fliese_Tier_0002.jpg Was für ein Tier soll/könnte das sein? Ich sehe eher eine Person, die eine Rumpfbeuge bzw. eine bodentiefe Verbeugung macht -> kopfüberhängender Zopf? Viele Grüße, Katharina — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.8.223.8 (talk) 20:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Vielleicht ein Fabeltier, damit es den Fliesenmalern nicht langweilig wurde? --A. Wagner (talk) 21:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hochgeschätzer A. Wagner. Es ist die Darstellung eines Walfisches (Wasserfontäne aus dem Atemloch) von einem Maler, der den Fisch allerdings nur aus Beschreibungen kannte. Gruß und Dank für Deine wunderbaren Hochladungen von Bernd Schwabe bei Wikipedia und hier: --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lieber Bernd Schwabe, gemeint ist eher das seltsame Viech im Kreis, aber trotzdem vielen Dank. Wir tun doch alle nur unseren Job.

Beste Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 22:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1911 062 II.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1911 062 II.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your collaboration. It is already done. Greetings --A. Wagner (talk) 10:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reichsgesetzblatt

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo A., lege bitte keine neuen Kategorien an, wenn schon alte existieren. Statt dessen verschiebe die alten Kategorien zu ihren neuen Namen. Dadurch bleibt a) die Versionshistorie erhalten, wird b) ein Redirect angelegt und zeigen c) Links aus anderen Projekten nicht ins Leere, wenn die alte Kat gelöscht wird. Danke & Gruß, --Achim (talk) 14:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Achim, danke für den Tipp, werde ich beim nächsten Mal beachten. Viele Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 15:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bildergalerie Klaerwerk Kaditz 43.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo. Das o.g. Bild gefällt mir sehr gut. Allerdings sehe ich keine Freigabe des Urhebers. Kommt die noch oder übersehe ich etwas? --Derbrauni (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Derbrauni, die Genehmigung ist hier: https://www.stadtentwaesserung-dresden.de/infokanal/mediathek/fotos.html. War bei dem vorigen Foto im Artikel auch schon so: File:SE DD Bildergalerie Klaerwerk Kaditz 19.jpg. Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 17:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hallo A. Wagner. Danke für deine schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich bezweifle aber, dass "Sie können gern alle hier veröffentlichten Bilder für Ihre Publikationen verwenden. Vermerken Sie in diesen Fällen Quelle: Stadtentwässerung Dresden GmbH." reicht, um die Fotos hier unter CC-Lizenz reinzustellen. Ich werde das mal im Forum ansprechen. Ich möchte das Bild auch gern behalten, aber nicht die Stadtreinigung verprellen. --Derbrauni (talk) 09:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Derbrauni, das musst Du nicht. Ich hatte damals die persönliche Erlaubnis von der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit eingeholt, sonst gäbe es diese Kategorien hier nicht: Category:Kläranlage Kaditz, Category:Stadtentwässerung Dresden. Ich kann Dir gerne den Ansprechpartner nennen, das geht alles in Ordnung. Das war damals im Zusammenhang mit diesem Artikel: w:de:Kläranlage Dresden-Kaditz geklärt worden. Dabei wurde auch dieses Bild File:SE DD Faulturmpanorama.jpg aufgenommen, und zwar mit ausdrücklicher Genehmigung von SEDD. Gruß --A. Wagner (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 24T2 018 0109.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Kulturabkommen von ifa.de

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Guten Abend. Lädtst Du die Kulturabkommen und andere Mitteilungen aus dem BGBl. auch noch als PDF hoch, oder kopierst Du die nur seitenweise als Grafiken? Das hier bietet sich doch als Upload an, und in Category:Kulturabkommen (Deutschland) sehe ich bisher nur JPGs und "Hörbücher". De728631 (talk) 17:53, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hallo De728631, die scans dienen als Grundlage und Korrekturvorlage für Transkriptionen, die wir auf Wikisource anlegen. Das ist ein gemeinsames Projekt mit dem IfA. --A. Wagner (talk) 19:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Aha, dann kann ich das nachvollziehen. Viel Erfolg damit.

De728631 (talk) 19:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Danke. --A. Wagner (talk) 19:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nominating redirects for deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, A. Wagner. When you nominate redirects for deletion, then please add "speedydelete" before "#REDIRECT". If added after "#REDIRECT", then speedy deletions category shows like you want to delete whole image. Experience is needed to understand, that actually only redirect must be deleted. Thank you for your work! Taivo (talk) 21:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Commons: Caroline von Humboldt (Mutter) vs. Caroline von Humboldt (Tochter)

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo A. Wagner! Aus zuverlässiger Quelle habe ich gehört, dass das hier Category:Caroline von Humboldt von dir(?) eingestellte Bildnis Caroline von Humboldts nicht die damit verbundene Person zeigt.

Humboldt, Caroline von (1766-1829, http://d-nb.info/gnd/118554719) ist die damit verbundene Person, aber:
Humboldt, Caroline von (1792-1837, http://d-nb.info/gnd/116036141) ist ihre Tochter, und diese ist hier abgebildet.

Da ich weiß, wie man das auf der Ebene ändert, könntest du bitte aushelfen? Dank und Gruß, Christian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lit cht (talk • contribs) 09:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Christian, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich habs auch gleich geändert. Meine Quelle: Karl Simon: Gottlieb Schick. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der deutschen Malerei um 1800. Leipzig 1914 http://digital.slub-dresden.de/id481466991

Mutter
Tochter

Viele Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 17:29, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank, dass du das so schnell und unkompliziert gemacht hast! Viele Grüße, Christian Lit cht (talk) 08:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi A. Wagner,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi A. Wagner,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi A. Wagner,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

done--A. Wagner (talk) 20:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Important message for file movers

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Stadtpläne von Dresden

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Andreas, du hast ja echt schöne Bilder der Großindustrie hochgeladen. Beim Versuch das Bild File:Großindustrie_Sachsen_T1_0235.jpg zu georeferenzioeren, hab ich mal gleich noch alle verfügbaren brauchbaren Stadtpläne von Dresden hier gesammelt. Nach 1912 haben wir scheinbar nix. Kannst du mal in der SLUB schauen ob du da noch was findest? Also ein paar Pläne von der Zeit zwischen 1912 und 1945 wären super, auch danach, falls verfügbar. Auch wäre schön, wenn wir von 1830 den Plan für diesen Kartenausschnitt hätten, weil da Hausnummern drauf sind. Ich mach mal auch noch einen @Jeb: . Ich kenne das Kartenforum, aber ich weiß nicht wie ich von dort die Karten nach Commons bekomme, weil ich sie nur zerkachelt sehe. -- sk (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Stefan, schön, das Dir die Bilder gefallen, das gibts noch mehr davon, die muss ich noch hochladen. Zu den Stadtplänen komme ich demgemäß erst später, Du kannst mir aber inzwischen einen Link senden, wenn Du einen gefunden hast, ich kümmere mich dann darum. Übrigens die Adresse der Eschenbachschen Fabrik ist Hospitalplatz Nr. 2, 3 und 4, hier ist er zu finden: File:Dresden Map 1895.jpg. Gruß --A. Wagner (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

File:Ministerial-Amtsblatt Bayern 1893 028 359.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

done --A. Wagner (talk) 10:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Ministerial-Amtsblatt Bayern 1893 027 355.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

done --A. Wagner (talk) 10:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Ministerial-Amtsblatt Bayern 1893 027 354.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

done --A. Wagner (talk) 10:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Einsortierung in Category:Schloss_Döben

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo A. Wagner, die Neusortierung der Postkarten und Zeichnungen der Kategorie Schloss Döben war nicht umsonst so vorgenommen, generell gilt das Bilder nicht überkategorisiert werden sollen. Die Postkarten sind bereits in der Kategorie: Category:Postcards of Döben (Grimma) published by Brück & Sohn‎ enthalten und die Zeichnungen in der Kategorie: Category:Drawings of Döben (Grimma)‎‎ eine Einsortierung zusätzlich in der Kategorie: Category:Schloss_Döben daher als nicht notwendig angesehen (siehe dazu [2] ) und eine Ausnahme (gemäß [3]) braucht hier für die Kategorie: Category:Schloss_Döben nicht gemacht zu werden, da die Bilder unter Zeichnungen und Postkarten eindeutig mit der jeweiligen Unterkategorien zugeordnet sind und darüber gefunden werden können. Einzige Möglichkeit wäre eine neue Unterkategorie zu bilden, welche dann Postkarten und Zeichnungen von Schloss Döben heisst, was aber als übertrieben angesehen wird, da es ja bereits beide Unterkategorien gibt. Wenn du eine andere Meinung dazu hast, bitte in Diskussion [4] einfügen.--Cookroach (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Cookroach, wurde rückgängig gemacht, erledigt. --A. Wagner (talk) 16:46, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Wilhelm Hoffmann Dresdener Galerie Cabinet No. 044a.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wilhelm Hoffmann Dresdener Galerie Cabinet No. 044a.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: File:Wilhelm Hoffmann Dresdener Galerie Cabinet No. 044.jpg)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Jonund.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Wilhelm Hoffmann Dresdener Galerie Cabinet No. 044.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wilhelm Hoffmann Dresdener Galerie Cabinet No. 044.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jonund (talk) 12:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1916 258 1271.png

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1916 258 1271.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This image contains a wordmark of Google LLC. Using this image under publich domain may be a trademark violation. Please update a copy of the original without Google logo.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.146.248.54 10:53, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

5.146.248.54 11:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1919 152 1383.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt 1919 152 1383.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 212.37.51.250.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 11:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Danke für Deine Arbeiten

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Guten Tag, @A. Wagner: . Vielen Dank für Deine hochaufgelösten Scans. Zu dem File:Catalogue of miniatures 1914 No. 74.jpg habe ich zwei Fragen:

Woher hast Du Informationen hinsichtlich der Kategorie "Leinstraße"?
Warum Mehmet von Königstreu als Kategorie für das Foto?

Herzlichen Dank für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. Ich freue mich auf Deine Antwort(en). Gibst Du mir bitte einen kurzen Ping (wie ich das oben gemacht habe; also @Bernd Schwabe in Hannover: ? Dann bekomme ich Deine Antwort direkt zielgenau angezeigt. Dank und Gruß von Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nochmal @A. Wagner: . Hab's gefunden (zur ersten Frage): Es ist das Haus der Hahnschen Buchhandlung, wie Du im Vergleich mit diesem File:1920er Jahre circa Wilhelm Ackermann, Hannover, Schlossstraße.jpg Foto (Haus ganz links im Bild) vergleichen kannst. Danke nochmal. Bleibt also nur die zweite Frage offen. Gruß von

Hallo @Bernd Schwabe in Hannover: , gemäß Bildbeschreibung aus der Quelle steht das Bild in Zusammenhang mit Bild Nr. 72 und 73

Nr. 72
Nr. 73

und wurde deshalb in die betreffende Category einsortiert. Viele Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 07:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Danke für Deine Arbeiten

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Ich möchte mich dem Dank anschließen. Zu dem ungewöhnlichen Zeitungsprojekt eine Frage bzw. eine Bitte: Bei File:Dresdner Journal 1906 004 Gewerbehaus.jpg und ähnlichen Dateien würde ich es begrüßen, wenn man eine Quelle oder ein Datum (ich rate mal, 004 steht entweder für die Ausgabe 4 oder für den 4. Januar) dazu angeben würde. Wenn wenigstens die Gesamtseite, aus der die Anzeige ausgeschnitten ist, auch in Wikisource vorhanden wäre, könnte man sich womöglich den Zusammenhang erschließen, aber die Gesamtseite finde ich nicht. Pp.paul.4 (talk) 08:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Pp.paul.4, 004 steht für die Nummer des Jahrganges. Das komplette Blatt findest Du hier: http://digital.slub-dresden.de/id480674442-19060105/4 Grüße von --A. Wagner (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Jupiter_in_art

Latest comment: 24 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jupiter in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 04:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic